there's lots of First Person Shooters: Outlaws, Redneck Rampage, Shadow Warrior, Blood, Hexen 2, Dark Forces 2, and Quake 2, none of which are groundbreaking.
there's lots of First Person Shooters: Outlaws, Redneck Rampage, Shadow Warrior, Blood, Hexen 2, Dark Forces 2, and Quake 2, none of which are groundbreaking.
(Myth looks interesting, though).
Funny you say that, since 1997 is imo the year to go to if one is looking for real time strategy/tactical/some weird hybrid games that aren't shit and uninspired. Myth, Close Combat, Beasts & Bumpkins, Dungeon Keeper, Total Annihilation, Dark Reign. Age of Empires is also a 1997 I believe, though obviously less innovative than those.1. 1997 was the year of Real Time Strategy and little originality. Half the games that year seems to have been games inspired by Warcraft 2 and Command&Conquer (Myth looks interesting, though).
So when 97 is coming back again ?
there's lots of First Person Shooters: Outlaws, Redneck Rampage, Shadow Warrior, Blood, Hexen 2, Dark Forces 2, and Quake 2, none of which are groundbreaking.
So when 97 is coming back again ?
2097?
Funny you say that, since 1997 is imo the year to go to if one is looking for real time strategy/tactical/some weird hybrid games that aren't shit and uninspired. Myth, Close Combat, Beasts & Bumpkins, Dungeon Keeper, Total Annihilation, Dark Reign. Age of Empires is also a 1997 I believe, though obviously less innovative than those.1. 1997 was the year of Real Time Strategy and little originality. Half the games that year seems to have been games inspired by Warcraft 2 and Command&Conquer (Myth looks interesting, though).
To be honest, in those times even the really basic RTS games like Dark Colony or KKND (both 1997) often actually had quite a lot of charm.
And 1997 has a metric ton of great games that were not RTS-thereabouts.
No denying it was a bad year for crpgs, still - Fallout makes up a lot, doesn't it?
there's lots of First Person Shooters: Outlaws, Redneck Rampage, Shadow Warrior, Blood, Hexen 2, Dark Forces 2, and Quake 2, none of which are groundbreaking.
Its like i always said. Innovation means shit, and people obsessing over it are retards.
Only thing that matters is good.
But I didn't comment on wether they are good or not
This thread's premise is a lie as Quake was released in 1996.
there's lots of First Person Shooters: Outlaws, Redneck Rampage, Shadow Warrior, Blood, Hexen 2, Dark Forces 2, and Quake 2, none of which are groundbreaking.
Its like i always said. Innovation means shit, and people obsessing over it are retards.
Only thing that matters is good.
But I didn't comment on wether they are good or not
Precisely. That's the fucking problem bro.
Goddamn, you've got some demanding reviewers there Anyway, I definitely recommend playing DK and all the other games I mentioned. Dark Reign and Age of Empires are probably the most skippable from that list. If you don't like RTS formula then the odds are you won't like Total Annihilation as well, though it's definitely a gem among classic RTS games.I remember my gaming buddy and I were looking forward to DK, but I never played it due to bad reviews and the game not turning out as was originally advertised.
Imperialism, Pacific General, Panzer General II, Incubation - just from the top of my had. Wasn't so bad.I recall being fed up with all the C&C clones that came out that year, and hardly a turn based Strategy game