Are there any codex approved games that are actually good? I'm having troubles finding one.
Very often it's not entirely about 'good'. This is what befuddles a lot of retards straight out the traps. Yes, I did just kinda intentionally offend you there. Sorry about that. There's a basic standard of expectation which a lot of games achieve, and I mean a lot, but there's also an even vaster number of games which don't even make the cut for basic expectations, such as flash games, mobile games, some MMOs, lots of console games blah blah blah, but also games which are just unplayable due to bugs and poor optimisation.
The codex approved list is just a summary of which PC games the visitors to this site have found the most affection for. While the lists are mostly common sense, the codex lists will, unusually, include games that were bugged out messes or poorly optimised at release because people have played heavily modded versions, so, when they vote for something it's actually a modded version, not the regular release, something which would confuse someone who is unaware of this.
Another common element to this site is it's pride in exclaiming the freedom to be negative. This resulted in a huge influx of posters from the shitstorm on the No Mutants Allowed forum (the Fallout forums) when Bethesda started making Fallout games:
Fallout
Fallout 2
Fallout: New Vegas
Planescape: Torment
Deus Ex
Morrowind
I have a big list of rpgs to play, but those I've played (especially Morrowind and New Vegas) and enjoyed.
I'm not saying this particular poster is such a person, but you can't move more than an inch round here for someone praising Fallout 1, 2 and New Vegas; the strange and only slightly understandable desire to praise anything Bethesda pre-Oblivion but to hate everything Bethesda post-Oblivion; the idea that PS:T is in some way the best IE game, even though it's the buggiest, weakest in gameplay and was the least popular upon original release; that Deus Ex is somehow not just an intelligent persons shooter but a genius RPG.
If the guy had mentioned System Shock 2 then you'd have a 2016 carbon copy generic Codex Poster (tm).
I don't deny Fallout 1, 2 and New Vegas are good games. I just find them all shit for different reasons combined with the fact that I have no interest in the Post-Apoc setting generally. Not because they are shit games, they're not, they're just shit for me, because I can't last much more than the first few hours before I quit in despair. Similarly I find both Morrowind and Deus Ex shit. Not because they're shit games, but because I have no interest in First Person Shooters or First Person Fantasy nor a whole host of other gameplay features that repel me like the smell of old socks. PS:T I thoroughly enjoyed, but I still have no desire to ever replay it many years down the line, now that's not a statement which proves its shit, but it's a statement that says I prefer playing other types of games and that replay value is important for me.
To me, this guy doesn't even represent the concept of RPGs, it's like the guy's allergic to fantasy. Yes, I know, what is fantasy? Blah blah blah, but you know exactly what I'm talking about. Just because generic fantasy is overexposed and devs shy away from inserting any sense of original fantasy to the generic norms doesn't mean I throw the baby out with the bathwater, I just find the fantasy games I like among the red herrings instead of over subjecting myself to every shitpiece which claims to have Elves/Dwarfs and fireballs.
However, this guy and his tastes just happen to be the dominant voice on the codex at this point in time. So what ya gonna do...? Me? Nothing, just sit and wait for tastes to change again.
What can I advise for you as 'codex approved' cRPGs that are 'actually good'?
Well how about you actually communicate what kind of shit you like eating first you imbecilic egofed attention whoring dickhead?