Andhaira said:As do I.
DarkUnderlord said:Some interesting stats:
Threads started by this person in Retardo Land
- Anonymous: 138 threads
- Volourn: 116 threads
- Andhaira: 87 threads
Alright, if that's supposed to be off limits, then we might as well shut down the codex right now. When the old timers get nagged about why they don't post as much anymore one of the two main reasons is that they've already discussed all the threads in General RPG/design before. What a lot of you morons (not necessarily you Murrow, you're cool) don't seem to understand is that when you're discussing the same topic with two different people, you have two bloody different topics. Also, considering that 90% of all topics on the codex go off topic within two posts, searching the codex for any given topic doesn't necessarily tell you whether or not the topic has been discussed. If you find a topic with the same theme, you can be damned that by the second page it's about something of the extreme opposite or completely unrelated. And it's kinda unreasonable to expect everyone to scourge every other thread to see if some random THE CODEX IS DED-thread has evolved into some epic discussion about phase based combat (usually the other way around, I know). I might add my theory that the fact that every topic (not just Andhairas) has been done to death is part of the reason to the (in the codex-regular Brother Nones words) codex' increasing pathological tendency to discuss its own state. The zomg it's done before-crowd should head over to the Iron Tower Forums, where about every thread not about AoD is definitely had on the codex at one time or another. But hey, whaddyaknow, there's some actual discussion going on, even despite that there's almost exclusively codex regulars (including Brother None) that post there. What's even more surprising is that the lulz I get from the ITS-forums last a hell of a lot longer than what I get from the codex these days. Funny things tend to get more funny when it sticks out.Edward_R_Murrow said:Old and discussed to deathDementia Praecox said:Over half his threads are fine.
Waah waah, so more than half his threads are shit. Sue me. Don't you know that over half (69%) of all statistics are bullshit anyway. Every thread, save one (it's even a sticky!), of KC are shit. He's a mod now. Two years from now, Andhaira is running the codex. Mark my words.These aren't counting any of his Retardo'd threads either, which account for what seems to be roughly half of all his threads. So the only "good" threads are his 4E news threads and the scant few that aren't half bad discussion topics, and I stress the idea of a scant few.
Well my post should have shut the "OMG-ANDHAIRA-THREAD:-SPAM-SPAM-SPAM"-crowd up. Did it happen?Anyway, that should shut the people who say over half his threads are good up.
Some of the best lulz I get from the codex these days is reading the mod/admin replies in the Ban-X-polls and ZOMG-codex-decline threads. I'm beginning to suspect that anyone with a join date prior to 2006 just does it for the lulz. I mean, the only thing that's been fairly constant since it's birth, is the Codex Moderation Policy (TM). Still some people are to thick to get it (still cool, murrow). The only ones more stubborn than Volourn and Andhaira here, is the Codex crew, and I love them for that. [/cocksucking]And once that happens, I honestly have to ask, why is there no admin intervention?
These days, who hasn't? No seriously?He has a negative net productivity, and is seriously impacting the Codex in a bad way, even if only serving as an enabler for other people.
Because you (the codex) are doing it wrong.Why no admin intervention?
I'm just starting to like him more and more for every post I make in his defense. I mean:Can anyone seriously apply some value to him?
I laughed hard.Andhaira said:I would be happy to give you some pointers shaggy. Also, dancing andhaira pic is your firend.
Seconded.Anyhow, just out of curiousity whose alt is larpingdude?
You know, even for a regular, you have some serious issues with the management here. Perhaps you should try to stars your own forums and show them how it's done.Brother None said:Well perhaps the way he stated it, but personally, I've always disliked moderating purely by the rules without letting community factors enter into it.
The only problem with that is that there are so many posters who should face the ban hammer first, and all the bandwidth the BAN-X-PLZ and UNBAN ANDHAIRA threads would steal afterward is bound to pull the sorcerers servers down. The only wrath the codex can't handle is Taluntains.The simple question for Andharia would be: is the Codex better off with him or without him?
Please don't. Adding the ignore-function was more than DAC enough. The custom tags are getting enough DAC-ish by the minute, now every douche on these boards want one.It'd be easy enough to add a bit of code in posting.php to prevent Andhaira posting new topics anyway. Though that leads us down the path of DAC
Dementia Praecox said:You know, even for a regular
Dementia Praecox said:you have some serious issues with the management here.
Dementia Praecox said:Perhaps you should try to stars your own forums and show them how it's done.
Dementia Praecox said:But seriously, look at all the drama the banning of TNP made. I mean, there hasn't been a more clear case of needs-to-be-banned ever. I think the drama following an Andhaira-ban would put the codex more to shame than Andhaira and Co ever would.
Just you wait. Despite registering in 2004, you haven't really been a (posting) regular for little more than a year if you exclude that epic NMA vs Codex-drama. You're showing all the symptoms and you know it. I give you one year before you're an all converted Angry Cunt. In two years you have a dumbfuck tag on NMA and Retardo Land on GameBanshee.Codex Regular said:No I don't. I was just makin' a suggestion. Any my earlier remark was more frustration at Andy's stupidity than at the moderating that allows him to yet breathe. [...] So heck, I wouldn't be even remotely capable of the amount of self-loathing the Codex community lays upon itself in these kind of threads. Mine is more of a mild aversion, by comparison.Dementia Praecox said:you have some serious issues with the management here.
Haha, I just got an awesome idea: What if Andhaira joins the ITS-forums and start spamming his "good"-topics, i.e. those who are done to death without all the lulz (which pretty much came as an answer to the codexers spam-assaulting him, ref. DUs earlier posts in this thread), and see how he fares there. Now if the codex regulars over at the ITS manage to control them selves, my theory is that we'll get quite some interesting discussions.The No Andharia Allowed forum?
That's right. After the whole VD-gate, banning Andhaira would be pretty much throwing all fought-for principles out of the window.Wow, Catch-22.
“Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain” --the Wizard of Oz.Andhaira said:Anyhow, just out of curiousity whose alt is larpingdude?
GeneralSamov said:This thread is quality lulz.
That's a pretty good idea, actually. Here's something I whipped up with my rudimentary HTML DOM / JavaScript knowledge:pkt-zer0 said:If having a mental spamfilter up is too much hassle, people could just use a Greasemonkey script or something to filter out Andharia's threads/posts.
// ==UserScript==
// @name AndhairaFilter
// @namespace http://www.rpgcodex.net/phpBB/
// @description Filters Andhaira's posts on RPGCodex forums
// @include http://www.rpgcodex.net/phpBB/*
// ==/UserScript==
// List of users whose posts are filtered.
var postfilter = new Array( 'Andhaira' );
var spans = document.getElementsByTagName( 'span' );
var foundpost = false;
for( var i = 0; i < spans.length; ++i )
{
if( !foundpost && spans[i].getAttribute('class') == 'name' )
{
for( var j = 0; j < postfilter.length; ++j )
{
if( spans[i].parentNode.innerHTML.search( postfilter[j] ) != -1 )
{
foundpost = true;
break;
}
}
continue;
}
if( foundpost && spans[i].getAttribute('class') == 'postbody' )
{
spans[i].parentNode.parentNode.removeChild(spans[i].parentNode);
foundpost = false;
continue;
}
}
Actually, we already have a far more varied and imaginative selection of custom tags and avatars on NMA, courtesy of Rosh.[/code]Dementia Praecox said:In two years you have a dumbfuck tag on NMA and Retardo Land on GameBanshee.
Ratty said:I for one enjoy browsing an Andhaira-free Codex.
DarkUnderlord said:There are a lot of people who I feel don't necessarily "add to the Codex". I don't think enforcing a draconian Nazi-style "purge the unworthy" regime would help it though. It's an internet forum. People come and go. Some will stick around and end up posting some worthwhile things, while others will eventually leave. At the moment though, Andhaira is the in-thing to bitch about.Brother None said:Well perhaps the way he stated it, but personally, I've always disliked moderating purely by the rules without letting community factors enter into it. The simple question for Andharia would be: is the Codex better off with him or without him?
Also, I have truly epic amounts of patience coupled with an awesome ability to simply wear others down given time.
Special_Can said:Oh, and it's AND-HAIR-A. I'm starting to think it's a joke to misspell his username...did I miss something?
Special_Can said:I don't see the problem with Andhaira's constant spamming. It's not very irritating and when people take it seriously, it sometimes leads to an interesting discussion. It's the codex making it worse then it is. When they decide a topic sucks before even giving it a chance and start spamming it with random pictures and attacks on Andhaira and how stupid he is, that's when it gets to be a bad thing. Thanks for proving how smart you are, come again when Andhaira starts his new topic in 10 minutes.
Oh, and it's AND-HAIR-A. I'm starting to think it's a joke to misspell his username...did I miss something?
Wyrmlord said:and Shaitan, meaning evil.