Ranselknulf
Arcane
I'll take your word on it, I'm not exactly an expert on Carmack.
Pretty sure that with these types of contracts they only own what he creates on company time and/or company computers. There's no way they can own what he creates at home, on his personal computer, in his spare time.If he really did work for both at the same time and signed a typical corporate contract with Zenimax where they own everything he created while an employee... well... could get interesting.
Pretty sure that with these types of contracts they only own what he creates on company time and/or company computers. There's no way they can own what he creates at home, on his personal computer, in his spare time.If he really did work for both at the same time and signed a typical corporate contract with Zenimax where they own everything he created while an employee... well... could get interesting.
ZeniMax has filed a legal notice against id Software founder John Carmack, accusing him of taking “ZeniMax’s intellectual property with him to Oculus,” according to The Wall Street Journal.
The firm claims Carmack took software he was developing while at id Software with him when he left the firm he co-founded for Oculus VR.
Carkmack took to Twitter to state that while ZeniMax may “own the code” he wrote, “no work ever done has been patented.
“No work I have ever done has been patented,” he said. “Zenimax owns the code that I wrote, but they don’t own VR.”
While Oculus is denying the claim, ZeniMax sent a formal legal notice to the firm asking it to draw up a licensing agreement with it, or ZeniMax will take the company to court.
The claim also states that Oculus VR boss Palmer Luckey was aware of property owned by Zenimax was in-house and acknowledged said property in writing.
A spokesman for Oculus told the Wall Street Journal that the situation was “unfortunate, but when there’s this type of transaction, people come out of the woodwork with ridiculous and absurd claims.”
“We intend to vigorously defend Oculus and its investors to the fullest extent,” Oculus continued.
It is unknown at present whether Facebook was aware that ZeniMax was in the process of seeking compensation for its intellectual property developed with the Oculus Rift by Carmack when it made the $2 billion deal.
ZeniMax issued a statement to WSJ noting it had “sent formal notice of its legal rights,” and that it “believes it is necessary to address these matters now and will take the necessary action to protect its interests.”
According to the report, ZeniMax has been seeking compensation from Oculus since August 2012, after Carmack was sent an early prototype of Oculus Rift by Palmer Luckey.
Carmack has demonstrated his modified version of the headset earlier that year during E3 that year, which ZeniMax claims was the “template for Oculus’s Rift headset,” according to the WSJ. Carmack mentioned at the convention that he created new software for the headset in order to make it a “workable product.”
In February 2014, ZeniMax requested that Carmack to disclose any VR inventions created while working at id. Come April 18, ZeniMax contacted Oculus’s lawyers as well as Facebook’s general counsel, Colin Stretch stating: “It was only through the concerted efforts of Mr. Carmack, using technology developed over many years at, and owned by, ZeniMax, that Mr. Luckey was able to transform his garage-based pipe dream into a working reality.”
Carmack became CTO at Oculus VR back in August 2013, before leaving id Software in November 2013 after attempting to convince ZeniMax to develop games for virtual reality and was turned down.
I doubt Carmack would have signed a contract like that since it would potentially allow zionmax to mess with his rocket business that he was running alongside ID when they were acquired by ZM. He's a smart guy and very important to ID so he would have been able to negotiate the contract he wanted.If he really did work for both at the same time and signed a typical corporate contract with Zenimax where they own everything he created while an employee... well... could get interesting.
Is anyone surprised? Think of how many lawsuits Zenimax files and it's always when they know they'll make a good payday. Just like with the Minecraft guy, the Fallout MMO, now this.
It sounds more like Zenimax thought that by landing Carmack’s talent to Oculus, they would be able to become a major shareholder and thus make money off Oculus’s VR tech. Note the comment on “equity ownership”. They basically expected to partially own Oculus Rift via Carmack’s involvement in the project.
Instead Carmack got excited about all the new tech and ran off from Zenimax to Oculus. The result is that instead of making money off shiny new VR tech, Zenimax lost one of the greatest programmers in the world.
All things considered, that is a major reason for extreme butthurt. No idea if they actually have the legal grounding to get back at Oculus, though, or if they’re just whining in public.
It's basically like working on a job and earning experience while doing it. Then leave the company and get sued for using your experience on a new job
Fuck Zenimax. And fuck Bethesda. Fuck both of them in the ass with the emergent dildo.
This makes me think that one of these days I'm gonna get sued by a bunch of faggots only because I decided to disclose some information about Fallout 3.
I bet Todd Howard laughs his ass off reading my posts, thinking 'Long time no see, Ingvar, enjoy looking like an idiot, when me, Bethesda team and Zenimax guys are done laughing, we'll get to you'.
Wait.
Shit.
Fixed for shameless monetization and profiteering.I agree that perhaps Zenimax's actions here are, ahem, auspicious.
RPS is using Codex slang now?
Interesting, to say the least. Depending on Carmack's contract he could indeed be screwed here - it's very common in technology-related industries for contracts to prevent work outside of the company for commercial gain, especially work that falls in that same category. It's actually quite possible that Carmack acted in the wrong here - though I agree that perhaps Zenimax's actions here are, ahem, specious.
Maybe it wasn't covered because it wasn't gaming-related. Sometimes the clause is only non-competitive and I doubt his rocketeering venture could be considered a competitor to Zenimax.Don't forget he also had his rocket company. There's no way he would agree to a condition like that.
Whoever wins, we lose.
Preserving this quote for the future, once the Rift takes off I'll put it in my .sigOculus is going to be DOA, why bother?
If you want to embarrass Metro, you can just randomly quote mine his "Build me a PC" thread. In any case, I hope he is right.Preserving this quote for the future, once the Rift takes off I'll put it in my .sigOculus is going to be DOA, why bother?