DraQ
Arcane
Isn't "butthurt" the proper term?
Ok, I just imagined future English with "butthurt" being a recognized, widespread and fully acceptable term for emotional suffering.
Not pretty.
Not pretty.
-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Everything that is wrong with these forums
- Thread starter Nevill
- Start date
Mustawd
Guest
Why does Infinitron get so much shit? 90% of his activities are news postings. He hardly even joins in discussions on Grpg (except for SITS thread..still don't understand that comment).
So he harvests bro fists...who here can say they have not?
So he likes Doritos...so fucking what? I like Doritos from time to time.
Leave Infinitron alone! Leave him alone! Anti-Semite bastards.....
thesoup
Arcane
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2011
- Messages
- 7,599
It's how we show him affection. We can't be openly pro-Semite.
Mustawd
Guest
^impressive message to brofisting ratio. *tips hat*
- Joined
- May 16, 2008
- Messages
- 18,150
Nevill
Arcane
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2009
- Messages
- 11,211
Taluntain.
If you have are on a page that starts with 'http://rpgcodex.net' and try to open a link that starts with "http://www.rpgcodex.net" - or vice versa - it always opens in a new tab. At least in Chrome.
Example:
If you have are on a page that starts with 'http://rpgcodex.net' and try to open a link that starts with "http://www.rpgcodex.net" - or vice versa - it always opens in a new tab. At least in Chrome.
Example:
On of those links will open in a new tab on click. Is that normal?
Last edited:
It's probably a XF setting somewhere that makes non-www links display with target="_blank" but I expect it's not the only such issue. I'm OCD about using www everywhere though so not really inclined to investigate this, but DarkUnderlord is a big fan of not using it, so I expect he'll want to fix this for you.
Or not.
Or not.
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2002
- Messages
- 28,357
If I say yes, does it mean I don't have to do anything?
Nevill
Arcane
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2009
- Messages
- 11,211
Well, there was an explanation for why the multiquoting does not work the way it does, so I suppose no one can force you to. 
As usual, I report nuisanses that annoy me most, and this issue mostly affects LPs and their tables of content. So it is hardly a critical bug that everyone would complain about. But it would be nice to see it fixed nonetheless.
As usual, I report nuisanses that annoy me most, and this issue mostly affects LPs and their tables of content. So it is hardly a critical bug that everyone would complain about. But it would be nice to see it fixed nonetheless.
flabbyjack
Arcane
I need to be able to ignore moderators.
Nevill
Arcane
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2009
- Messages
- 11,211
...so, is anyone going to do anything about at least some things listed in the thread? 
At least the ones that are 'easy':
Anyway, I've noticed the new behavior of Alerts. Or actually, Inbox alerts. See, earlier if you got an alert or a new answer in a conversation, and you hovered the mouse cursor over the button, a preview window with recent alerts popped up. And once it did, the alert was considered 'shown' and the number indicating how many you got disappeared.
It still acts this way with actual Alerts, but you need to click on conversations in the Inbox to make that red number disappear. I think it became this way a week or two ago. What was the logic behind this change? It creates an inconsistency when there was none before.
At least the ones that are 'easy':
Just curious, is all.
Anyway, I've noticed the new behavior of Alerts. Or actually, Inbox alerts. See, earlier if you got an alert or a new answer in a conversation, and you hovered the mouse cursor over the button, a preview window with recent alerts popped up. And once it did, the alert was considered 'shown' and the number indicating how many you got disappeared.
It still acts this way with actual Alerts, but you need to click on conversations in the Inbox to make that red number disappear. I think it became this way a week or two ago. What was the logic behind this change? It creates an inconsistency when there was none before.
Zep Zepo
Titties and Beer
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2013
- Messages
- 5,233
Every once in a while, some faggot posts about how something is broke on the forum. They be all THIS and THAT but i never experience those problems. It's obvious they are using some gayass neckbeard open-sores browser and the problem lies with them.
...so, is anyone going to do anything about at least some of the faggots in the thread?
Just curious, is all.
Zep--
...so, is anyone going to do anything about at least some of the faggots in the thread?
Just curious, is all.
Zep--
It's not that we don't want to, it's more of a "if it ain't broken to the point of being unusable, it can wait indefinitely" situation. And somebody shoot me the next time I assume something will be easy to find in the XF salad. 
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.