Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Prosper Excidium II misrepresents the Codex to the detriment of all of us

Excidium II is no gud for Codex


  • Total voters
    73

Severian Silk

Guest
wow, judging by the responses in this thread it's almost like the people here don't actually care about creating a welcoming internet space?

that's really disappointing and I wish I had known sooner
I do!
 

Mustawd

Guest
Root, you write very well m8. Prolly why your team won the Apprentice Round 1 so many months ago. :salute::salute:
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2016
Messages
450
Original Footage:

RiK6XUF.png

Why not just create account and say all this into Excidium II face. :rpgcodex:
 

thesoup

Arcane
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
7,599
I don't know about you guys, but I don't wanna be made fun of at neofag.
We should ban Excidium and everyone else they ask.
 

Riskbreaker

Guest
I assure you, there are no NeoGAF infiltrators 'round here. Indeed, such a thought is simply too preposterous to be seriously entertained for even a moment!
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom