Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

KickStarter Fig - a new equity-based crowdfunding platform - shut down, RIP

Unwanted

Irenaeus II

Unwanted
Dumbfuck Repressed Homosexual The Real Fanboy
Joined
Jun 9, 2015
Messages
3,251
Location
Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Desespero
I forgot how this works, are the returns on investment fixed in any way, such as a ceiling for returns? Maybe there's someone out there who believes in investing $1,000+ in a game from a purely personal finance angle.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2013
Messages
6,169
PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire Serpent in the Staglands Bubbles In Memoria A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire
I forgot how this works, are the returns on investment fixed in any way, such as a ceiling for returns? Maybe there's someone out there who believes in investing $1,000+ in a game from a purely personal finance angle.

From what I remember they sign a deal with real (I mean accredited) investors and then unaccredited investors get the same terms that the big boys negotiated.

It's part of the law, I think, to ensure inexperienced unaccredited investors get the protective influence of professional investors.
 

Mustawd

Guest
I forgot how this works, are the returns on investment fixed in any way, such as a ceiling for returns? Maybe there's someone out there who believes in investing $1,000+ in a game from a purely personal finance angle.


The old deal was that accredited investors going through the Fig website got an agreement of XYZ % of revenue up to your investment + a premium. So it was capped at an amount. Who knows what the structure for the investors who didn't invest through the website (aka family, friends, any VC firms, and Angel Investors).

Not sure if the terms of the new structure with non-accredited investors is up on the website yet.
 

Mustawd

Guest
I forgot how this works, are the returns on investment fixed in any way, such as a ceiling for returns? Maybe there's someone out there who believes in investing $1,000+ in a game from a purely personal finance angle.

From what I remember they sign a deal with real (I mean accredited) investors and then unaccredited investors get the same terms that the big boys negotiated.

It's part of the law, I think, to ensure inexperienced unaccredited investors get the protective influence of professional investors.


The law caps the amount an unaccredited investor can invest based on his/her income. Something like you can only invest up to 10% of your annual income per 12 month period, if I recall correctly.

EDIT: Here it is.

Additional Tier 2 Requirements



In addition to these basic requirements, companies conducting Tier 2 offerings would be subject to other requirements, including:
  • A requirement to provide audited financial statements.
  • A requirement to file annual, semiannual and current event reports.
  • A limitation on the amount of securities non-accredited investors can purchase in a Tier 2 offering of no more than 10 percent of the greater of the investor’s annual income or net worth.
 

Perkel

Arcane
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
15,858
Obsidian are set to announce a game funded by a publishing partner very soon. That publisher probably wouldn't agree with them campaigning for their own game within the same timeframe.

That doesn't make any sense.

- First of all PoE was done by small team. PoE2 has everything hard done already (engine, lore, game systems etc) so they can make PoE2 bigger even if they will use smaller amount of people.
- PoE was profiteable for them . PoE2 will be basically slam dunk.
- Making game for someone doesn't mean they will not be able to do anything else.
 

Infinitron

I post news
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
97,437
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
http://www.polygon.com/2015/12/1/9827884/literally-anyone-can-invest-in-figs-next-game

Literally anyone can invest in Fig's next game
Six months and more than $400,000 in legal fees has all led up to this

shutterstock_196873940.0.0.jpg


This month the crowdfunding start-up Fig will fulfill a promise it made when it launched this past August by opening equity investment in indie games to everyone, not just high net worth individuals. Previously Fig had only allowed accredited investors — those making more than $200,000 a year or with more than $1 million in assets — to take part in its campaigns. This next effort, Fig's third, will open the opportunity to everyone and allow individuals to invest between $1,000 and $10,000 in the success of an indie game.

Justin Bailey, formerly of developer Double Fine and now Fig's CEO, told Polygon that the acceptance of unaccredited investment removes a kind of "tension that was not about what we are at our core, which is always the idea that fans should be able to invest."

"I think it plays into a larger movement that’s happening," Bailey said. "I like to call it the democratization of society. They include the Uber movement [and other kinds of] on-demand economies. The investment piece is now being taken out of the hands of professional investors hands and it’s being opened up to everyone. Everyone is going to have the opportunity in the future to invest in things that they’re interested in, things that they follow and they know a lot about. ... They could probably make a better decision on which game they want to support, instead of going to the stock market and just picking a stock."

THE JOBS ACT
Under Regulation A+ of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act, signed into law in 2012, Fig will essentially form a publisher with the ability to raise investment from multiple sources — including unaccredited investors — for its next several games.

"That publisher has the right to raise up to $50 million," Bailey said. "That's in aggregate. We’re doing our first title in December, and the money we raise through unaccredited investment will come out of the maximum we're able to raise of $50 million. And the people who invest in that will then be tied to returns of that game. Then, when we do another project we just amend the filing [with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission] and we get to raise unaccredited money for that [game] as well. We keep on doing that until we've hit the $50 million cap."

Fig's next crowdfunding campaign, the third in its short history, will open up at least $1 million to unaccredited investment, which will represent an unknown fraction of that game's total budget. Neither the developer nor the game's title have been publicly announced.

When users arrive at Fig's site, they'll be able to use a custom-built calculator to predict the potential return on their investment. Users will be able to select an investment tier, adjust the suggested retail price of the game, and then use a slider to change the units sold. The calculator will then crunch the numbers based on the deal terms and output a return on their investment.

Fig was not able to release the deal terms to Polygon at this time. Bailey said they're still working on the language, and trying to make it as clear and concise as possible.



outer_wilds_large.0.png



THIRD TIME'S A CHARM
So far, Fig is one-for-two with its campaigns. The award-winning space exploration gameOuter Wilds was successful in August, but rewards-based backing was lower than anticipated. Developer Mobius Digital was initially willing to accept only $50,000 in investment, but Bailey told Polygon he eventually prevailed on the team to accept $75,000 — half of its total $125,000 ask — before the campaign closed in mid-September.

What the Outer Wilds campaign proved out for Fig was the tremendous amount of untapped capital interested in the games market. Bailey said that more than 80 individuals expressed interest in the game, representing a total of more than $900,000.

That total makes the failure of Fig's second campaign, a free-to-play title fromScribblenauts developer 5th Cell, all the more unexpected. Anchors In The Drift earned slightly more than $100,000 of its $500,000 ask. Since it did not meet its goal, no money changed hands.

"What I think happened last campaign," Bailey told Polygon, "is that we had some time on our hands before we could make this Regulation A+ filing [for our next campaign] and we wanted to experiment. We had so much investment interest in [Outer Wilds] that we wanted to take on a developer who was willing to take the whole campaign total in investment.

"We know that free-to-play games don't perform that well with rewards-only crowdfunding. So, we wanted to see if investment would work better — if that investment was available. And we just found out from the accredited investors that there just wasn't much interest in free-to-play games."

While Bailey wasn't able to share the next campaign with Polygon, he did reassure us that it would not be free-to-play.

"I don't think we will be putting a free-to-play game on the site for some time," Bailey said. "I'm not saying we won't ever do that again, it just doesn't seem to be the opportunity or the interest is on for crowdfunding. So, the other game is an indie, premium title."



fig_logo_full_word.0.png



RED TAPE
Fig itself has used investment capital to bring its crowdfunding service to life, including seed funding from Spark Capital, a venture capital firm that's played a key role in funding Oculus VR, Twitter and Slack. That investment was necessary, Bailey said, specifically for this next campaign. That's because the SEC filing alone cost his company more than $400,000.

"This is very much like going through an IPO [initial public offering]," Bailey said. "It's actually been referred to jokingly, and actually pretty accurately, as an IPO-lite. So we have to get fully audited, we have a law firm [and] very detailed financials. It's taking over 6 months to get this done."

Currently Fig's Regulation A+ filing is pending with the SEC, and it's not expected to close until after Fig's third campaign has ended. That means there may be some delay, Bailey said, before the developer actually gets the money investors promise. The risk of the filing being rejected outright by the SEC is extremely low.

"I don't have a percentage," Bailey said with a chuckle, "but it hasn't happened yet. It's more likely that the SEC would come back to us with questions, and we'd have to answer those questions."

If any further review of their filing is required, Bailey said, it would be to educate the SEC about how the games industry works.

"They would have industry-based questions is basically what it comes down to. We have very competent lawyers that have done this and worked very closely with the SEC for many, many years and know how to structure this stuff to minimize this risk."

NEXT STEPS
Bailey said that Fig has at least two more campaigns in the works, one of which could come as soon as January. He's very excited to extend the equity investment model to all of Fig's efforts, and sees it as part of the future of crowdfunding generally.

"We don’t want this friction between fans and investors," Bailey said. "We view them as one and the same. It was always something where we looked at Kickstarter, we knew they didn’t have any plans to allow investment, and so for us this is where we think crowdfunding is evolving to. It’s evolving to people that participate in these very early crowdfunding campaigns getting an opportunity to participate in the return of the games that they helped support.

"I think people are going to take interest in wanting to invest in other verticals, and probably start to wonder about all these things they're supporting on other crowdfunding sites. They're going to start to ask, 'Hey, why don’t they give me the opportunity to invest in those as well?'"
 
Self-Ejected

Davaris

Self-Ejected
Developer
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
6,547
Location
Idiocracy
At the time I knew D:OS was a winner and wished I could invest, so I think the idea is a good one. All they need is the right people running it and to get the best developers. :hype:
 
Last edited:
Self-Ejected

Davaris

Self-Ejected
Developer
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
6,547
Location
Idiocracy
I forgot how this works, are the returns on investment fixed in any way, such as a ceiling for returns? Maybe there's someone out there who believes in investing $1,000+ in a game from a purely personal finance angle.

From what I remember they sign a deal with real (I mean accredited) investors and then unaccredited investors get the same terms that the big boys negotiated.

It's part of the law, I think, to ensure inexperienced unaccredited investors get the protective influence of professional investors.


The law caps the amount an unaccredited investor can invest based on his/her income. Something like you can only invest up to 10% of your annual income per 12 month period, if I recall correctly.

EDIT: Here it is.

Additional Tier 2 Requirements



In addition to these basic requirements, companies conducting Tier 2 offerings would be subject to other requirements, including:
  • A requirement to provide audited financial statements.
  • A requirement to file annual, semiannual and current event reports.
  • A limitation on the amount of securities non-accredited investors can purchase in a Tier 2 offering of no more than 10 percent of the greater of the investor’s annual income or net worth.

I do not see them asking gamblers the same questions. I assume the Casino lobby group has more bribe moneyz.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 26, 2015
Messages
1,350
PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire Make the Codex Great Again! Grab the Codex by the pussy Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Bubbles In Memoria A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
Currently Fig's Regulation A+ filing is pending with the SEC, and it's not expected to close until after Fig's third campaign has ended. That means there may be some delay, Bailey said, before the developer actually gets the money investors promise. The risk of the filing being rejected outright by the SEC is extremely low.

So basically, they still can't legally do this yet. But they say they can.
:hmmm:
 

Infinitron

I post news
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
97,437
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
The description of fig.vc sounds exactly like fig.co's, except not for videogames.

Fig is a venture capital group providing a pragmatic new approach to supporting and investing in high-growth early-stage companies.

An experienced management team and advisory board carefully select companies before taking them to Fig's network of investors.

It's a got a similar tablety Windows Metro look, too. Funny.
 

Hegel

Arcane
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
3,274
It's a bit different. An early stage venture fund provides capital and guidance to fledgling startups under the form of network access, recruitment pool, brand exposure and operational experience (not unlike an incubator albeit different).
Fig (the crowdfunding site) mostly provides capital. Alas, most early-stage startups would kill for the chance of getting the amount of money Fig sponsored companies need to fund their own development costs (5-30 million is the upper limit at the early stage, of course the are funds that may allocate more. So, those 3 mil Shaffer is getting would be quite a lot for, say, the early - stage round of a biotech startup, which is telling of the costs associated with the development of a game).
 
Last edited:

MRY

Wormwood Studios
Developer
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
5,716
Location
California
This looks like a great Newgrounds flash game.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom