Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Review Forgotten Gems: Dark Sun: Shattered Lands

Elwro

Arcane
Joined
Dec 29, 2002
Messages
11,747
Location
Krakow, Poland
Divinity: Original Sin Wasteland 2
My gladiator certainly dealt a lot more damage than he should. I always thought this was due to the bonuses which are not explained anywhere in detail.
 

VentilatorOfDoom

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2009
Messages
8,600
Location
Deutschland
I mean, I indicated that I wasn't sure about it, but I could have sworn that Gladiators get a lot of bonuses too. The difference in melee performance compared to fighters can't be explained with -1AC.
 

made

Arcane
Joined
Dec 18, 2006
Messages
5,130
Location
Germany
I seems that images in FP articles don't show up when I block the GoG ad, which puts me in a bit of a dilemma.

Anyway, A for effort. Nice to see coverage of classics for a change.
 

kmonster

Augur
Joined
May 24, 2010
Messages
316
I had a gladiator in my party and I didn't notice any difference compared to the rangers and the fighter.
I'm absolutely sure he didn't get the extra attack warriors with grandmastery get.

For a succesful Ego Whip both a successful psionic check and a failed save are needed. The chance to fail is quite high, especially since non-psionics can't raise the skill and powerful monsters have good saves.
4 attacks per round with powerful weapons will do serious damage or even kill if you aren't very unlucky.
 

CraigCWB

Educated
Joined
Apr 17, 2010
Messages
193
I barely remember this game and I played it in the mid-90s which was at least a few years after it was released. I have no idea how people here are giving such detailed advice about it. Anyway, I played it during the RPG drought because there wasn't anything else to play, and I was pleasantly surprised how much fun I had with it. As I recall (and I already stipulated I don't recall it well) it only took me a couple days to finish it, though. Which back then made it a REALLY short game.
 
Self-Ejected

Excidium

P. banal
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
13,696
Location
Third World
Great setting, good game.

I never made much use of backstabbing either, it really isn't needed.
 

PorkaMorka

Arcane
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
5,090
It's possible that Gladiators get some sort of hidden and undocumented bonus but

I kind of suspect that most people made a half giant gladiator (since gladiators can't multiclasss, it's sort of pointless to multiclass half giants anyway, and you were sort of encouraged to multiclass everyone else)

Which would mean that your gladiator would be ridiculously powerful in melee for most of the game, what with +12 str bonus to damage, huge bonus to THAC0 as well, and *doubled hit dice*.

Any hidden gladiator bonus would have to be pretty big to compare to the half giant bonuses, heh.

Starting out with 78 hp and +12 damage in 2e is kind of a big deal.

Maybe I should replay this without a half giant.
 

Sceptic

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 2, 2010
Messages
10,872
Divinity: Original Sin
PorkaMorka said:
Maybe I should replay this without a half giant.
I have. It's not particularly harder but it does require some different tactics. Then again that was the run in which I replaced him with a Fighter/Thief, so the damage output didn't change much!

One thing that hasn't really been mentioned - encounters sometimes happen over vast areas. This is one of the few D&D games (especially compared to Gold Box) where offensive AoE spells aren't that useful and the "status" AoE spells really shine: Solid Fog, Rainbow Pattern, Chaos, etc. This is especially true with psionics: the direct-damage ones are utterly worthless while the telepathic ones are priceless. 1d6 damage or mass control over 4 enemies? discuss!
 

MicoSelva

backlog digger
Patron
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
7,484
Location
Vigil's Keep
Codex 2012 Codex 2013 Codex 2014 PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015 Codex 2016 - The Age of Grimoire Make the Codex Great Again! Grab the Codex by the pussy Insert Title Here RPG Wokedex Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming! Enjoy the Revolution! Another revolution around the sun that is. Serpent in the Staglands Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Divinity: Original Sin 2 Bubbles In Memoria A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. Pathfinder: Wrath I helped put crap in Monomyth
Nice review, a bit heavy on spoilers though. I can see that I've delayed checking this game out for too long. Judging from the article, it's something like KoTC done right (means: awesome).

On a side note, I remember reading a book (about 15 years ago...), which had defilers, priceless metal, etc. in it. I didn't realise that it was a Dark Sun book until now. How come this setting is so underused, while generic fantasy Forgotten Realms gets into 90% of D&D games?
 

CraigCWB

Educated
Joined
Apr 17, 2010
Messages
193
MicoSelva said:
Nice review, a bit heavy on spoilers though. I can see that I've delayed checking this game out for too long.

That's what I was thinking, back in the 1990s... SSI got bashed pretty bad for abandoning the Gold Box games and so I didn't play the Dark Sun games until they were in the bargain bin because everyone was saying they were crap. Fans can be their own worst enemy, sometimes.
 

GarfunkeL

Racism Expert
Joined
Nov 7, 2008
Messages
15,463
Location
Insert clever insult here
Well, it was a downgrade from Gold Box on certain aspects - only 4 members in your party instead of six, game length was shortened significantly when compared to GB and plenty of folks didn't like the UI&Graphix-changes.

The fact that you could have proper conversations and fights on a larger area weren't obvious at first, I think.
 

Sceptic

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 2, 2010
Messages
10,872
Divinity: Original Sin
MicoSelva said:
How come this setting is so underused, while generic fantasy Forgotten Realms gets into 90% of D&D games?
You've answered your own question I'm afraid. Majority of people LIKE generic stuff. That's why FR and Dragonlance were always more successful than Planescape or Dark Sun, in both P&P and video games.

GarfunkeL said:
game length was shortened significantly when compared to GB and plenty of folks didn't like the UI&Graphix-changes.
UI was a huge improvement over Gold Box one, which was clunky as hell. It was also very, very versatile: you could use mouse only, keyboard only, or anything in-between. As for lengths, the only long GB games were POD and DQOK. ALL the others were 20 hours or shorter, and that's including all sidequests. Hell I remember finishing the first 2 Krynn games in under 15 hours each. The only GB game that was longer (aside from the 2 already mentioned) was Silver Blades, and it was long for all the wrong reasons.

CraigCWB said:
SSI got bashed pretty bad for abandoning the Gold Box games
I was VERY pissed off at all the negative reaction the game got, especially in reviews, at the time. It got bashed for all the wrong reasons too: "clunky interface" from people who don't read instructions, "ugly graphics" from the graphic whores, "dated engine" (WTF is that supposed to mean?), "boring story" because for a change there is no epic saving the entire world but just saving the villages, and instead of gathering the pieces of the Sword Of Awesome you have to unite the villages instead... and of course the bugs, but that was the only criticism they got right. No one noticed the tactical depth of the combat, or the multiple solutions to everything, or the huge amount of customization with races/classes, the never-seen-before-in-CRPGs psionics, the originality of the setting... whole thing just made me rage. I think the only review that managed to properly critique the game was CGW's, but that's no big surprise.
 

Grunker

RPG Codex Ghost
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
27,415
Location
Copenhagen
Nice text, and good description of a good old game! Don't know if I'd call it a review as such though. It lacks a lot of techical details and game mechanic descriptions - like a chapter combat for example.
 

VentilatorOfDoom

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2009
Messages
8,600
Location
Deutschland
Grunker said:
Nice text, and good description of a good old game! Don't know if I'd call it a review as such though. It lacks a lot of techical details and game mechanic descriptions - like a chapter combat for example.

I know, and I said so at the beginning of the text. What sense makes a pure review about a 17 years old game anyway? I opted more to encourage younger players to check it out, that's why I included lots of tips/spoilers etc because a game without a journal, quest arrows and shit is probably pretty hard to pick up for today's gamers in the first place.
 

Grunker

RPG Codex Ghost
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
27,415
Location
Copenhagen
VentilatorOfDoom said:
Grunker said:
Nice text, and good description of a good old game! Don't know if I'd call it a review as such though. It lacks a lot of techical details and game mechanic descriptions - like a chapter combat for example.

I know, and I said so at the beginning of the text. What sense makes a pure review about a 17 years old game anyway? I opted more to encourage younger players to check it out, that's why I included lots of tips/spoilers etc because a game without a journal, quest arrows and shit is probably pretty hard to pick up for today's gamers in the first place.

Yep, I know, hence the less-than-harsh criticism. I still think a chapter explaining the combat would've been helpful, in lieu of your "DS for dummies"-line ;)
 

VentilatorOfDoom

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2009
Messages
8,600
Location
Deutschland
Grunker said:
Yep, I know, hence the less-than-harsh criticism. I still think a chapter explaining the combat would've been helpful, in lieu of your "DS for dummies"-line ;)

Bro, there isn't much to say about the combat mechanics themselves. It's turnbased, you can either let the AI handle your characters (retarded) or control them yourself. There's not much to do for you unless you're a caster of sorts. Switch between ranged or melee (right-click) and click on the target to initiate attack. If you can and want to cast a spell, choose the spell then aim the spell icon at the target or the range (if AoE). That's it.
 

Grunker

RPG Codex Ghost
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
27,415
Location
Copenhagen
VentilatorOfDoom said:
Grunker said:
Yep, I know, hence the less-than-harsh criticism. I still think a chapter explaining the combat would've been helpful, in lieu of your "DS for dummies"-line ;)

Bro, there isn't much to say about the combat mechanics themselves. It's turnbased, you can either let the AI handle your characters (retarded) or control them yourself. There's not much to do for you unless you're a caster of sorts. Switch between ranged or melee (right-click) and click on the target to initiate attack. If you can and want to cast a spell, choose the spell then aim the spell icon at the target or the range (if AoE). That's it.

Yep, I know, but at this prestigious forum playing games with all the iterations of RPG-combat (RTwP, TB, RT) and different variations of it, I thought it was worth a comment.
 

DemonKing

Arcane
Joined
Dec 5, 2003
Messages
6,009
I was a huge fan of the DS tabletop RPG but this game didn't quite capture the same feel for me, plus I didn't like the fact that your characters seemed to be pounding on everyone with their fists no mater what weapon they had.

Still, it was a fun enough game for the time, from memory.
 

SerratedBiz

Arcane
Joined
Mar 4, 2009
Messages
4,143
I have a crapload of good memories of playing Dark Sun when I was a younger lad. Most of them revolved around the fact that it felt challenging to my foolish, untwinkish mind, its visceral and gritty turn-based combat, and that you could often get different outcomes to various encounters. Definitely a game you can play more than once.
 

PorkaMorka

Arcane
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
5,090
GarfunkeL said:
Well, it was a downgrade from Gold Box on certain aspects - only 4 members in your party instead of six, game length was shortened significantly when compared to GB and plenty of folks didn't like the UI&Graphix-changes.

The fact that you could have proper conversations and fights on a larger area weren't obvious at first, I think.

Yeah, it wasn't a true upgrade over the Gold Box games.

4 man party is too few for good combat, and led to heavy mutliclassing in most parties. Game is also pretty easy and untactical most of the time.

Combat is much slower paced than in the Gold Box games.

IIRC you couldn't automate battles either.

Also everything was much smaller scale, probably due to the loss of the battlescape. You already mentioned how short the game was too.

Plus dungeon crawling is much less challenging with the pure overhead view.

Graphics are better, but look stupid due to the "beating everything with your fists" problem that someone mentioned.

Overall, you might look at this as the start of the decline as traditional RPG gameplay started to be compromised for storyfag elements and broader appeal. Since we started from such lofty heights, it is still a good game though.
 

guenthar

Novice
Joined
Jan 15, 2008
Messages
2
I found out what causes the final battle not to trigger in Dark Sun: Shattered Lands. If you leave the messenger's scroll (that tells about the army coming) then it will cause the final battle not to happen. You have to remove it before you go back to Teaquetzl after getting the alliance with the last village. (it won't work after that) I had been trying to figure out for awhile why the final battle wouldn't start and had save games just before going back to Teaquetzl and just before leaving the ruins with the genie. Until I did what I said above the battle wouldn't start.

PS. Someone else mentioned waiting till Laussa leaves the area to join the tribe before leaving the area so I did. I suggest doing this just in case there are actually 2 reasons why this happens.
 

Elwro

Arcane
Joined
Dec 29, 2002
Messages
11,747
Location
Krakow, Poland
Divinity: Original Sin Wasteland 2
So, could you clarify this: should one leave the scroll or not? In your 2nd sentence you're saying one shouldn't; in the 3rd you say that one should "remove it". Which is it?

Thaks for the investigation! If it works, that's a worthy piece of information!
 

Waterd

Augur
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
228
I did this for another site (sirlin.net) But i thought someone here may be interested. Sadly it seems most of my coding is lost in the process I'm working on improving it both in formatting and information. I posted this here because maybe someone find it interesting.

Play Darksun shattered for first time or rerun:

0.Introduction:
I write this guide in order to help improve the experience of playing Darksun: Shattered lands to those that want to try this game for first time. It's an old game, with design flaws and a manual that is worthless for the most part, in addition is somewhat bugged. But I think some of the concepts of this game are top material and I think anyone interested in the design of RPG should experience DS:SL because it does so many things so well, even if it does many things so wrong. The main intention of this guide is to help new players to find a challenge in this game. DS:SL has many too overpowered stuff (as most RPG actually), and my intention is to point it out so players don't use that.
In addition to provide some help in creating chars so the player doesn't end with a useless or boring group.
Also commenting on things from the manual i thing are relevant as the Manual is very long but with a lot of incorrect information.

1.The overpowered things: I will divide this in tiers from most broken stuff to thing that I think are kind of too strong but are not so to the point of making the challenge obsolete:

Tier 1: Playing with this makes the game a right click game.

a) Psionic power: Mass domination
Explanation: Im not a master of d&d nor much less. However I think Dominate monster is a 9th level spell (wizard level 18) and its pretty good. I know some CRPG have the mass dominate spell which is broken no matter how you slice it. But at least you need a level 18 wizard or similar. However most version have a very small AOE or just can only target around 3 targets. Since it's a very high level spell, you are also limited on how many times you can cast them per fight or rest.

Now imagine having mass domination in a level 3 character, and instead of 3 targets you have 5. Yes it's that broken, It's the most broken thing I ever saw in any RPG game, and I really would like to ask the designers what where they thinking. So just don't learn this power.

b) Race: Half-giant

Explanation: Here are the half-giant stats
+4 Str -5 Dex +2 Con -5 Int -3 Wis -3 Chr. I will talk about stats later, but anyone with some experience in d&d will know that those stats cry op. But this just half the story. Half-giants get DOUBLE HP bonus from constitution. And we are talking about a race that get +2 in constitution. Half giants are just the power houses of darksun, and it pains me to say "don't use it" because with my experience with darskun players, half-giant are the favorite race of many. I don't know at this point if its atmoshphere reasons, or they just have fun to have someone that can smash everyone to pieces while being unkillabe tanks of destruction. This is just not about fighters. Half giant make the best race for
any class they can pick.

c) Weapon: Dual-wielding.
I find in most RPGS dual-wielding is underpowered. Here is not like that, here dual wielding is the nuts. When you dual wield in darksun you get DOUBLE the attacks. The penalty? What penalty?.
Add to that you can carry a heavy weapon and a normal weapon. It makes every other form of attack look like a joke and most of the game a joke in itself. Don't carry a weapon in each hand.

Tier 2: Quite OP stuff, but if you want to use them, go ahead, it doesn't remove all challenge of the game unlike Tier 1 stuff, it just makes it quite easy.

a) Cleric/druid spell: Hold person.
This is the little brother of Mass domination, but is instead hold person. Holding is not as strong as controlling. But is still makes any human in the game just a joke. In every other CRPG I know this is a higher level spell that can target one creature or monster. Reasonable. Here you can target 4. Which is crazy, and you do double damage to paralyzed humans+less AC.
So, if you use this spell, be prepared to make every humanoid creature a joke. The only reason this isn't tier 1 is because many powerfull enemies in the game are not humanoid.

b) Preserver spell: Haste:
This is the 3rd most broken spell. Making every ally have double attacks and double speed for practically infinite time. Just the way to go ahead and convert every PC in a killing machine. D&D now a days have haste and still a core spell, and it doesn't last as long nor gives DOUBLE attacks, just an extra attack.

Tier 3: Slightly OP stuff that I prefer not to use, but the game is still challenging using them.

a) Multi-class: Multi-class is supposedly balanced around that you get half the XP or a third XP than you should. But since the cap is low that is not a big deal. And having a wizard with the HP and armor restrictions of a fighter (which means none) is just too good. For that reason I don't use multiclassing
(except maybe for the thief class, more on that later). I think Multi-classing is too good in darksun but I know a lot of people love to multi class and i don't think it's so OP as to not use it if you think its fun. Also you can make an exception for the thief and the cleric (because a pure cleric and pure thiefs sucks imo) However I think human dual classing may be ok (not sure).

b) Rest scumming:
When I play I think the best way is to use each rest spot and each heal spot (healing chambers and npc clerics) just one with the exception of prison rest (which I can use once per Arena visit). The problem with this is that you have to keep track of it (I do in a notepad but it can be a hassle to you) which is the only reason i don't recommend it.

c) Prebuffing: Getting free rounds of buffs sure makes casters OP right? yes it does and specially if you know a fight is ahead it can make any fight very easy (if you combine it also with rest scumming be prepared with just winning every fight a lot easier). Prebuffing is a hassle. And is also OP. I strongly suggest to not do it, specially if you are gonna do rest scumming. However prebuffing stacks in power a lot with many things I mentioned. Specially multi classing and rest scumming. how is that? Well having a fighter that before each fight cast on itself all cleric psionic buffs...yeah. Specially with no penalty since it can do that before every fight (rest scumming) however, without rest scumming and multiclassing, its actually not that much OP.


2. Creating your party:

Ok Now that you know how to make the game more challenging by knowing what things break the game. Let's
go with helping in making a party that can survive.
If you want go ahead and use the prearranged party the game gives you (which is pretty broken btw with
all maxed stats chars). But I think its more fun to create your own party.

But to do that you need to know what each race and class do, more or less. I played many rpg and I think its very frustrating to be mid game to realize your monk is a piece of crap compared to your barbarian, or that you wonder why you have a wizard instead of a sorcerer. (generally making me start all over)
So this is intended so you get what you expect.

How you create a character?
First pick your race, then go ahead and pick your class (or classes if you are gonna multi class), then
roll the dice, set your character Psionics, Set your character elemental sphere (if he is Cleric, druid or ranger) finally Set your character name and you are ready to go (I think you can edit your character name at any point)

First the stats:
Str: Strength define your chances to hit on melee as well to help your melee damage
Dex: Increase your chances to hit at range as well as increase your Dodge AC
Con: Affect the amount of hitpoints you have as well as helps to determine the chances to successfully use most psychokinetic and pyschometabolic abilities without failing, also slightly affect your amount of psy points.
Int: Pretty useless only slightly affect your ammount of psy points. Also it determines the chances of succeed of a very few telepathic abilities.
Wis: Determine the amount of clerical type spells you can cast per level as well as being the major determiner on the amount of psy points you have. It also determines your chance of succed of most of the telephatic abilities. finally wisdom increase saving throws. (if constitution or Dexterity also influece saving throws I have no information)
Chr: Pretty useless, if your leader has high enough chr he will be given a few extra options in conversations at some points in the game.

Classes:
Classes set what armor and weapons you can use, they also define some special skills, and what magic abilities you can use. Each class have different requirements in XP to level up. Finally Classes determine your minimum STATS. When you roll the dice, if you roll a number less than X, your stat is X instead. If you multi-class the minimal stats is the highest of any of your classes.

Combat oriented:
Fighter: M.Stats: 17/9/9/9/9/9. Fighters can use any type of armor or weapon. They get extra attacks at later levels. They get a Max of 10 HP per level. They reach 9th level at 250,000 XP.

Gladiator: M.Stats: 17/13/13/13/13/13. Gladiators can use any type of armor or weapon. They get extra attacks at later levels. They get a max of 10 HP per level. They reach 9th level at 300,000 XP. They get an extra AC point when they reach 5th level. Gladiators can't multi-class.

Ranger: M.Stats: 14/14/14/14/17/14. Rangers can use any type of armor or weapon. They get extra attacks at later levels. They get a max of 10 HP per level. They reach 9th level at 300,000 XP. They get level 1 clerical spells when they reach level 8.

Comment: The combat oriented classes are very similar one to another, with very small perks or differences. It really doesn't matter which one you take, as long as you have at least one in your team.

If you decide to go multiclass. Have in mind that you can use all armor and weapons anyway even if you pick restricted classed. Which makes multi-classing into ranger or fighter very powerfull.

Clerical type:

Cleric: M.Stats: 9/9/9/9/17/9. Clerics can use any type of armor. They are very restricted on the weapons they can use and it's defined by it's elemental sphere.

Air: No melee weapons, Any ranged weapon.
Earth: Obsidian, metal and wood weapons. (that is basically the most important types of weapons so it's almost everthing)
Fire: Obsidian weapon
Water: Bone or wood weapons.

They get a Max of 8 Hp per level. They reach 9th level at 225,000 XP. Clerics can cast all non-elemental clerical spells up to level 3. They also are able to cast all the clerical spells of the sphere of choosing. Clerics get Turn undead ability. (which is one of the most powerful turn undead I've seen in a D&D game)

Druid: M.Stats: 12/12/12/12/17/12. Druids can use any weapon, but they can't use any armor.They get a Max of 8 Hp per level. They reach 9th level at 225,000 XP. Druids can cast all non elemental clerical spells up to level 5. And the clerical spells of the sphere of choosing.

Comment: Druid is gonna be the way to go. But some races can't be druid. However, being unable to cast non elemental clerical spells at level 4 and 5 is gonna be a bummer for most people (that means no cure critical wounds and the likes, isn't that the reason we pick these kind of chars?). Druids also get slightly better minimal stats.
However druid unable to use armor is a pain. Also while turn undead is extremly powerful, the amount of undead in the game is way less than almost any other D&D I have played. I want to stress that most people will hate the cleric, so if you want a "cleric" go with druid unless you know what you are doing.

The rest:

Preserver: M.stats: 9/9/9/17/9/9. Preserver can only use quarterstaff, slings, daggers and some magical weapons. They can't use any armor. They get a Max of 6 HP per Level. They reach 9th level at 125,000 XP. Preservers are the only ones that can cast arcane magic.

Psionicist: M.stats: 12/12/12/12/17/12. Psionicist can only use small/light weapons, They can only use leather-type armor. They get a max of 6 HP per level. They reach 9th level at 200,000 XP. Psionicst get psionic powers.

Note: Generally psionicist will focus on Psychometabolism or telepathy. The first one is about autobuffing your char for melee combat, and the second is about ranged attacks. The truth is that the only race worth to focus on Psychometabolism is the thri-kreen. (since can't use armor and have 4 arms to mutate) A psionicst thri-kreen with Psychometabolism is pretty powerfull, but anything else really blows imo. However Telepatic psionics are powerfull regardless of race. However you should use powers of the 3 classes regardless.
A notice is that Psionicist leaders are one of the three only thing that affects dialogs and options in the game (along with Charisma and Thief class).

Thief: M.stats 9/17/9/9/9/9. Can use all weapons. Can only use leather-type armor. They get a max of 6HP per level. They reach 9th level at 110,000 XP. Thiefs can Backstab: If they attack a unit from the opposite direction that it was attacked the last time, he gets bonus to hit and to damage.

Note: Thief along with psionics and Charisma are the only character traits that can affect dialogues and options. While there are traps and whatnot. There are a very few things that can't be solved in non-thief ways. I find thief's pretty weak. But I think many people enjoy the idea of playing a thief. For that reason, even if you decide to not multiclass. You can make an exception for Thiefs.

Races:

Humans: Stats: None Classes: all. Special: Humans can't multiclass, instead can Dual class which is a weird long to explain thing and I won't.

Dwarves: Stats: +1 Str +2 con -1 Dex -2 Chr Classes: Cleric, Fighter, Gladiator, Psionicist, Thief.

Elf: Stats: +2 Dex -2 Con +1 Int -1 Wis Classes: All but Druid. Special: The manual says that they can't be revived by clerical spells. But I don't know if its true, never tested it since I never pick elfs.

Half-Elf: +1 Dex -1 Con Classes: All

Half giant: +4 Str -5 Dex +2 Con -5 Int -3 Wis -3 Chr. Classes: Cleric, Fighter, Gladiator, Psionicist, Ranger. Special: Double hit points.

Halfling: -2 Str +2 Dex -1 con +2 Wis -1 Chr. Classes: All but preserver.

Mul: +2 Str +1 Con -1 int -2 Chr Classes: All but preserver and ranger

Thri-Kreen: +2 dex +1 Wis -1 Int -2 Chr Classes: All but Preserver and thief. Special: Can't wear armor.
5 AC natural armor. 4 natural attacks (instead of 1 of other chars). 1 extra Attack that has a chance to paralyze. 15 movement isntead of 12 of other races.

3.FAQ:

A) There are important bugs that I should know?:
The game has a lot of bugs but few game breaking.

The most important thing is a bug that happens around 5% of the runs, and forbid you to finish the game (!!!).
There are 3 things that rumors say diminish the chances for it to ever happen
1) Sometimes characters say they will leave a place, you should wait for them to leave the map.
2) If you find any note in a body talking about "the army" you should pick it up in your inventory.
3) Having the 1.1 version of the game (you can go to options with TAB and ABOUT to see the version of your game)

Another bug that may be important is in the spiders cave. if you see black spiders save. There are 2 bug related to it. One has to do with a bug (though is recorded in the manual so some may call it a feature) that if you go too far away from an ally. The ally will just dissapear.
1) the first one is after "saving" a group of black spiders, though for purpoose of quest, you save them even if you run like hell and lose them all, it's nice to have them to fight with you. However trying to save EVERYONE is almost impossible since they block each other out and they stop moving for one reason or another. However, try to get 1 or 2 spiders not get lost, is a reasonable goal that you should aim for.

2) In that same cave The most important Spider that may help you is the Prince of spiders. Don't run too far from him or he won't help you.

B) If I have an ally in battle, will he turn on me if I attack him?.

Hell yes. Even if it's a mind controlled one. If you even dare to do slight damage, they will unleash the full wrath on you until you die. So be careful with that. This is specially important in the already named Cave of black spiders since it's very hard to know which ones are on your side and which aren't (There are 2 rules for that. Any Mage spider is enemy, and look what each spider attack. If they attack a spider that is known to be ally or you, they are enemy)

C) Is there a quest that if I fail, will make it impossible to finish the game?
No, You can fail at every quest and still get to the ending. There are some quests that trigger the final quest. But that is they trigger the final quest regardless of if you complete the quests or fail. you have to succeed or fail to trigger it though.
 

hal900x

Augur
Joined
Jul 2, 2009
Messages
573
Location
A good place to own a gun.
This game has the perfect combination of story and combat for me. I will never forget Dagolar's lair. I guess either I just happened to avoid the OP tactics and party makeup, or else I just suck at min-maxing...thank God. Reading these kinds of guides is always interesting at first, but I always end up regretting having read them. The game always seems that much more empty afterward. Maybe read this only after your first playthrough.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom