Sigourn
uooh afficionado
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2016
- Messages
- 5,656
Never talked about Grimoire's aesthetics here, though. Only that I agreed with the reviewer who recognized 2017 is a thing.
Sorry if this upsets nostalgia fags.
-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Never talked about Grimoire's aesthetics here, though. Only that I agreed with the reviewer who recognized 2017 is a thing.
Sorry if this upsets nostalgia fags.
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2012
- Messages
- 1,879,250
You see, you're not even interested in actual discussion. Your lazy trolling is not even entertaining.
Go play your [CURRENT YEAR] games instead.
Sigourn
uooh afficionado
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2016
- Messages
- 5,656
Iznaliu
Arbiter
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2016
- Messages
- 3,686
People should care about whether their chosen candidate is good, not whether their chosen candidate upsets their opponents.
Kuattro
Augur
It's your first day on the internet, ain't it?
Iznaliu
Arbiter
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2016
- Messages
- 3,686
Just because something is commonplace doesn't mean you can't call it out.
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.