I just did.kingcomrade said:Lumpy create a poll then:
"Vault Dweller"
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
No shit.That's pathetic, DU. This poll sucks because it's meaningless. The poll options don't refer to things that should be done by anyone in particular, but rather what we wish came to happen.
DarkUnderlord said:At the moment, I'm all for ploughing on and seeing where the Codex ends up and if in a few months time, the Codex has gone down the toilet because Nedrah doesn't post news in the VD fashion and people can't handle that, well, we might reconsider. Until then, not really no. Not for a poll that's essentially hovering around 50/50, given a number of votes for A have been pre-conditioned with comments like "I prefer C but voted A" or "A but if you guys are going to be around more then C".
I like the way you're thinking.Rina said:How would you like your Vault Dweller?
Naked, handcuffed in my bed. <3
For the record, the poll started out at 80% for A, hovered around 70% - 66% for A for quite a while, then steadily dropped down to as low as about 57% but has ended up hovering around the 60% mark, not sure if it quite wants to go over or stay under. Thus is the history of the poll.roshan said:Actually the poll has been a very stable 60:40 since the beginning.
Yes, I am aware of that. A number of people have stated that they want to see more active administration and voted based on whether or not they felt that was going to actually happen or not. We have decided to try more active administration and see how it goes as I put much more weight on the comments than on whether or not people can adequately judge what option A, B or C actually mean. It is clear to me however, that given the nature of the poll and those comments, that people would love VD to return and for us to keep a lid on the more aggressive lulzers but also want a more active administration staff and other people involved. We're going to try that and see how it goes. In other words, the poll is not at 60% VD with an overwhelming number of comments like "Fuck off DarkUnderlord and Calis, what the fuck do you think you're doing? Vault Dweller 4 lief!". If that had been the case, then yes, we would have reconsidered.roshan said:And dont forget that a lot of the "C" votes are preconditioned by other administrators taking a more active role in the forums, otherwise, they would rather have voted A than C.
We are aware of that. However, we are willing to give it a shot as irrespective of whether Vault Dweller came back or not, we would have needed new news staff and other people to write articles. I am confident those people exist and that we can find them and train them into Codex newsies. So far the people we have found appear to be doing a stand-up job. We are happy with their progress and their willingness to take advice onboard.LRP said:And in any case, a mere eight percent voted excluding him altogether. Do you really think you have months to take a wait and see approach? Not to belittle or make less of new people that have stepped in to try to fill VD's spot, but those are big shoes to fill and since he'll not be really chiming in at this site, I hope he finds a voice at another forum.
Please accept that you are not aware of every conversation that takes place nor the various options that Calis and I were considering.Brother None said:If you were never intending to execute people's opinions if they didn't agree with you, why ask them?
DarkUnderlord said:Please accept that you are not aware of every conversation that takes place nor the various options that Calis and I were considering.Brother None said:If you were never intending to execute people's opinions if they didn't agree with you, why ask them?
DarkUnderlord said:This is our forum, not yours. If we decide to take a particular course of action, that's our call. If we decide to start a poll for the general users about it, that's our call. If we decide to ignore the result of that poll, that's your problem, not ours. The Codex is not a democracy (of its general forum populace). In short, this is our playpen and we're in charge. If you don't like that, GTFO.
A question. If that is the case, what exactly is the point of this poll? Why not make a poll simply:DarkUnderlord said:In other words, the poll is not at 60% VD with an overwhelming number of comments like "Fuck off DarkUnderlord and Calis, what the fuck do you think you're doing? Vault Dweller 4 lief!". If that had been the case, then yes, we would have reconsidered.
To be fair, the very first rule from this rather recent post:Brother None said:This is farcical, and you're being hypocritical. Again, if you couldn't guarantee people that their opinion would matter, tell them, if their opinion still doesn't matter now, tell them... But don't ask my opinion and when I'm doing explaining it say "well tough shit because I don't care."
Did anyone really ever expect this or any other numbnuts poll to dictate Caliphate policy?DarkUnderlord said:This is our forum, not yours. If we decide to take a particular course of action, that's our call. If we decide to start a poll for the general users about it, that's our call. If we decide to ignore the result of that poll, that's your problem, not ours.
DarkUnderlord said:This is our forum, not yours. If we decide to take a particular course of action, that's our call. If we decide to start a poll for the general users about it, that's our call. If we decide to ignore the result of that poll, that's your problem, not ours. The Codex is not a democracy (of its general forum populace). In short, this is our playpen and we're in charge. If you don't like that, GTFO.
A question. If that is the case, what exactly is the point of this poll? Why not make a poll simply:
A) Fuck off DarkUnderlord and Calis, what the fuck do you think you're doing? Vault Dweller 4 lief!
B) Fuck off Vault Dweller, what the fuck do you think you're doing? DarkUnderlord and Calis 4 lief!
and then see where it leads? It would make sense to me, as it looks like a compromise solution simply isn't happening.
vrok said:VD got voted down by the rest of the management. They > You. You = fail.
Go away troll.
Make that 4.sqeecoo said:@Maršal You know, there are not so many posters on the codex. 3 croatians is a lot!
Brother None said:Funny how that edict came from a management that got voted down, isn't it?
Do you get it this time?vrok said:VD got voted down by the rest of the management.