Jaesun
Fabulous Ex-Moderator
How is this a General RPG Gaming Discussion?
luckyb0y said:nomask7 said:luckyb0y said:The Protocols of the Elders of Zion?
Why not? Why would anyone with a functional brain trust a Jews' newspaper, when it discredits a document like the Protocols?
Are you for real? It's a proven forgery. Russians fucking admitted it. Not some random Jewish newspaper spreading propaganda.
luckyb0y said:nomask7 said:You should read Arthur Jensen, for one:
http://www.amren.com/ar/1992/08/
ht tp://www.amren.com/ar/1992/09/
So how one largely not accepted theory is more true than others? Because it says what you want? Even Jensen said that he only claimed there is a difference in the distribution of IQ but we lack satisfactorily scientific explanation why it is so. Yet in the earlier post you try to apply the mendelian rules to it. To claim that something as complex as intelligence, which can't be even clearly defined and reliably measured is inherited that way is just too much.
luckyb0y said:nomask7 said:The Jews aren't a nation, some people persistently claim. The following is primarily from Jews' own writings and statements:
So this is what all the Jews think, right? Right?
Exactly the question I was asking. Because it clearly indicates that bolshevism wasn't meant to serve anyone. I could provide you with proof of genocides on Jews during 1919-1920 years executed by Red Army troops. (And yeah, your "Zionist" friend Trocki was commisary of war at the time, and with Stalin being "politruk" in Red Army)Also, if bolshevism or communism isn't Jewish, then what is it? I mean, what is it for? (Is this question too deep for someone whose interest is limited to "history"?) Is communism for the workers, the unpriviliged, by various empathic individuals regardless of race? If it is, then why were the first decades of the USSR the most destructive ones for the peasants and workers of the USSR, those exact decades during which the Jews were dominant?
Someone accused you of lack of wits.Someone accused me of uncritical reading of history. I'll accuse that someone of superficial reading of mostly fabricated history, fabricated by the Soviet Jews. Poland was an official part of the USSR for quite a while, wasn't it (until 1989)? What makes the reading superficial is the inability to see beyond numbers and dates.
nomask7 said:It's a forgery all right, but to be a forgery there has to be something from which the forgery was made. Of course, there's that French writer. And that is, more or less, where we are supposed to stop tracking the "original": Oooh! A French writer criticizing Napoleon! Now I can finally sleep again! ('Sleep', as a metaphor.)
To conclude, I am supposed to believe that it's only the pre-Soviet, Russian secret police who can make forgeries or use plagiarization for their own purposes?
nomask7 said:That is one big straw man if I ever saw one. You should learn to think and read and write and, if you must, re-read, since as an environmentalist you probably believe you can.
luckyb0y said:Not necessarily, no. It is, as I at the least implied earlier, what the Jewish leaders think and want their Jewish sheeple (sheep people) to think. And good for them. Though bad for us, since their collective interests conflict badly with those of the Western Civilization and the White race.
caliban said:Make up your mind; or did you never learn how to do that?
Coherent thinking is a sign of mental deficiency! Of course, you simply do not posses the proper intellectual capacity to properly grasp this statement, so I'll try to explain it in a simple fashion: Cleve is a genius, a true visionare, his intellect is so vast that you can't seriously expect his thoughts to follow any patterns. He is aware of EVERY FACT IN THE UNIVERSE at the same time!
How dare you expect a man who is able to reconcile classical quantum mechanics with general relativity, predict the future 50 years ahead and single-handedly solve all problems contemporary biomedical sciences are facing - ALL AT THE SAME TIME! - to lower himself to our level? How can a mind of such surpassing brilliance be understood by those of lesser intelligence?
It is impossible. We can only bask in His glory and look up to Him for enlightenment.
Cleveland Mark Blakemore said:I will give you an anecdote, though.
I knew a guy in the Army who was in charge of the fuel depo. Each day when I came up to the motor pool I noticed him smoking, in itself a serious breach of his duties. Much worse, he frequently used sawdust to soak up fuel spills and instead of disposing it in the requisite manner, he scooped it up and left it to dry out in a bin nearby. It was such an appallingly reckless practice that I expected an explosion in the fuel depo almost every day.
At least three times a week I'd call out to him inside the fenced depo as I passed, "Private 'Smith,' you know that's basically a bomb you're sitting on that you manufactured, right?" He'd always sneer and say "Yeah, well it ain't happened yet, so I doubt if it ever will, PFC Blakemore. You're a panic merchant, mind your own business."
Of course, the inevitable day arrived and the entire fuel depo exploded into one of the worst raging fires in the history of the post. Incredibly, this guy survived with only third degree burns and the loss of several of his fingers. An investigation later on by the base commander revealed so many violations of safety concerns that there were disciplinary actions all the way up the chain of command from this guy. One day a full colonel stopped to speak to me and in the course of talking politely he mentioned that he had heard I was very paranoid about the conditions in the fuel depo before the accident happened. He asked me if I wanted the job. I told him that I was not willing to take it until several soldiers had managed to burn themselves to death because I thought the problem was Darwinian, not a matter of communication. He laughed really hard at that and a month later just sent down instructions I was to be put in charge of the fuel depo in the motor pool for a while until a qualified replacement was found for the job.
miles foreman said:Cleveland Mark Blakemore said:I will give you an anecdote, though.
I knew a guy in the Army who was in charge of the fuel depo. Each day when I came up to the motor pool I noticed him smoking, in itself a serious breach of his duties. Much worse, he frequently used sawdust to soak up fuel spills and instead of disposing it in the requisite manner, he scooped it up and left it to dry out in a bin nearby. It was such an appallingly reckless practice that I expected an explosion in the fuel depo almost every day.
At least three times a week I'd call out to him inside the fenced depo as I passed, "Private 'Smith,' you know that's basically a bomb you're sitting on that you manufactured, right?" He'd always sneer and say "Yeah, well it ain't happened yet, so I doubt if it ever will, PFC Blakemore. You're a panic merchant, mind your own business."
Of course, the inevitable day arrived and the entire fuel depo exploded into one of the worst raging fires in the history of the post. Incredibly, this guy survived with only third degree burns and the loss of several of his fingers. An investigation later on by the base commander revealed so many violations of safety concerns that there were disciplinary actions all the way up the chain of command from this guy. One day a full colonel stopped to speak to me and in the course of talking politely he mentioned that he had heard I was very paranoid about the conditions in the fuel depo before the accident happened. He asked me if I wanted the job. I told him that I was not willing to take it until several soldiers had managed to burn themselves to death because I thought the problem was Darwinian, not a matter of communication. He laughed really hard at that and a month later just sent down instructions I was to be put in charge of the fuel depo in the motor pool for a while until a qualified replacement was found for the job.
Have you told this lie so many times now that you actually believe it happened?
What kind of fuel was it? What base were you stationed at? What year?
Is that where you got your asspie diagnosis?
...and it's depot, not depo.
Cleveland Mark Blakemore said:miles foreman said:Cleveland Mark Blakemore said:I will give you an anecdote, though.
I knew a guy in the Army who was in charge of the fuel depo. Each day when I came up to the motor pool I noticed him smoking, in itself a serious breach of his duties. Much worse, he frequently used sawdust to soak up fuel spills and instead of disposing it in the requisite manner, he scooped it up and left it to dry out in a bin nearby. It was such an appallingly reckless practice that I expected an explosion in the fuel depo almost every day.
At least three times a week I'd call out to him inside the fenced depo as I passed, "Private 'Smith,' you know that's basically a bomb you're sitting on that you manufactured, right?" He'd always sneer and say "Yeah, well it ain't happened yet, so I doubt if it ever will, PFC Blakemore. You're a panic merchant, mind your own business."
Of course, the inevitable day arrived and the entire fuel depo exploded into one of the worst raging fires in the history of the post. Incredibly, this guy survived with only third degree burns and the loss of several of his fingers. An investigation later on by the base commander revealed so many violations of safety concerns that there were disciplinary actions all the way up the chain of command from this guy. One day a full colonel stopped to speak to me and in the course of talking politely he mentioned that he had heard I was very paranoid about the conditions in the fuel depo before the accident happened. He asked me if I wanted the job. I told him that I was not willing to take it until several soldiers had managed to burn themselves to death because I thought the problem was Darwinian, not a matter of communication. He laughed really hard at that and a month later just sent down instructions I was to be put in charge of the fuel depo in the motor pool for a while until a qualified replacement was found for the job.
Have you told this lie so many times now that you actually believe it happened?
What kind of fuel was it? What base were you stationed at? What year?
Is that where you got your asspie diagnosis?
...and it's depot, not depo.
Do you catalogue your own bowel movements? If so, what do you plan to do with the detailed records you have kept over the years? Are they mentioned in your effects in your will?
Are you trying to correct my spelling now? What, is your grammar and spelling supposedly better than my own? What other superpowers do you possess, besides ultra anal fixation?
Do you know what kind of fuel is used in the military? There's a good project for you.
Have you told the lie about your own heterosexuality for so long you now believe it yourself? There's a good project for you.
When was the last time you lived away from your parents? There's a good project for you.
Do you catalogue your own bowel movements? If so, what do you plan to do with the detailed records you have kept over the years? Are they mentioned in your effects in your will?
Are you trying to correct my spelling now? What, is your grammar and spelling supposedly better than my own? What other superpowers do you possess, besides ultra anal fixation?
Do you know what kind of fuel is used in the military? There's a good project for you.
Have you told the lie about your own heterosexuality for so long you now believe it yourself? There's a good project for you.
When was the last time you lived away from your parents? There's a good project for you.
I have heard old people who went through death camps speak about them.
Touching.nomask7 said:The Soviet Jews who controlled Poland and therefore Auschwitz also liked the four million figure:
Then suddenly in 1989 (hmm, what ever happened that year in Poland?), someone decided the "estimate" should be decreased to one and a half million:
Xor said:Nomask hasn't responded to most of the arguments in this thread, he just keeps spouting the same shit over and over. People like this aren't worth having a rational discussion with.