DraQ
Arcane
That's some serious case of split personality.
That's some serious case of split personality.
That's some serious case of split personality.
Clearly it's the djinn posting on his behalf.
So anytime someone answers one of his GD posts he in fact can't see the answer?That's actually pretty close to true. Any recent posts you see by Andhaira in GD are ones a moderator has moved there from another forum. As far as I know he doesn't have access to GD or Politics at the moment.
Well Sheltem IS pretty well built.... does that count?Raise awareness by changing yourprofile pictureavatar to a picture of a Pakistani bodybuilder!
So anytime someone answers one of his GD posts he in fact can't see the answer?That's actually pretty close to true. Any recent posts you see by Andhaira in GD are ones a moderator has moved there from another forum. As far as I know he doesn't have access to GD or Politics at the moment.
This has much potential
Why the elitism? Why the insistence on not letting some people post? This is just petty forum behavior. This is no different from the mob calling Wizardry an evil troll on RPS, or any other such behavior. As if any of you were cut out of a different cloth. It is ridiculous. You are all hypocrites. None of you are choir boys, all of you are as irreverent, amoral and inflammatory. You only use some people you identify as vulnerable or different as pariahs to feel superior. This is what it's truly about. I can spot this behavior from a mile away, there's no use in pretending otherwise.
Don't pretend that what you're doing is anything else than wanting to reenact this exact behavior, but with the power dynamic now favoring you instead.
Why the elitism? Why the insistence on not letting some people post? This is just petty forum behavior. This is no different from the mob calling Wizardry an evil troll on RPS, or any other such behavior. As if any of you were cut out of a different cloth. It is ridiculous. You are all hypocrites. None of you are choir boys, all of you are as irreverent, amoral and inflammatory. You only use some people you identify as vulnerable or different as pariahs to feel superior. This is what it's truly about. I can spot this behavior from a mile away, there's no use in pretending otherwise.
Don't pretend that what you're doing is anything else than wanting to reenact this exact behavior, but with the power dynamic now favoring you instead.
What I read:Why the elitism? Why the insistence on not letting some people post? This is just petty forum behavior. This is no different from the mob calling Wizardry an evil troll on RPS, or any other such behavior. As if any of you were cut out of a different cloth. It is ridiculous. You are all hypocrites. None of you are choir boys, all of you are as irreverent, amoral and inflammatory. You only use some people you identify as vulnerable or different as pariahs to feel superior. This is what it's truly about. I can spot this behavior from a mile away, there's no use in pretending otherwise.
Don't pretend that what you're doing is anything else than wanting to reenact this exact behavior, but with the power dynamic now favoring you instead.
I am vulnerable and different.
I am vulnerable and different.
Horse tickets, bitch!
A morally acceptable duel would start with the challenger issuing a traditional, public, personal grievance, based on an insult, directly to the single person who offended the challenger.
The challenged person had the choice of a public apology or other restitution, or choosing the weapons for the duel. The challenger would then propose a place for the "field of honour". The challenged man had to either accept the site or propose an alternative.
How about CISfisting privilegesI want SISfisting privileges.
If sheek was a Gentleman, he'd know that as the person who issues the challenge, he does not get to choose the weapons of the duel.
The Code Duello clearly states:
A morally acceptable duel would start with the challenger issuing a traditional, public, personal grievance, based on an insult, directly to the single person who offended the challenger.
The challenged person had the choice of a public apology or other restitution, or choosing the weapons for the duel. The challenger would then propose a place for the "field of honour". The challenged man had to either accept the site or propose an alternative.
I'm certain that if he names his seconds, the administration would be willing to duel using ban buttons until one party is no longer able to post on the codex.
Fix'd.I am vulnerable and different.
D'aw.
Then pinata.
I still think my idea of a team death match on Warband is a good idea. The status quo cannot continue, the liberals are only getting stronger, we need to make a stand. If we win full amnesty for Andhaira, FretRider, Bryce and all other conservatives and mods stop harassing/promise to let us post in peace for a year.
http://www.rpgcodex.net/forums/index.php?threads/codex-warband.81340/
None of you are choir boys, all of you are as irreverent, amoral and inflammatory.