Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Incline My BROFisting Priviliges

LundB

Mistakes were made.
Joined
Jan 2, 2012
Messages
4,160
That's some serious case of split personality.
:lol:

Clearly it's the djinn posting on his behalf.

That's actually pretty close to true. Any recent posts you see by Andhaira in GD are ones a moderator has moved there from another forum. As far as I know he doesn't have access to GD or Politics at the moment. He isn't insane.
 

Jaesun

Fabulous Ex-Moderator
Patron
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
37,241
Location
Seattle, WA USA
MCA
They should have been retardoed. And every time he posts GD shit in the wrong forum, another year wait is added to his access to GD.

:M
 

LundB

Mistakes were made.
Joined
Jan 2, 2012
Messages
4,160
Free Andhaira 2013!

Raise awareness by changing your Facebook Codex profile picture avatar to a picture of a Pakistani bodybuilder!
 

Sceptic

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Mar 2, 2010
Messages
10,871
Divinity: Original Sin
That's actually pretty close to true. Any recent posts you see by Andhaira in GD are ones a moderator has moved there from another forum. As far as I know he doesn't have access to GD or Politics at the moment.
So anytime someone answers one of his GD posts he in fact can't see the answer?

This has much potential :smug:

Raise awareness by changing your Facebook Codex profile picture avatar to a picture of a Pakistani bodybuilder!
Well Sheltem IS pretty well built.... does that count?
 

DraQ

Arcane
Joined
Oct 24, 2007
Messages
32,828
Location
Chrząszczyżewoszyce, powiat Łękołody
That's actually pretty close to true. Any recent posts you see by Andhaira in GD are ones a moderator has moved there from another forum. As far as I know he doesn't have access to GD or Politics at the moment.
So anytime someone answers one of his GD posts he in fact can't see the answer?

This has much potential :smug:
:lol:

I forsee much trolling in the near future...
 
Repressed Homosexual
Joined
Mar 29, 2010
Messages
17,867
Location
Ottawa, Can.
Why the elitism? Why the insistence on not letting some people post? This is just petty forum behavior. This is no different from the mob calling Wizardry an evil troll on RPS, or any other such behavior. As if any of you were cut out of a different cloth. It is ridiculous. You are all hypocrites. None of you are choir boys, all of you are as irreverent, amoral and inflammatory. You only use some people you identify as vulnerable or different as pariahs to feel superior. This is what it's truly about. I can spot this behavior from a mile away, there's no use in pretending otherwise.

Don't pretend that what you're doing is anything else than wanting to reenact this exact behavior, but with the power dynamic now favoring you instead.
 

evdk

comrade troglodyte :M
Patron
Joined
Mar 31, 2004
Messages
11,292
Location
Corona regni Bohemiae
Codex 2012 Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
Trolling the Fretty topic does not work anymore, eh? Trying your hand at valiantly defending Andy now, I see. I am sure you can get two or even three pages out of it.
 

EG

Nullified
Joined
Oct 12, 2011
Messages
4,264
Why the elitism? Why the insistence on not letting some people post? This is just petty forum behavior. This is no different from the mob calling Wizardry an evil troll on RPS, or any other such behavior. As if any of you were cut out of a different cloth. It is ridiculous. You are all hypocrites. None of you are choir boys, all of you are as irreverent, amoral and inflammatory. You only use some people you identify as vulnerable or different as pariahs to feel superior. This is what it's truly about. I can spot this behavior from a mile away, there's no use in pretending otherwise.

Don't pretend that what you're doing is anything else than wanting to reenact this exact behavior, but with the power dynamic now favoring you instead.

Any action that you dislike, even when it does not affect you, is labeled oppressive and tyrannical. Can you never accept that some posters need to be disciplined and others need to cease being posters, if only for a time?
 

commie

The Last Marxist
Patron
Joined
May 12, 2010
Messages
1,865,249
Location
Where one can weep in peace
Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Divinity: Original Sin 2
Why the elitism? Why the insistence on not letting some people post? This is just petty forum behavior. This is no different from the mob calling Wizardry an evil troll on RPS, or any other such behavior. As if any of you were cut out of a different cloth. It is ridiculous. You are all hypocrites. None of you are choir boys, all of you are as irreverent, amoral and inflammatory. You only use some people you identify as vulnerable or different as pariahs to feel superior. This is what it's truly about. I can spot this behavior from a mile away, there's no use in pretending otherwise.

Don't pretend that what you're doing is anything else than wanting to reenact this exact behavior, but with the power dynamic now favoring you instead.

Ban HHR.


Oh and ban Glyphwright.
 

DarkUnderlord

Professional Throne Sitter
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2002
Messages
28,343
What Hhr wrote:

Why the elitism? Why the insistence on not letting some people post? This is just petty forum behavior. This is no different from the mob calling Wizardry an evil troll on RPS, or any other such behavior. As if any of you were cut out of a different cloth. It is ridiculous. You are all hypocrites. None of you are choir boys, all of you are as irreverent, amoral and inflammatory. You only use some people you identify as vulnerable or different as pariahs to feel superior. This is what it's truly about. I can spot this behavior from a mile away, there's no use in pretending otherwise.

Don't pretend that what you're doing is anything else than wanting to reenact this exact behavior, but with the power dynamic now favoring you instead.
What I read:

I am vulnerable and different.
:hmmm:
 
Self-Ejected

Ulminati

Kamelåså!
Patron
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
20,317
Location
DiNMRK
If sheek was a Gentleman, he'd know that as the person who issues the challenge, he does not get to choose the weapons of the duel.

The Code Duello clearly states:

A morally acceptable duel would start with the challenger issuing a traditional, public, personal grievance, based on an insult, directly to the single person who offended the challenger.
The challenged person had the choice of a public apology or other restitution, or choosing the weapons for the duel. The challenger would then propose a place for the "field of honour". The challenged man had to either accept the site or propose an alternative.

I'm certain that if he names his seconds, the administration would be willing to duel using ban buttons until one party is no longer able to post on the codex.
 

DraQ

Arcane
Joined
Oct 24, 2007
Messages
32,828
Location
Chrząszczyżewoszyce, powiat Łękołody
If sheek was a Gentleman, he'd know that as the person who issues the challenge, he does not get to choose the weapons of the duel.

The Code Duello clearly states:

A morally acceptable duel would start with the challenger issuing a traditional, public, personal grievance, based on an insult, directly to the single person who offended the challenger.
The challenged person had the choice of a public apology or other restitution, or choosing the weapons for the duel. The challenger would then propose a place for the "field of honour". The challenged man had to either accept the site or propose an alternative.

I'm certain that if he names his seconds, the administration would be willing to duel using ban buttons until one party is no longer able to post on the codex.
:salute:

Fix'd.
 

EG

Nullified
Joined
Oct 12, 2011
Messages
4,264

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom