Jim the Dinosaur
Arcane
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2009
- Messages
- 3,144
a future, that is, which is explicitly now
the problem, it occurred to me, with ratings is how they are overly subjective, thus giving rise to things such as the extensive agenda-driven brofist operations uncovered by Blaine through arduous pointing-out work.
what if I told you there was a way to have posts automatically rated via advanced proprietary algorithms, telling the reader immediately how he should judge its contents? you'd call me mad probably but you couldn't possibly be farther removed from the truth my friend.
my team's work is still in a systems alpha phase allowing only for either
or 
ratings, so be advised that the results might oversimplify the post you choose to subject to analysis.
simply add the post between the quotes in this script:
https://repl.it/Fw6X/1
the system works by carefully analyzing an OBJECTIVELY rated text (this for and this for ) and then comparing it to the post.
if you wish to test out different templates, you can add them in here
https://repl.it/Fw6X/2
the problem, it occurred to me, with ratings is how they are overly subjective, thus giving rise to things such as the extensive agenda-driven brofist operations uncovered by Blaine through arduous pointing-out work.
what if I told you there was a way to have posts automatically rated via advanced proprietary algorithms, telling the reader immediately how he should judge its contents? you'd call me mad probably but you couldn't possibly be farther removed from the truth my friend.
my team's work is still in a systems alpha phase allowing only for either
or ratings, so be advised that the results might oversimplify the post you choose to subject to analysis.simply add the post between the quotes in this script:
https://repl.it/Fw6X/1
the system works by carefully analyzing an OBJECTIVELY rated text (this for
and this for ) and then comparing it to the post.if you wish to test out different templates, you can add them in here
https://repl.it/Fw6X/2
