Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Playing on low(est) settings

sser

Arcane
Developer
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
1,866,687
Played Might & Magic X on the lowest setting with my laptop. Looked like TOTAL SHIT. Everything was varying shades of mud. That said, still had a lot of fun and dumped 50+ hours into, twice as much as the framerate I was getting...
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2014
Messages
410
Gothic 3 at release, unpatched. Completed two-thirds of Myrtana aiming my character's head at the ground all the while for that extra fps. Ah, good times, even if the textures failed to load quite often. Music played nice, though.
 

Carrion

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jun 30, 2011
Messages
3,648
Location
Lost in Necropolis
I remember playing Giants: Citizen Kabuto on a PC that went far above the recommended settings, and at the start the game ran fine and looked good. Towards the end of the game things got much worse, though (might have been a memory leak or something), and it became nearly unplayable with even passable-looking settings. I lowered the settings so that the game looked terrible, with buildings that looked like they were made from four polygons if you got more than ten feet away from them. It was especially jarring when some other parts of the game were much more detailed so that the shittiness stood out even more. The game was still funny as hell despite the fact that the endgame kind of sucked, but I doubt I would've got very far in it had it looked like that from the start.

GTA3 also ran like shit on that same computer, as its framerate was barely in the two digits. At least it was consistent enough that it was somewhat playable. Before that, Escape From Monkey Island was even worse without a proper GPU, but again playable because adventure game. Rogue Spear suffered from horrible framerate to a point where it became simply unplayable without autoaim or other such faggotry, but I still got halfway through it before giving up. I could list plenty of other games that ran like shit but which I still wanted to play, but those are the first ones that came to mind. Nowadays I probably wouldn't bother with such games, but at one point my endurance level was much higher.

I do think some games look a bit better on lower settings. Higher resolution sometimes makes things look too sharp, sterile and somewhat unnatural whereas a lower resolution gives a bit of warmth to it. This especially applies to many first-person games from around 2000. I also generally dislike high-res patches for isometric games. I'll join the motion blur / bloom / depth of field hate squad as well, save for some exceptions here and there (like Dark Souls that's really meant to be played with DoF enabled). Can't really think of an example where turning everything to low would make the game look better, though, and you'd probably need to have serious problems or a pretty horrible art direction for that to happen (like this becoming this when turning everything from low to high).
 

BLOBERT

FUCKING SLAYINGN IT BROS
Patron
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
4,245
Location
BRO
Codex 2012
BROS PRECURSORS ISD GIVING ME FITS AND STILL RUNS CRAPPY SOMETIMES ON LOWEST SETTING FOR ME
 

Gregz

Arcane
Joined
Jul 31, 2011
Messages
8,542
Location
The Desert Wasteland
And here I was, expecting a juicy tell-all confession from our prestigious members who use the lowest difficulty settings.

:negative:

seriously though, somebody should make that thread
 
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
1,876,057
Location
Glass Fields, Ruins of Old Iran
I tend to turn off antialiasing, bloom, shadows, depth of field and other such niceties when possible. The performance hit is not worth it for me unless it's an ancient game. Sometimes the game even looks better. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 

pippin

Guest
I also turn off cosmetic stuff and lower shadow quality when it feels it will hinder my pc's performance. my laptop is supposed to be weak, but the only game i've really struggled with in terms of graphics is the witcher 2.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2008
Messages
3,059
Location
Brazil
Divinity: Original Sin
I played Deus Ex with an onborad graphics card, the game lagged as hell, even with 8 bit textures. The solution for avoiding low FPS was playong constantly looking to the ground or to the sky. Can't remember my PC config from that time, but i believe it was an AMD K6-2 with ~300Mhz.
 

Shaewaroz

Arcane
Patron
Joined
May 4, 2013
Messages
2,923
Location
In a hobo shack due to betting on neanderthal
I'm very into cock and ball torture
My PC in the late 1990s ran everything like shit. FF7 lagged especially during cutscenes and the game even crashed during particularly intensive cinematics. BG2 also lagged especially during the dragon fights and for some reason in the Underdark.

Actually I think I grew more attached to these games because my 266Mhz MMX could just barely run them, it added a completely new difficulty to the gameplay experience - the shitty PC difficulty. I remember literally praying while playing FF7 that the game wouldn't freeze during a particular cutscene, and more often than not it did freeze and sometimes I had to copy the game save file on a flippy disk and take it to my friend - he would then play through the part with the intensive cutscene and bring the new save file to school in a floppy disk so that I could continue playing the game. As a result I really grew to appreciate being able to proceed in the game and felt heavily invested in the story. I wouldn't change my experiences playing with my shitty computer for anything.
 
Last edited:

kingcomrade

Kingcomrade
Edgy
Joined
Oct 16, 2005
Messages
26,884
Location
Cognitive Elite HQ
I recently got Crysis 3. That game looks fucking amazing. After the intro cutscene and playing part of the first level I had to admit I had like a 20 framerate and had to turn it down. I turned it down and it still somehow looked awesome.
I should upgrade my computer. I could certainly afford it but...all the new stuff like the new RAM type and the processor after Haswell comes out next year, so I have to wait.
 

Turrul

Augur
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
212
I played Mount&Blade on the lowest settings possible (DX7!)back then, for smooth fps and full battle size.
 

DwarvenFood

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Jan 5, 2009
Messages
6,408
Location
Atlantic Accelerator
Strap Yourselves In Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Wasteland 2 Codex USB, 2014 Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire
I mostly play on laptops, so it's kind of mandatory to play on lower settings while playing 3D games. I can easily play stuff like Shadowrun in full mode, but Original Sin has serious issues and Wasteland 2 I don't even want to try before getting better hardware.

I do agree that lower resolution has preference over lower settings, and overall I do always turn off anti alias and motion blur because of aesthetic preference.
 

DraQ

Arcane
Joined
Oct 24, 2007
Messages
32,828
Location
Chrząszczyżewoszyce, powiat Łękołody
I don't turn AA off for aesthetic reasons but there was the time it was always the first casualty of low framerate.
Reason? It nommed a lot of processing power for near-negligible effect.
Yeah, I know, jaggies.
Didn't move me in 90s, no reason it should suddenly start to.
 

Dr Skeleton

Arcane
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
817
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
I remember playing Sacrifice on a PC that just barely met the minimum requirements. Had very long loading times, weird draw distance and terrain disappearing sometime, but the game run smooth even with a lot of units and effects on screen.

More recently, when I first played New Vegas it was on a shitty laptop on low/medium settings with shadows and water effects disabled. A few areas (the NCR airport base in particular) run choppy, but it was playable. I got used to it, so when I played it on ultra with graphics mods it did look kinda wrong, the only significant improvement was lightning and darker nights mods, the difference between vanilla low/medium and ultra is not that big, it's just an ugly game.
 

Wintermute

Augur
Patron
Joined
Jul 29, 2008
Messages
294
Location
Cyberspace
A Beautifully Desolate Campaign
Civ4 - huge maps - on a below specs PC. Perfect for catching up on your reading in between turns.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom