OP has a point, and this has been noted before. Let us not even get into the Curator PoE review episode.
What I have been seeing here is a conflict of interest, and an attempt to make the Codex into something it never was, and by attempting to do so will risk destroying it, or at least destroying what made it into the Codex in the first place.
The primary attraction of the Codex has always been the honest and brutal dissemination of AAA games.
Morrowind.
RPG Codex Game of the Year, 2002:
Many have lauded this game's accomplishments, and deservedly so.
[...]
Morrowind is without a doubt one of the most amazing accomplishments of the year.
[...]
Morrowind is a game that, for me, both promised and delivered.
[...]
Morrowind comes complete with stunning graphics, but past that is an immersive world, full of things to do. So full in fact, that I am still playing, as no doubt are many others.
Man, we sure ripped Morrowind a new one back in the day.
Bru-tal.
Hell, you might even say we're
promoting it what with all that attention and all. Just look at
all this shilling for Lionheart.
None of these people came because of the Twitter or the Curator group or whatever. They came because they want to be in a place where they can openly rip apart games without fear of being banned. And sure the occasional lulz in GD.
But you cannot have both these things together; if you are attempting to put certain game companies & devs in a positive light for whatever reason (not indicating anything sinister here, it could be you just like their games) at a certain point in the future many aspects of the site will have to be toned down, including honest opinions and reviews of games, especially as these small time devs start getting bigger, which IMO is the direction Fargo & Co. are headed with Fig.
We've been "promoting" certain developers for years via news posts on the front page. BioWare, Obsidian and so on. We've always heavily posted in favour of one developer or game over others.
It's called news. A game joins the FIG platform? Well hey, that's news. Except these days, we don't just front page it, we can tweet it too. We used to literally post about every new RPG launched on KickStarter until there just became too many of them. Now we pick and choose based on what seems the most interesting.
And if you're worried about shilling, you should be worried about us raising tens of thousands of dollars for games now too. That I note, are only a select few games that we choose to - dare I say -
promote too. We don't run a fundraiser for every game.
I think at this point a compromise might be the best idea: Crooked Bee &/or Infinitron can make a Twitter under their own handles and can even title themselves RPGCodex Editor & RPGCodex News Poster/Investigative Journalist; they can then post whatever they want from that. That way the Twitter account does not give the impression the majority of the userbase supports everything tweeted from it, because they don't and I think the views of the userbase should be taken into account.
No, the problem is the people who think a Tweet and Steam Curator add mean anything. Then there are those confused by the notion that there is some kind of "Codex Hivemind" which agrees with everything. Hell, even after all of the complaints about PoE being added to the Steam Curator list...
The vast majority of people still want it added to the Steam Curator list (56% of all votes if you exclude KingComrade).
The problem is people who think "The Codex" is actually capable of standing for anything at all. Hell, even the notion of an article of the 72 best RPGs of all time is against the Codex' nature. Now 72 people debating about which RPG is their favourite maybe...
Our only intention is to discuss CRPGs. We do that by posting news which allows people to discuss those things. We now do that on Twitter and Facebook. And as always, we can't cover everything, so we only post about the stuff that interests those with posting privileges. For everything else, I'm sure we've got a Sub-Forum for it now.
The strength of the Codex isn't that we post news it seems people in this thread don't like, or add games that you can't decide whether you like them or not but a majority of you think it should be added... it's that we allow you to discuss it.