Crispy™ Ratings BreakDown

[oldmanpaco]

So I want to know know I got my ratings. When we hover over the score (xxx/xxx/xxx) it should tell us where those points came from.

And where are the new KKK awards?

Its like no one thought things through before jumping to the Button Parade.

 

[oldmanpaco]

See Ninjerk I want to see that butthurt listed in the ratings. What is so wrong with that? I currently have a 155 red rating - how much if that is butthurt?

edit: And how much of that red is from you Ninjerk? It appears I have 9500 posts to evaluate.

 

[Ninjerk]

I wanted to make sure you knew where at least one came from.

 

[GandGolf]

And your wish has been granted! Though as I stated in DarkUnderlord's profile almost all of the post ratings are classified as negative except for 3. Hopefully that will get fixed.

 

[Lady_Error]

Though as I stated in DarkUnderlord's profile almost all of the post ratings are classified as negative except for 3. Hopefully that will get fixed.

It's not a bug, it's a feature.

 

[Ninja Destroyer]

Now we can see who is the biggest giver on the Codex.

Commissar Draco has given 124,366 brofist. He fisted an entire city!

anus_pounder has given "only" 46,446 brofist ?!?!


The Russian hackers strike again!



:russia:

 

[The Brazilian Slaughter]

I have given over 90k brofists

holy shit

 

[J_C]

Rating breakdown: everything is shit.

 

[Glop_dweller]

I was indeed curious as to why Brofists, Salutes, Thanks, and ~Agreements(?) all counted as negative ratings.

Spoiler

 

[Kev Inkline]

My opinion on how it should work:

---
The problem is that thanks to the Trumpfists, we have more positive than negative ratings.

Disagree and Agree are neutral. "I respectfully disagree" is super negative.

Also, old is neutral (((agenda))).

Shittydog is hard to place.

Racist is negative, but we would need a counterpart - SJW (or is cuck already that?). Both negative.

 

[Irenaeus]

Agenda should be negative, dog is neutral, racist is positive.

 

[Kev Inkline]

Agenda should be negative, dog is neutral, racist is positive.

And he just rated me with agenda...

 

[Lady_Error]

Agenda is neutral-negative, like Roxor's reviews.

 

[DarkUnderlord]

Everything that's negative is meant to be negative. Everything that's positive is meant to be positive and everything that's neutral is never meant to be used except by the chosen privileged few.

 

[Severian Silk]

You should use the D&D alignment system for the ratings.

 

[Kev Inkline]

Everything that's negative is meant to be negative. Everything that's positive is meant to be positive and everything that's neutral is never meant to be used except by the chosen privileged few.

Yes yes, but how about some more Sir TIm?

You know it's meant to be a dev mug.

 

[Zed Duke of Banville]

You should use the D&D alignment system for the ratings.

G
​

L

____

____

C

E​

Alternatively,

LG

________CG

LE

________

CE

 

[PulsatingBrain]

I just want to know what the fucking bird means

 

[Severian Silk]

I just want to know what the fucking bird means

It's the emoticon equivalent of an ellipsis.

 

[Kev Inkline]

I just want to know what the fucking bird means

If you have to ask, you already know.

 

[PulsatingBrain]

I think I kind of get it now, thanks guys

 

[Glop_dweller]

The problem with negative ratings is that the giver can call anything crap with no indication that the post was even understood by them in the least; unlike with agreements, where it's implied that the giver agrees [and presumably understood the post to some extent]. They can be serious or malicious. It's a good thing the site tracks all ratings given, so at least one can see if a poster just makes a habit of doling out insult ratings.

 

[Zed Duke of Banville]

9-alignment version

NG

LG

_________ CG​

LN

_______

________

CN

LE

________

CE

NE​

 

[Irenaeus]

Why is the dog evil? Do I have to play some shitty game hated on the Codex to find out?

 

[WhiteGuts]

Are people in this thread trying to balance the rating system ?