Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Codex Review RPG Codex Review: Shadow Tactics: Blades of the Shogun

epeli

Arcane
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
719
Hmm... Maybe I should write Underrail review.

Go for it! No, seriously, you're probably the best person to review Codex GOTY since Roxor doesn't care about the butthurt potential. I'm afraid the administration won't let you include any "BUY AOD !!!1" banner ads in it, but remember to mention AoD at least once per paragraph so we know it's not ghostwritten.

But on to slightly more serious matters outside codex and https://www.rpgcodex.net/forums/index.php?threads/goral-one-broken-man

Finding out about your spergy crusade against Underrail was the best laugh I had all week, thanks for that. I sincerely hope you understand that you are doing no good for your beloved game either... but I digress. Respond to the thread and own up to your actions like a decent human being. Don't sweat it, we have no intentions of banning you from the Steam community hub. (Valve might, but that is outside our control.) Just don't annoy other users too much with your advertising and shitposting. Cheers.
 
Self-Ejected

Ludo Lense

Self-Ejected
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
936
I didn't want to reply to this so the drama would end quickly but I realize I made a mistake given some people's reaction and e-mails the next day.

Allow me to add the following:

I am not leaving the RPG Codex, I have not asked to be ejected or anything of the sort. I will still be on the forums as per usual.
 

Goral

Arcane
Patron
The Real Fanboy
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
3,552
Location
Poland
I didn't want to reply to this so the drama would end quickly but I realize I made a mistake given some people's reaction and e-mails the next day.
You didn't deny it was because of CB and Tron. So it's confirmed.
interesting.png
 

Bumvelcrow

Somewhat interesting
Patron
Dumbfuck
Joined
Nov 17, 2012
Messages
1,867,060
Location
Over the hills and far away
Codex 2013 Codex 2014 Make the Codex Great Again! Strap Yourselves In
I didn't want to reply to this so the drama would end quickly but I realize I made a mistake given some people's reaction and e-mails the next day.

Allow me to add the following:

I am not leaving the RPG Codex, I have not asked to be ejected or anything of the sort. I will still be on the forums as per usual.

So what are your objections to the final form of the review? It seemed pretty good to me? Is it just the choice of words that's the problem or do you feel that the tone of the review and your opinion of the game has been Infinitron'd changed?
 

Lostpleb

Learned
Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Messages
380
Getting some good Commandos: Beyond the Call of Duty vibes from this game, and it was nice to read about the differences between the Japanese and English dubs. If the material does not actually come from Japan, then I'd rather go for the cringier option and get a few lols out of it. :P
 

agris

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Apr 16, 2004
Messages
6,764
298 removals
315 additions


I didn't read the changes, but that's quite a lot. If he didn't agree to it, his reaction is understandable.
Also, is this what we've come to? People leaving the forum and disowning their own content because of the staff's interference?
That looks like regular copy editing.

:0/5: / did not deliver drama.
 

Zombra

An iron rock in the river of blood and evil
Patron
Joined
Jan 12, 2004
Messages
11,539
Location
Black Goat Woods !@#*%&^
Make the Codex Great Again! RPG Wokedex Strap Yourselves In Codex Year of the Donut Codex+ Now Streaming! Serpent in the Staglands Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
By the way, Ludo never said he wanted his name taken off because they edited his grammar. I'm inclined to think this has nothing to do with the edits at all. There is a deeper drama here, I just know it.
 

SausageInYourFace

Angelic Reinforcement
Patron
Joined
Dec 28, 2013
Messages
3,858
Location
In your face
Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech Bubbles In Memoria A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag. My team has the sexiest and deadliest waifus you can recruit. Pathfinder: Wrath

Infinitron

I post news
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
97,236
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
By the way, Ludo never said he wanted his name taken off because they edited his grammar. I'm inclined to think this has nothing to do with the edits at all. There is a deeper drama here, I just know it.

It's about the edits, and I suppose, the way we handle edits. For both this review and the Hard West review a year ago.

Tough cookies, the way the Codex works isn't for everybody. Like DU says, we're not professionals here.
 

Tigranes

Arcane
Joined
Jan 8, 2009
Messages
10,350
The edits look like typical copy-editing, and having hundreds of changes is routine (add a period? One change!). It is also common courtesy for any edits to be returned to author for approval.

Who knows what Ludo Lense is actually pissed about, and who knows what Infinitron even means by "the way the Codex works".
 

Zdzisiu

Arcane
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
3,489
The edits look like typical copy-editing, and having hundreds of changes is routine (add a period? One change!). It is also common courtesy for any edits to be returned to author for approval.

Who knows what Ludo Lense is actually pissed about, and who knows what Infinitron even means by "the way the Codex works".
It might be the blood and semen sample they require all of the published authors to deliver.
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
35,656
The edits look like typical copy-editing, and having hundreds of changes is routine (add a period? One change!). It is also common courtesy for any edits to be returned to author for approval.

Who knows what Ludo Lense is actually pissed about, and who knows what Infinitron even means by "the way the Codex works".

The way the Codex works is "We have no desire to waste time with pedantic arguments over copy-editing, once you submit it, it's ours."
 

Fairfax

Arcane
Joined
Jun 17, 2015
Messages
3,518
The edits look like typical copy-editing, and having hundreds of changes is routine (add a period? One change!). It is also common courtesy for any edits to be returned to author for approval.

Who knows what Ludo Lense is actually pissed about, and who knows what Infinitron even means by "the way the Codex works".

The way the Codex works is "We have no desire to waste time with pedantic arguments over copy-editing, once you submit it, it's ours."
Sure, but if no agreement is reached, the author should be able to call it off before it's posted.
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
35,656
Sure, but if no agreement is reached, the author should be able to call it off before it's posted.

The Codex does not scale to the level of prima donnas. So far only one person has had their ego bruised over this process.
 

Fairfax

Arcane
Joined
Jun 17, 2015
Messages
3,518
The Codex does not scale to the level of prima donnas.
:hmmm:

DarkUnderlord, please eject me. I'm done with this site.

I put in that sentence because after due consideration I thought it would be unfair to VD to not acknowledge that he had, in fact, attempted massively branching narrative, in a similar world no less. If you Bubbles think that's a controversial statement, or something that requires deeper knowledge than having followed the development of AoD here and the many threads about it, then go fuck yourself with a chainsaw.

Edit: Also Bubbles you pencildick, why didn't you ask me directly about it in the thread you were participating on? Do you have to hide behind Infinitron or the rest of the Codex staff for that?

Prime Junta said:
Lambchop19 To make it perfectly clear, no, I don't consider myself a Codexian.

There are a number of people here I respect, and some of the conversations are really good, but the vast majority of you and what goes on here... no, I don't want to identify with that.

PrimeJunta: oh just fuck the whole codex
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
35,656

Not banning him trolls him harder than banning him.

The idea I'm trying to get across is, if an editor is going to spend several hours of their time copyediting someone's work, no they're not going to let all that effort go to nothing because the writer throws a fit over how their grammar was corrected. The hilarious thing here is that Ludo Lense knew what the score was after his Hard West review and got mad about it again anyway.
 

Infinitron

I post news
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
97,236
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
Since this is a volunteer-based website, it's inevitable that contributors will have disparate levels of English writing skill. It's not something that's easy to discuss without offending people, but by subjecting some reviews to a mandatory editing pass we've been able to narrow the gap between them. That's worked well so far - so long as the contributors came at it from the mindset of wanting to pass on their knowledge about a game, and not as some sort of creative prose writing assignment where they're being graded for style.
 

Prime Junta

Guest
Let's talk about editorial process. 'Cuz there is a pretty well-established convention about what it is, and isn't. It goes like this:
  1. Editor and writer agree about what the writer is going to write. This can be as simple as "subject, length, deadline" or something a lot more complex, including an abstract, research plan, outline, or whatever else is deemed necessary. Sometimes the editor asks the writer, sometimes the writer pitches the idea to the editor. If any compensation is involved, that's negotiated at this point as well.
  2. Writer writes and submits the story.
  3. Editor will either accept it for publication, request revisions, or reject it.
    1. If it's accepted for publication, it goes into copy-editing.
    2. The request for revisions can be quite general ("the second half of the article doesn't make sense, cut it or rewrite it") or very specific (specific cuts, comments, or reformulations directly in the text). At this point, the writer can withdraw the article, or the editor and writer can proceed to revise it until both are satisfied they can go forward with publication. If the writer withdraws the story, the process ends.
    3. If the editor rejects the story, the process ends.
  4. The editor copy-edits the article. At this point, no substantive changes are made, but headlines, subheads, blurbs, and captions can be added, typos and grammar errors are corrected, and stylistic edits are made. Many publications have a style guide, and the copyeditors are the ones who enforce it. Sometimes as a courtesy the editors ask the writer to sign off on the final version; in most publications with deadlines this isn't done however simply because there's usually no time for it.
  5. The editor publishes the article.
There are some very strong assumptions about how the process proceeds. Specifically:
  1. Prior to step 5 (publication), the process is confidential: it's between the editor(s) and the writer(s). Works in progress are not shown to other parties without everybody's consent. If a story is rejected or withdrawn, nobody will know unless both parties agree about it.
  2. The editor(s) only publish the story if they're willing to stand behind it. This is in fact codified into law in most countries: the editor in chief of a publication is legally responsible for whatever is published on it. You simply can't publish something and then say "oh it's just the writer's opinion, we the editors think it's shit."
  3. The content of the story is nailed down and agreed upon during the revisions phase. After that point, the editor may not make substantive changes, and the writer may not withdraw the article.
So: if the Codex has made substantive changes to Ludo's article after accepting it for publication, then that's a gross violation of editorial process and Ludo has every right to be butthurt about it. However, if the Codex's changes amount to copyediting -- even if extensive, as can happen if the writer isn't writing in their native language -- then he's being a dumbfuck about it.

Finally: in my painful experience, this is roughly the process that even the Codex attempts to follow. There have been violations, but these haven't been consequence-free for the violators.

Source: personal experience. I've co-authored a book, been a regular contributor for a couple of magazines, and been co-editor-in-chief for a fairly ambitious volunteer-run periodical, plus done a bunch of other writing for publication – both for money and out of love for the art – here and there as well. Never been my main line of work, but still.

Edit: I diffed the versions and IMO the Codex edits are straight-up copyediting, not substantive (and the article reads a good deal better after them). If there's something specific Ludo is butthurt about, I'd be curious to hear what it is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
3,144
The edits look like typical copy-editing, and having hundreds of changes is routine (add a period? One change!). It is also common courtesy for any edits to be returned to author for approval.

Who knows what Ludo Lense is actually pissed about, and who knows what Infinitron even means by "the way the Codex works".

The way the Codex works is "We have no desire to waste time with pedantic arguments over copy-editing, once you submit it, it's ours."
Sure, but if no agreement is reached, the author should be able to call it off before it's posted.

It's not clear tho that Lense wanted to call it off. If he did this with earlier reviews he might just want to "Alan Smithee" it, being willing to contribute content to the codex but not wanting to be associated with it for whatever reason.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom