Positive:
Neutral:
Negative:
If I were to reshuffle them I'd put some of those in different places. Here's my suggestion:
Positive:
Neutral:
Negative:
what I changed:
as neutral, because it's just
as positive, because it's a kind of "like" button, you agree with the
user's agenda post and support its statement (but
should remain neutral as disagreeing might not mean "dumb retard post" but also many other things, a different point of view is not necessarily an inferior one, albeit it might.
as neutral, because the agenda can be positive, neutral or negative, however it's usually neutral as in case of liking or disliking one's agenda we already have brofists, shits etc
as neutral as it's not limited to just gassing jews and slavs, but it basically includes all kinds of racism and "racism" such as dislike of the current trend of muslimization of europe. just look at politics subforum how it's used. not always in a negative way, very often in a neutral way.
as neutral. srsly of all places i'd expect codex to count it as positive, not a negative. Old might mean both out of date and classy, hence it should be considered neutral.
as neutral. I've never seen it used as a negative, I think. It just shows that one agrees with the post's negative viewpoint or considers something that the post mentions as a negative trend or event.