Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Why isn't RPGCodex on Meta Critic?

Duellist_D

Duellist_D

Savant
Patron
Joined
Dec 15, 2013
Messages
383
Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 BattleTech
taxalot said:
Also, Obsidian could be blaming us for a metacritic score too low and say they have to fire people thanks to those assholes at RPGCodex we used to like.
Click to expand...

And this would be bad in what way?
 
Hegel

Hegel

Arcane
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
3,274
Sure, great idea. I'm really looking forward to Infinitron 2.0, now with an improved and non-detectable shilling subroutine.
 
Baron Dupek

Baron Dupek

Arcane
Joined
Jul 23, 2013
Messages
1,870,841
Sjukob said:
Codex becoming mainstream will lead it to the downfall .
Click to expand...
Seeing how Fallout4 is popular among codexers (especially oldfags) - it's already on the bottom.

[codex]Codex userbase and administration would be unable to handle the amount of retards that will come with popularity increase .[/QUOTE]
And cut off the large amount of potential drama(s)? I think not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom