Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Recent content by Life of the Party

  1. Life of the Party

    Hearts of Iron IV - The Ultimate WWII Strategy Game

    Sure, imbalance and bugs, but my main issue is this seemingly way too popular notion that civil wars in a HoI game, particularly those involving as many sides as possible, are something good and desirable and that we want as many of them as possible. It's messy by design, not by mistake.
  2. Life of the Party

    Grand Strategy Crusader Kings III

    Just wait a year, guys.
  3. Life of the Party

    Hearts of Iron IV - The Ultimate WWII Strategy Game

    Tried Thousand Week Reich. It's pretty messy. Everyone and their mother implodes into a ten-sided civil war (particularly once Hitler dies) and I got hundreds declaration of war notifications while playing barely a year or two. I also can't say I appreciated losing a war as one of those...
  4. Life of the Party

    Hearts of Iron IV - The Ultimate WWII Strategy Game

    A description I came across is 'neon colours with a muted colour scheme'. And yeah, like some others, I find it a complete eyesore. Just a bit of trolling, if I'm not mistaken.

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom