Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Development Info The Age of Decadence Screenshots

VentilatorOfDoom

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2009
Messages
8,600
Location
Deutschland
Tags: Age of Decadence; Iron Tower

<p>The new Iron Tower facebook page features a set of new screenshots. <a href="http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=34396&amp;id=174961962546309&amp;ref=mf" target="_blank">Have a look</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
 

Gromnir

Liturgist
Joined
Jan 11, 2004
Messages
394
so, for what year did sherman set the wayback machine? who says time travel is impossible? looking at the screenies, Gromnir thought he were back in 2003... or maybe 2002.

HA! Good Fun!
 

Jora

Arcane
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Messages
1,115
Location
Finland
Gromnir said:
so, for what year did sherman set the wayback machine? who says time travel is impossible? looking at the screenies, Gromnir thought he were back in 2003... or maybe 2002.
And? The games of 2003 looked perfectly adequate. Also, 2002 never looked as good as this. Look at some of the Dungeon Siege screens or videos. Those graphics are way below AoD's.
 

Serious_Business

Best Poster on the Codex
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Messages
3,909
Location
Frown Town
Gromnir said:
so, for what year did sherman set the wayback machine? who says time travel is impossible? looking at the screenies, Gromnir thought he were back in 2003... or maybe 2002.

HA! Good Fun!

:yeah:

YEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH GOOOOOOODDDDDD FUNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN BABY HELL YEAH GAHAHAHAHHA
 

Gromnir

Liturgist
Joined
Jan 11, 2004
Messages
394
Jora said:
Gromnir said:
so, for what year did sherman set the wayback machine? who says time travel is impossible? looking at the screenies, Gromnir thought he were back in 2003... or maybe 2002.
And? The games of 2003 looked perfectly adequate. Also, 2002 never looked as good as this. Look at some of the Dungeon Siege screens or videos. Those graphics are way below AoD's.

*chuckle*

fine. am willing, for the sake o' argument, to stipulate that aod is 8 years behind the curve as opposed to 9 years. happy?

HA! Good Fun!
 

Gromnir

Liturgist
Joined
Jan 11, 2004
Messages
394
Melcar said:
So when is it bad fun?

"never" is the answer we would like to be able to give. nevertheless, the fun kinda ends when some misogynist or racist yutz manages to derail a thread. is some other examples... but not too many. after all, Gromnir is a relative cheerful guy.

HA! Good Fun!
 

LittleJoe

Arbiter
Joined
Aug 26, 2005
Messages
1,780
Gromnir said:
Melcar said:
So when is it bad fun?

"never" is the answer we would like to be able to give. nevertheless, the fun kinda ends when some misogynist or racist yutz manages to derail a thread. is some other examples... but not too many. after all, Gromnir is a relative cheerful guy.

HA! Good Fun!

Why did you trust that bitch Gromnir?



As for Aod, it's gonna be friday at this rate.
 

Jora

Arcane
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Messages
1,115
Location
Finland
Gromnir said:
fine. am willing, for the sake o' argument, to stipulate that aod is 8 years behind the curve as opposed to 9 years. happy?
Yeah. If you look at, say, Neverwinter Nights and Silent Storm (from 2002 and 2003 respectively), SS looks much better. There's a big difference. And even though modern games look technically better, their art styles are way over the top. I actually prefer a style that's similar to the games from the beginning of the millenium.
 

Gromnir

Liturgist
Joined
Jan 11, 2004
Messages
394
LittleJoe said:
Gromnir said:
Melcar said:
So when is it bad fun?

"never" is the answer we would like to be able to give. nevertheless, the fun kinda ends when some misogynist or racist yutz manages to derail a thread. is some other examples... but not too many. after all, Gromnir is a relative cheerful guy.

HA! Good Fun!

Why did you trust that bitch Gromnir?

when the biowarians informed us that they would be including Gromnir in bg2 (not tob) they did not ask for our input. we expected that our namesake would be quickly and ignominiously dispatched by a kobold or xvart... or that we would be a kobold or xvart. so, you should probable ask the biowarians who did the writing, and not Gromnir who only provided the inspiration.

HA! Good Fun!
 

Vault Dweller

Commissar, Red Star Studio
Developer
Joined
Jan 7, 2003
Messages
28,024
Gromnir said:
Jora said:
Gromnir said:
so, for what year did sherman set the wayback machine? who says time travel is impossible? looking at the screenies, Gromnir thought he were back in 2003... or maybe 2002.
And? The games of 2003 looked perfectly adequate. Also, 2002 never looked as good as this. Look at some of the Dungeon Siege screens or videos. Those graphics are way below AoD's.

*chuckle*

fine. am willing, for the sake o' argument, to stipulate that aod is 8 years behind the curve as opposed to 9 years.
An indie game that doesn't have the latest graphics? How is that even possible?
 

Gromnir

Liturgist
Joined
Jan 11, 2004
Messages
394
Vault Dweller said:
Gromnir said:
Jora said:
Gromnir said:
so, for what year did sherman set the wayback machine? who says time travel is impossible? looking at the screenies, Gromnir thought he were back in 2003... or maybe 2002.
And? The games of 2003 looked perfectly adequate. Also, 2002 never looked as good as this. Look at some of the Dungeon Siege screens or videos. Those graphics are way below AoD's.

*chuckle*

fine. am willing, for the sake o' argument, to stipulate that aod is 8 years behind the curve as opposed to 9 years.
An indie game that doesn't have the latest graphics? How is that even possible?

you got a flair for understatement... we will give you that.

HA! Good Fun!
 

quasimodo

Augur
Joined
Oct 11, 2006
Messages
372
Gromnir said:
so, for what year did sherman set the wayback machine? who says time travel is impossible? looking at the screenies, Gromnir thought he were back in 2003... or maybe 2002.

HA! Good Fun!


When Thursday finally arrives and this game is released would the 8 or 9 year old graphics render the game unplayable to you?
 

Gromnir

Liturgist
Joined
Jan 11, 2004
Messages
394
quasimodo said:
Gromnir said:
so, for what year did sherman set the wayback machine? who says time travel is impossible? looking at the screenies, Gromnir thought he were back in 2003... or maybe 2002.

HA! Good Fun!


When Thursday finally arrives and this game is released would the 8 or 9 year old graphics render the game unplayable to you?

no.

'course this is a thread that identifies recently released screen shots from the game. given the fact that we don't see much gameplay in the screenies, what else is there to comment 'bout other than graphics quality?

also, when this game gets released if it gots a price tag similar to aaa games, then we expect it to be judged 'gainst the same standard: no free-pass 'cause of indie status. can engaging gameplay and compelling story elements make up for the lack o' production values seen in aaa games? sure, but if the take-no-prisoners codex crowd does the Three Wise Monkeys routine, we is gonna be dissapointed... albeit not surprised.

HA! Good Fun!
 

denizsi

Arcane
Joined
Nov 24, 2005
Messages
9,927
Location
bosphorus
Up to... 68 people?

The only thing I don't like about AoD's graphics is that the characters blend into the environment. They don't stand out.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom