Licaon_Kter
Augur
ummm John Mamais is the new Tomasz Gop ?
-
Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.
"This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
Game News The Witcher 2 gets awards; 2.0 coming
- Thread starter Elwro
- Start date
Shannow
Waster of Time
http://www.rpgcodex.net/phpBB/viewtopic ... sc&start=0corvus said:
http://www.rpgcodex.net/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=27694
http://www.rpgcodex.net/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=34535
http://rpgcodex.net/phpBB/viewtopic.php ... sc&start=0
Some codex history for you. Though I don't think I found any of the real drama threads. If you're interested you can search a bit yourself.
corvus
Arcane
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2011
- Messages
- 5,513
Seems like the bitching in those threads is all about the semantics of each re-re-release of the game. It's pretty irrational considering they were all free for the original owners of the game. Something like Star Wars getting "updated" every decade I can understand getting pissy over, since they're obviously not gonna let you enjoy the ultra definitive version for free. But this... What, were people angry that they were going to have to replay the game to experience it in its full glory? I'm just glad I only got the game after the director's cut came out, so I could see the titties as the devs originally envisioned.
Whatever, dumbfuck newfag and all that.
Bitching about free DLC and enhancements...only on the Codex.
Gerrard
Arcane
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
- Messages
- 12,040
Not only on Codex, there's bitching on gram and the official forum, mostly about how this is being marketed. And I agree with it, because we've come to a point where a developer releasing patches (not to mention free content) for his game is a goddamn phenomenon.
Licaon_Kter
Augur
yeah, 'cause not releasing any more patches is waaaaayyyy cooler that using the patches as marketing hooks 
DraQ
Arcane
I don't bitch about super duper triply enhanced diamond studded gold engraved platinum editions, because this shit doesn't affect me in any way. It's patch plus minor amount of free content - both of which are good things. It doesn't interfere with my ability to play and enjoy the game, it doesn't try to ram DRM up my ass, it doesn't try to make me pay money for a bucket of turds. If this gig helps CDPR sell more units of an admittedly good game (and selling it twice to impressionable retards or people with cash burning holes in their pocket and desperate need to make someone happier) or whatever, then I'm all for it:
and good luck.
and good luck.
However, the game has glaring issues. Sketchy chapter 3 being the most prominent. They should adress these, before making retarded dark arenas.
DraQ
Arcane
I have barely configured the game to not fry my laptop (still looks good, BTW, despite minimum settings apart from textures) and started the game, so I'm basing the "good" part on Codexian reception.
Looks good, so far, though.
Looks good, so far, though.
DraQ
Arcane
What.a budda said:
Unless you're a German yourself, then yes, as evidenced by the quote above.
As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.