"Sexism" seems to be about as incorrectly used these days as "RPG".
When I look up the definition of "sexism", I see this:
1: prejudice or discrimination based on sex; especially :discrimination against women
2: behavior, conditions, or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles based on sex
In 4 of the 5 games on that list, the women are the main damn characters (which kind of blows the first definition) and they are also badass warriors (which kind of blows the second).
Now, I can see how you could claim that the games promote unrealistic ideas of beauty, but that's far from the same thing as sexism.
It’s beyond stupid really. xD
For most “normal people”, if they can make something of the word it is usually the
classic definition of discrimination and prejudice leading to real-world disadvantages (for instance not getting a job because of it or getting less money for the same performance) and being allowed the same judicial and political powers as any other human being.
The portrayal of virtual characters in a story isn’t comprised in that definition and they can’t really be “discriminated” against since they are in the truest sense of the word
objects and not real persons.
In fact being able to put such characters into positions and situations one wouldn’t put real persons or they wouldn’t want to be in and creating fantasies is often the point in the first place.
As far as I can tell, according to their “logic” they arrive to that conclusion by jumping through various hoops of mental gymnastics even based on their own “social studies” and theories by first applying their theory of
sexual objectification which isn’t uncontroversial even amongst their circles
Sexual objectification is the act of treating a person merely as an instrument of sexual pleasure, making them a "sex object". Objectification more broadly means treating a person as a commodity or an object, without regard to their personality or dignity. Objectification is most commonly examined at the level of a society, but can also refer to the behavior of individuals.
The concept of sexual objectification and, in particular, the objectification of women, is an important idea in feminist theory and psychological theories derived from feminism. Many feminists regard sexual objectification as objectionable and as playing an important role in gender inequality. Some social commentators, however, argue that some modern women objectify themselves as an expression of their empowerment over men, while others argue that increased sexual freedom for women, gay, and bisexual men has led to an increase of the objectification of men. The idea of sexual objectification has also been an important area of discussion and debate in the area of sexual ethics and the philosophy of sex.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_objectification#Views_on_sexual_objectification
Then they jump through another logical hoop and apply this theory to virtual and non-existent characters claiming that they wouldn’t be able to give consent or know what they are doing (like models, actors or strippers) and depiction in any way that would be undignified for a person is bad and a hostile act by its designer (especially if male), basically trying to grant them basic human rights, arguing that this would lead to “sexism in society”.
Unfortunately the games media is full of radical leftards and worse that would jump at and embrace said rhetoric with open arms.
At that stage they seem to get caught in a resounding cacophonic loop of trying to beat each other in how indignant they are about the latest apparent slight by writing something down on their Blogs and “gaming journalism” being as it is often official magazines. The fact that it always seems to lead to a lot of hits from either camp isn’t bad either.
There are some articles about the phenomenon one of their own has dubbed “purity leftism”, which can only survive in environments like “social studies” courses in big cultural centers or specialty blogs with heavy moderation and self-reinforcing viewpoints and factors explained rather well here:
http://mattbruenig.com/2012/05/10/purity-leftism/
Although it seems to be backfiring, since they start attacking even the type of games that are trying to humor them:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/14/a...e-the-last-of-us-survival-favors-the-man.html
http://www.gamespot.com/features/the-last-of-us-and-grading-on-the-gender-curve-6411051/
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2...e-solution-to-sexism-in-games-but-its-a-start
http://radicalmadre.com/the-last-of-us-a-feminist-perspective/
Upon which the makers apparently see it fit to defend themselves:
http://venturebeat.com/2013/08/05/the-last-of-us-female-characters/
I think they just need to be given ample time and space and they’ll manage to self-destruct.
Another word that they seem to misappropriate to the point that it might lose all meaning is “misogyny” for anything else than the hatred or contempt for women:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/misogyny
http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/misogyny