NSFW Best Thread Ever [No SJW-related posts allowed]

[Luzur]

this comment was the best and a fit description:

“No reasonable person thinks like this”

OMG you are soooo ignorant!

/sarcasm

Welcome to the world of the uber left wing and uber vocal social justice warrior Tumblr crowd. Everyone’s a special snowflake that will melt if they feel offended over anything, and believe me they will find something to be offended over.

 

[The Glitterdust Golem]

Here at RPS, we have something of an audience that would be particularly enticed by seeing more female champions in the design of, say, League of Legend's Kayle or perhaps sporting some of the Souls' series conservative, practically sensible armour fashions. They find that such approaches are refreshing amidst the more common, titillating designs of heroic fantasy. Do you think yours is a game that might hope to approach an audience like ours? One that we also think wouldn't be especially alien to non-reader tastes.

There you go, RPS. There you go. I even tried to waffle around the point a little bit.

 

[felipepepe]

I feel oppressed by MATRIARCHY on how Lobo went from a manly bad-ass to a twilight-vampire-like pretty boy:

 

[bot]

I wonder how many Codexers:
(a) whine whenever someone mentions that the platemail bikini thing might be a tad sexist

but ALSO....

(b) are amongst the first to cry 'FAAAGGGGOOOOTTTTT-EEELLLLLLFFFFF' with their fingers oustretched like Donald Sutherland at the end of Invasion of the Body Snatchers, whenever they see a game with the manga-ish style of a pretty-boy, feminine looking, ultra-thin youthly male lead?


You do realise it's the same thing in both cases, don't you? Presenting a character that quite a few members of one sex find rather attractive, but in a way that demeans the intelligence of everyone else. You know that feeling you get when you play a game with a Cloud style feminine pretty-boy character (ala Leonardo de Caprio circa Titanic)? It isn't a 'oh my sensibility is offended'. It's a 'WHY THE FUCK WOULD I WANT TO PLAY THAT GUY?' feeling. Why would a girl in a platemail bikini be any different?

Few mainstream feminist critics argue that there shouldn't be sex appeal, or nudity for that matter, in gaming. But just like you can do a male lead that has sex appeal without going the Cloud model, do you really need to go the female equivalent of Cloud in every single game?

Seems to me you failed to notice a slight difference between the "journo" and your typical codexer. While everyone lobbies for stuff according to their personal, subjective sensibilities, only the RPS guy and his likes claim to have the moral high ground while doing so. I see no problem saying "fuck you" to a dev when they choose to pander to a group one doesn't belong to, but screaming "bloody murder! you monsters!" when one is not catered to just outs you out as a manipulative sociopath. People can see through this faux ethics bullshit.

 

[bot]

I feel oppressed by MATRIARCHY on how Lobo went from a manly bad-ass to a twilight-vampire-like pretty boy:

Holy shit, when did this happen? Don't be that girl! Don't rape my childhood!

 

[WhiskeyWolf]

Lobo? What have they done to you?

 

[Darth Roxor]

Was zum Teufel

 

[UserNamer]

forgive my posting spree but that call of dooty doom parody is really funny. "art of movement", "this place... it's full of acid!", and so on. Great video

 

[warpig]

OMG, Lobo reincarnated as a J-faggot, I hope this is some kind of sick joke.

 

[Roguey]

Poochie-Lobo is a cargo cult attempt at keeping contemporary since the space biker look is dated. DC sure as hell isn't trying to appeal to women.

Of course Roguey will agree with the sad little cunts shoehorning SJW into absolutely everything they do. How's your Tumblr Feminism working out for you? You change the world yet?

Non-exploitative designs aren't "shoehorning social justice warriorism."

The world is better than it was 50 years ago. It would be considered rapid progress if you keep the entirety of human history in mind.

 

[Grim Monk]

Poochie-Lobo is a cargo cult attempt at keeping contemporary since the space biker look is dated. DC sure as hell isn't trying to appeal to women.

Of course Roguey will agree with the sad little cunts shoehorning SJW into absolutely everything they do. How's your Tumblr Feminism working out for you? You change the world yet?

Non-exploitative designs aren't "shoehorning social justice warriorism."

The world is better than it was 50 years ago. It would be considered rapid progress if you keep the entirety of human history in mind.

Okay then:

50 years ago people were still measuring shirt length make sure it wasn't "indecent".

300 years ago a husband and wife kissing in public would get a public pillorying.

Seems we're moving backward...

 

[ERYFKRAD]

I feel oppressed by MATRIARCHY on how Lobo went from a manly bad-ass to a twilight-vampire-like pretty boy:

Holy shit, when did this happen? Don't be that girl! Don't rape my childhood!

WHAT THE HELL HAVE THEY DONE TO LOBO?!

 

[Dexter]

Okay then:

50 years ago people were still measuring shirt length make sure it wasn't "indecent".

300 years ago a husband and wife kissing in public would get a public pillorying.

Seems we're moving backward...

http://www.historybyzim.com/2012/06/bathing-suit-arrests-chicago-1922/

Spoiler

Bathing Suit Bans & Arrests, 1922


Photo Credit: Sarah Albee Blog

Two of the bathers being escorted off a Chicago beach by a police woman in 1922. The bathers were breaking a law banning abbreviated bathing suits.


Photo Credit: Messy Nessy Chic Blog

Bathing beauties being arrested for defying a Chicago edict banning abbreviated bathing suits on beaches.


Photo Credit: National Photo Co./Shorpy

June 30, 1922: Washington policeman Bill Norton measuring the distance between knee and suit at the Tidal Basin bathing beach after Col. Sherrill, Superintendent of Public Buildings and Grounds, issued an order that suits not be over six inches above the knee.


Photo Credit: Free Republic

Policemen measuring Peggy Graves’s swimming costume, to check whether it meets minimum clothing requirements, 1933

Should also check these out: http://www.comicartville.com/comicscode.htm

Spoiler

CODE FOR EDITORIAL MATTER

General Standards Part A

1. Crimes shall never be presented in such a way as to create sympathy for the criminal, to promote distrust of the forces of law and justice, or to inspire others with a desire to imitate criminals.
2. No comics shall explicitly present the unique details and methods of a crime.
3. Policemen, judges, government officials, and respected institutions shall never be presented in such a way as to create disrespect for established authority.
4. If crime is depicted it shall be as a sordid and unpleasant activity.
5. Criminals shall not be presented so as to be rendered glamorous or to occupy a position which creates the desire for emulation.
6. In every instance good shall triumph over evil and the criminal punished for his misdeeds.
7. Scenes of excessive violence shall be prohibited. Scenes of brutal torture, excessive and unnecessary knife and gun play, physical agony, gory and gruesome crime shall be eliminated.
8. No unique or unusual methods of concealing weapons shall be shown.
9. Instances of law enforcement officers dying as a result of a criminal's activities should be discouraged.
10. The crime of kidnapping shall never be portrayed in any detail, nor shall any profit accrue to the abductor or kidnapper. The criminal or the kidnapper must be punished in every case.
11. The letter of the word "crime" on a comics magazine shall never be appreciably greater than the other words contained in the title. The word "crime" shall never appear alone on a cover.
12. Restraint in the use of the word "crime" in titles or sub-titles shall be exercised.

General Standards Part B

1. No comics magazine shall use the word horror or terror in its title.
2. All scenes of horror, excessive bloodshed, gory or gruesome crimes, depravity, lust, sadism, masochism shall not be permitted.
3. All lurid, unsavory, gruesome illustrations shall be eliminated.
4. Inclusion of stories dealing with evil shall be used or shall be published only where the intent is to illustrate a moral issue and in no case shall evil be presented alluringly nor as to injure the sensibilities of the reader.
5. Scenes dealing with, or instruments associated with walking dead, torture, vampires and vampirism, ghouls, cannibalism and werewolfism are prohibited.

General Standards Part C

All elements or techniques not specifically mentioned herein, but which are contrary to the spirit and intent of the Code, and are considered violations of good taste or decency, shall be prohibited.

Dialogue

1. Profanity, obscenity, smut, vulgarity, or words or symbols which have acquired undesirable meanings are forbidden.
2. Special precautions to avoid references to physical afflictions of deformities shall be taken.
3. Although slang and colloquialisms are acceptable, excessive use should be discouraged and wherever possible good grammar shall be employed.

Religion

1. Ridicule or attack on any religious or racial group is never permissible.

Costume

1. Nudity in any form is prohibited, as is indecent or undue exposure.
2. Suggestive and salacious illustration or suggestive posture is unacceptable.
3. All characters shall be depicted in dress reasonably acceptable to society.
4. Females shall be drawn realistically without exaggeration of any physical qualities. NOTE: It should be recognized that all prohibitions dealing with costume, dialogue, or artwork apply as specifically to the cover of a comic magazine as they do to the contents.

Marriage and Sex

1. Divorce shall not be treated humorously nor represented as desirable.
2. Illicit sex relations are neither to be hinted at or portrayed. Violent love scenes as well as sexual abnormalities are unacceptable.
3. Respect for parents, the moral code, and for honorable behavior shall be fostered. A sympathetic understanding of the problems of love is not a license for moral distortion.
4. The treatment of love-romance stories shall emphasize the value of the home and the sanctity of marriage.
5. Passion or romantic interest shall never be treated in such a way as to stimulate the lower and baser emotions.
6. Seduction and rape shall never be shown or suggested.
7. Sex perversion or any inference to same is strictly forbidden.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_Picture_Production_Code

Spoiler

Resolved, That those things which are included in the following list shall not appear in pictures produced by the members of this Association, irrespective of the manner in which they are treated:

1. Pointed profanity – by either title or lip – this includes the words "God," "Lord," "Jesus," "Christ" (unless they be used reverently in connection with proper religious ceremonies), "hell," "damn," "Gawd," and every other profane and vulgar expression however it may be spelled;
2. Any licentious or suggestive nudity-in fact or in silhouette; and any lecherous or licentious notice thereof by other characters in the picture;
3. The illegal traffic in drugs;
4. Any inference of sex perversion;
5. White slavery;
6. Miscegenation (sex relationships between the white and black races);
7. Sex hygiene and venereal diseases;
8. Scenes of actual childbirth – in fact or in silhouette;
9. Children's sex organs;
10. Ridicule of the clergy;
11. Willful offense to any nation, race or creed;

And be it further resolved, That special care be exercised in the manner in which the following subjects are treated, to the end that vulgarity and suggestiveness may be eliminated and that good taste may be emphasized:

1. The use of the flag;
2. International relations (avoiding picturizing in an unfavorable light another country's religion, history, institutions, prominent people, and citizenry);
3. Arson;
4. The use of firearms;
5. Theft, robbery, safe-cracking, and dynamiting of trains, mines, buildings, etc. (having in mind the effect which a too-detailed description of these may have upon the moron);
6. Brutality and possible gruesomeness;
7. Technique of committing murder by whatever method;
8. Methods of smuggling;
9. Third-degree methods;
10. Actual hangings or electrocutions as legal punishment for crime;
11. Sympathy for criminals;
12. Attitude toward public characters and institutions;
13. Sedition;
14. Apparent cruelty to children and animals;
15. Branding of people or animals;
16. The sale of women, or of a woman selling her virtue;
17. Rape or attempted rape;
18. First-night scenes;
19. Man and woman in bed together;
20. Deliberate seduction of girls;
21. The institution of marriage;
22. Surgical operations;
23. The use of drugs;
24. Titles or scenes having to do with law enforcement or law-enforcing officers;
25. Excessive or lustful kissing, particularly when one character or the other is a "heavy".

They were really "progressive" back in the 30s/50s.

 

[Roguey]

Okay then:

50 years ago people were still measuring shirt length make sure it wasn't "indecent".

300 years ago a husband and wife kissing in public would get a public pillorying.

Seems we're moving backward...

Ah yes women having the freedom to choose how they dress and men being gross are the same because--

Here's an image that will hopefully help you understand, but probably not.

 

[Grim Monk]

Ah yes women having the freedom to choose how they dress and men being gross are the same because--

Unless they "choose" to dress in a manner that some Feminists consider "objectifying".

They are instantly "gender traitors", "self hating", or brainwashed witless pawns of (men being gross) "The Patriarchy..."

And speaking of the objectifying "Chainmail Bikini" Art Style, I wonder if you can tell me who the following women is...

Spoiler

Margaret Brundage, born Margaret Hedda Johnson (December 9, 1900 – April 9, 1976) was an American illustrator and painter who is remembered chiefly for having illustrated the pulp magazine Weird Tales. Working in pastels on illustration board, she created most of the covers for Weird Tales between 1933 and 1938.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Margaret_Brundage

 

[Stainless Veteran]

Okay then:

50 years ago people were still measuring shirt length make sure it wasn't "indecent".

300 years ago a husband and wife kissing in public would get a public pillorying.

Seems we're moving backward...

Ah yes women having the freedom to choose how they dress and men being gross are the same because--

Here's an image that will hopefully help you understand, but probably not.

Eh, I like how caricaturist drew bald spots and pot bellies on those comic book creators. So I guess if those two were looking like supermodels it wouldn't be sexist.

 

[Unkillable Cat]

Lobo? What have they done to you?

 

[Quatlo]

Holy shit, when did this happen? Don't be that girl! Don't rape my childhood!

It gets worse, here, have a screen from that comic:

He constantly talks to himself in those edgy black text boxes. And reminds us that we don't know him.

If anyone is curious you can find more of that in Justice League 23.2

 

[Zewp]

I wonder how many Codexers:
(a) whine whenever someone mentions that the platemail bikini thing might be a tad sexist

but ALSO....

(b) are amongst the first to cry 'FAAAGGGGOOOOTTTTT-EEELLLLLLFFFFF' with their fingers oustretched like Donald Sutherland at the end of Invasion of the Body Snatchers, whenever they see a game with the manga-ish style of a pretty-boy, feminine looking, ultra-thin youthly male lead?

It's not even that I necessarily disagree. The whole sexist issue aside, over-sexualised characters are simply dumb and unimaginative, but is it really necessary for RPS to bring it up every single chance they get? Not to mention that now they're even jumping at shadows. If a female character wears a tight suit in a game OMG SEXISM. If the camera lingers on a female's assets for half a second longer than RPS likes OMG SEXISM. If a female has boobs then OMG SEXISM.

If you want to bring a message across, it's in your best interest not to shove it down everyone's throats to the point where everyone wants to gag if they just so much as hear you open your mouth? Their message might not be bad, but their method of campaigning is so obnoxious that I'd rather shove pencils into my eyes than listen to them, much less agree with them.

 

[UserNamer]

who even reads comic books anymore? The same guys championing worthless social justice causes that's who (for the most part). They lament incessantly about women being objectified in their stupid, badly drawn comic books while not being able to stop reading them or drawing them that way. It's mostly low t social warriors cannibalizing other low t social justice warriors.

And what the hell is that caricature even talking about? The dialogue is utterly incomprehensible to someone who is not well versed in comic book batman current exploits and advanced womyn studies esoterica (ie sane people). "I am in control of my desires and they happen to be the same sort of CREEPY and immature desires some guys have". What the hell does that even mean. Are they implying comic book readers are sexually attracted to batman? or that a woman being attracted to batman is objectifying and sexist because women are supposed to be only attracted to low t social warrior? Whatever

 

[Zewp]

Non-exploitative designs aren't "shoehorning social justice warriorism."

I'm not talking about non-exploitative designs, I'm talking about RPS's insistence on shoehorning their SJW crusade in wherever they get the chance. There's a time and a place for everything. An interview about a MOBA is neither the time, nor the place.

I actually hope Blizzard refuses to grant these fucking clowns interviews in the future.

 

[Quatlo]

I love how those social justice fighters never comment anything about Japan because they are different culture and we have to be tolerant
RPS was shit before but because of their "tolerant" and "lets have educated discussion" crap you can't even say that gamepads blow in first person shooters without being yelled at, and being called a close minded pc supremacist. Also obviously you can't have power fantasies in games, books and movies anymore. Everything must be equally crap so some boring sad asshat will not get offended that they remind him of his shitty lifestyle.
I can't wait for their interview about new chess game and how its misoginistic to have only one female piece on board.

 

[Jashiin]

I love how those social justice fighters never comment anything about Japan because they are different culture and we have to be tolerant
RPS was shit before but because of their "tolerant" and "lets have educated discussion" crap you can't even say that gamepads blow in first person shooters without being yelled at, and being called a close minded pc supremacist. Also obviously you can't have power fantasies in games, books and movies anymore. Everything must be equally crap so some boring sad asshat will not get offended that they remind him of his shitty lifestyle.
I can't wait for their interview about new chess game and how its misoginistic to have only one female piece on board.

They've become completely unreadable. Perhaps all the staff in a van getting crushed by a truck in traffic is in our future.. nothing less than painful death will stop those assholes and their fucking agenda.

 

[bot]

 

[evdk]

He constantly talks to himself in those edgy black text boxes. And reminds us that we don't know him.

If anyone is curious you can find more of that in Justice League 23.2

You know, I dislike most of the published Lobo material (especially the issues when they forgot he's a parody), but nobody deserves this.

Barry Allen is an utter, utter cunt.