Prime Junta
Guest
/me checks out Undertale's site and launch trailer
.
.
.
.
Wut?
.
.
.
.
Wut?
Yeah, but it came out in 2014....Age of Wonders 3 is a better cRPG than most games in the poll.
Yeah, but it came out in 2014....Age of Wonders 3 is a better cRPG than most games in the poll.
Predictions:
1:Witcher 3
2:Undertale
3:AoD
4:Fallout 4
5: PoE
I doubt that either game will make the top 5.Does anyone actually think Fallout 4 and PoE have any chance to be in top 5?
It's funny you know, fallout 4 getting shit on so much on this forum, meanwhile, several high profile members are praising the very definition of DECLINE in terms of UnderTaile.
Textbook definition of irony, if I ever saw one.
I've banned the following users for voting #5 for Undertale:
Yes, and it will be easy to dismiss the 100 newly created accounts to rig the outcome too, or the scripts created for the same purpose (apparently there were bots trying to alter the outcome of that google doc poll)
Stuck between wanting PoE winning to give spergs an aneurysm, Witcher 3 being the best one is played this year and highly disliking Witcher 3's streamlined dialogue system.
Yes, and it will be easy to dismiss the 100 newly created accounts to rig the outcome too, or the scripts created for the same purpose (apparently there were bots trying to alter the outcome of that google doc poll)
Which cunt is sad enough to spend time of that?
I played almost nothing due to lack of time. Can we postpone the 2015 GOTY poll for one year, please?
The exclusion of undesirables is how they do things in crypto-fascist democracies. Here in the free world we authorise all options and use media propaganda to ensure nobody is willing to vote for undesirables.It looks as though suddenly every other grinder shit game that we wouldn't even give half a glance is now Codex GOTY poll material?
And I haven't even heard of about half of these games before. A quarter of it gave me "WTF is this doing in a GOTY poll?" moments and I have yet to play half the games in the remaining quarter.
Only one winner should be picked anyway, and maybe a runner-up. A top 5 list gives the impression that there were 5 amazing RPGs in the same year, which happens how often?
And then naming and shaming people for how they voted.
Having looked at the results so far, I'd argue there's merit in publishing the full list.
And then naming and shaming people for how they voted.