Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Your favorite RPG villain?

JarlFrank

I like Thief THIS much
Patron
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
33,136
Location
KA.DINGIR.RA.KI
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
Kerghan from Arcanum, of course!
 

Lurkar

Scholar
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
791
Malak was a shitty villian that people are DRASTICALLY overthinking. I really doubt Bioware thought of all these grand plots beneath the surface, and tried to make Malak this subtle parody or anything like that. He was Generic Sith #284.

As for me, Kerghan from Arcanum, The Practical Incarnation from PS:T, and Kreia.
 

Lumpy

Arcane
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Messages
8,525
Araman. A villain only insofar as he opposed the player, as he was a good guy deep inside (well, True Neutral if we go by the character sheet). You couldn't not sympathize with him, what with his tragic (but amazingly, not angsty) history. The contrast between the innocent child from Akachi's memories and the grim wizard of the present day was most depressing.
 

MetalCraze

Arcane
Joined
Jul 3, 2007
Messages
21,104
Location
Urkanistan
Lurkar said:
Malak was a shitty villian that people are DRASTICALLY overthinking. I really doubt Bioware thought of all these grand plots beneath the surface, and tried to make Malak this subtle parody or anything like that. He was Generic Sith #284.

exactly.
still it's funny how someone tries to find a subtle context in -bioware- games.
 

LaDoushe

Scholar
Joined
Jan 28, 2006
Messages
127
Mike in JA2. I know the first time I found him I was using my typical "economy" team and shit a brick that MD and Grunty were going to have to kill Mike. Villains are always cooler when they're double-crossers, which is something rare in RPGs.
 

Kingston

Arcane
Joined
Jan 13, 2007
Messages
4,392
Location
I lack the wit to put something hilarious here
LaDoushe said:
Mike in JA2.

Que "JA is not an rpg! - YEs it is it has all the elements -But its not one because . . ." discussion.

Anyhoo, I loved Lacroix. The character's demeanor was just... awesome. A very charismatic character, thanks to the voice acting. I liked Kerghan's reasoning for killing everbody. And The Transcendant One was just badass.
 

Radisshu

Prophet
Joined
Jul 16, 2007
Messages
5,623
Eh. Irenicus was actually really cool, mostly because of his voice acting. Speaking about motivation and stuff though, SEPIROT LOL. No, the Master. Having a huge lump of mutated goo called the Master would be kind of lame if it weren't for fallouts retro sci-fi elements, and he was pretty interesting as a character.
 

racofer

Thread Incliner
Joined
Apr 5, 2008
Messages
25,608
Location
Your ignore list.
Todd Howard. He can crush any RPG player with one mighty blow, and followed by his fearsome warcry: "All your games are belong to us!!1!GRAFIX1!!"
 

deuxhero

Arcane
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
11,381
Location
Flowery Land
skyway said:
Darth Malak is a generic villain. how can he be even a good one? it's that type of villain - "I'm so bad, I shit all over everything you love and I also want to rule the world! muahahaha!"

really if you want some encyclopedia of cliches - go get kotor...

Acctualy if you want an encylopedia of clitches, the internet has something close to that.
 

Jaime Lannister

Arbiter
Joined
Jun 15, 2007
Messages
7,183
JarlFrank said:
On a sidenote, an RPG where you play a villain would be awesome.

Like in Wizardry 4.

Or, um, Fallout 2? That game was the one game where you could truly be the bad guy.
 

sabishii

Arbiter
Joined
Aug 18, 2005
Messages
1,325
Location
Gatornation
Lumpy said:
Araman. A villain only insofar as he opposed the player, as he was a good guy deep inside (well, True Neutral if we go by the character sheet). You couldn't not sympathize with him, what with his tragic (but amazingly, not angsty) history. The contrast between the innocent child from Akachi's memories and the grim wizard of the present day was most depressing.
Nice pick. Thinking about it, MotB might have been a truly memorable game if it were standalone and not abstractly shortened as an expansion.
 

kingcomrade

Kingcomrade
Edgy
Joined
Oct 16, 2005
Messages
26,884
Location
Cognitive Elite HQ
Sephiroth. You get to see his agonizing fall from grace through the game, and his clever manipulations and amazing visual presentation kinda set the bar for all villains since. Not many have lived up to his example.
 

SkeleTony

Augur
Joined
Aug 17, 2006
Messages
938
nik2008ofs said:
SkeleTony said:
nik2008ofs said:
Jon Irenicus. If I could, I would have sided with him against the damned elves that had the arrogance to rob him of his soul and then acted all surprised that he turned into a homicidal monster.

Meh. He could have almost been interesting if not for the JRPG animefagness of him. The whole "So you thought you kille me the other 9 times you killed me but now I am back even more powafull than EVEH! crap sucked.

You mean, just like Nuclear Winter? At any rate, what kind of fag chooses an intentional cardboard cutout as the best villain ever?

Nuclear Winter did not come back from death. Play the game sometime. And I have no idea what kind of fag chooses an intentional cardboard cutout as the best villain ever. Reading comprehension is your friend agro-boy.
 

xantrius

Liturgist
Joined
Sep 30, 2007
Messages
228
Location
Ascending (Denmark)
My favourite antagonistically a-like character is Kreia from SW: Knights of the old republic 2

May the bombs of enduring freedom purge the CRPG scene of the formula of villain and hero and replace it with protagonist and antagonist for good ASAP... *sigh*..
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
6,207
Location
The island of misfit mascots
I liked ol' Jon

SkeleTony said:
Meh. He could have almost been interesting if not for the JRPG animefagness of him. The whole "So you thought you kille me the other 9 times you killed me but now I am back even more powafull than EVEH! crap sucked.

Where do you get that from?
SPOILERS
,..
.
.
.
.
.
SPOILERS.
,..
.
.
.
.
.SPOILERS
.
Let's break down the PC v Jon and Bodhi encounters, shall we? Not including the multiple dialogues b/w you and Bodhi, and the dream sequences b/w you and Bhaal-posing-as-Jon (i SAID spoilers didn't I? Anyway, it isn't explicitly said that it was Bhaal, but they give it away by (a) Jon not knowing what you are talking about when you mention the dreams, and (b) Jon's diary which conspicuously indicates that aside from his desire for revenge on the elves, he isn't particularly evil (unlike Bodhi) - all his experiments and cruelty are aimed at the one target, he has no interest in the kind of random evilness that dream-state-Jon has, at least until after he replaces his soul with yours):
(1) Fight (scripted) outside Irenicus' dungeon initially b/w Irenicus, the Shadow Thieves and you, interrupted by the Amnish mage council-police thingies (forget their name), where Jon agrees to go with them as long as they also take Imoen - Jon basically wins that one as he gets his future new lair and access to a Bhaal-spawn

(2) Fight between Bodhi (at that stage still weakend through soullessness, though that gets explained a chapter later), her minions and yourself. You win until Bodhi escapes. Ok that's a win to the PC so I'll make the tally 1-1, but it is logically explained: ok the 'I was just testing you' explanation was a bit daft, but the idea that Bodhi was weaker at that stage of the game (stated in Jon's diary, also a couple of other places) due to soulsickness kicking in hard is logical in the context of the plot and not particularly anime-like.

(3) EITHER Jon and Bodhi capture the player, OR Jon and Bodhi receive the player courtesy of Yoshimo's betrayal. Jon takes you on a tour of the asylum, and then quickly sends you unconscious with considerable ease. Then he steals your soul. Tells you that Bodhi has already been given Imoen's soul, as (gasp, shock) Imoen is a half-sister and another Bhaal-spawn and that's why Gorian adopted both of you. That's a win to J+B: 1-2.

(4) A now healthy and Bhaal-spawn Bodhi attacks you and party in the tunnels beneath the asylum. You turn into the Slayer for the first time, drive her off and then attack your own party. (You do so again after your next rest, and randomly after that for another chapter or so until you learn what's happening and how to control it). No casualities on other side, not even an unconsciousness. Unlike (2), which I counted, this one doesn't involve you beating the crap out of Bodhi, so I'm not giving it a score. Net Score now 1-2-1 (1 to you, 2 to the villains, 1 draw).

(5) You and about 15 other high-level mages, freed from the asylum, gang-attack Irenicus (who now has your soul). Massively outnumbered, Irenicus does the plausible thing and flees. Still no villain deaths, Jon doesn't really get beat on, score now 1-2-2.

(6) You and (depending on which groups you do side-quests for in earlier chapters - yes, in BG2 Bioware actually flirted briefly with C+C, before deciding that MOAR ACKSHUN would sell better on consoles) any or all of: the shadow thieves, the paladins and Drittz's party all invade Bodhi's lair, killing her and her henchies. As mentioned, the game has a plausible explanation for Bodhi's increased strength and your having the numbers (and own increased strength) to take her on. Score now 2-2-2.

(7) After some dragon-killing and some meaningless combat (but far less of the later than later Bioware titles) you finally get another shot at Jon. By this stage Bhaal has made clear (by giving you the Slayer, and in your numerous dreams when he poses as Irenicus) that he disapproves of Jon stealing his child's soul, and that he is giving you strength to defeat him. Jon has the bhaalspawn soul, and even when he had soulsickness he was pretty uber. Plausible in-game explanations for both of you getting stronger over the game. You kill Jon, after 2 reloads to replan your strategy for making sure he doesn't pwn your party with time-stop and imprisonment spells, but as your soul goes to hell it, and Bhaal, pulls you with it. Score now 3-2-2.

(8) Final fight in hell, with both you and Jon in Slayer form. You win and get your soul back, frustrating Jon's revenge and saving yourself, but not saving the world or anything like that (if anything, you and Imoen pose a greater threat than one guy wanting revenge on an elven city did). Again, Bioware flirted with the notion of 'ooh storyline that is personal to the main character' before deciding that 'Chosen-one-saves-the-world' is easier to explain to 5 year olds, and 45 year old console gamers with the minds of 5 year olds. Score now 4-2-2.

Hardly a 'You killed me 9 times but now I'm MOAR POWERFUL' incident. Jon is ONE of my favourite RPG villains, along with La Croix, the Transcendant One, Ravel, Kreia, and Walter Simons. What I loved about Jon Irenicus (apart from the very very solid voice acting), and BG2 in general, despite disliking everything else that Bioware has ever done, was that it WASN'T the same old 'bad guy waits at the end dungeon for you to come kill him' where you think that the guy has to be the SLOWEST ACTING threat the world has ever faced (I'll just wait here in my throne room while my eventual killer grinds some more kobolds'). AND it wasn't a 'you've killed me 9 times but now I'm stronger' contrived Anime plot. It ran like a decent movie villain - you kept on interacting with the villains throughout the game, and rather than having a series of meaningless 'end bosses' for each dungeon, you'd keep having different encounters, fights, chases and escapes from THEM, sometimes them fleeing, sometimes you fleeing etc. A film writer would be laughed into the unemployment line if he wrote an action film where the only interaction between the hero and villain was the final fight - the villain needs to be a constant menace to the hero if he is to be plausible. What's more, Bioware didn't just rely on players accepting the convention: they gave both the player and the villains plausible plot-related reasons for being weaker in earlier fights and stronger in later ones, needing superiour numbers in some, but not in others. Sure, the game still suffered from typical Bioware weaknesses in other areas. But the villains it got right, in their character design, dialogue, voice-acting and their plot usage. Which makes their later (and earlier) work so frustratingly bad by comparison.
 

mjorkerina

Scholar
Joined
Jun 5, 2007
Messages
344
Location
Montpellier, France
Re: I liked ol' Jon

Azrael the cat said:
But the villains it got right, in their character design, dialogue, voice-acting and their plot usage. Which makes their later (and earlier) work so frustratingly bad by comparison.

This is why I was so pissed off with Bioware when I bought NWN1. BG2 isn't a stellar game but it was so big of an improvement over that shitty dungeon hack named BG1 that I thought it was still possible for them to better themselves again. But fuck. NWN1 was the worst thing they pulled out. There isn't a single thing that can redeem that game. Shitty story. Shitty combat. Shitty music. Shitty graphics (yes, even for its time.) It doesn't have *any* excuse, anything that stands out of the turds.
 

Jormungandr

Liturgist
Joined
Mar 16, 2007
Messages
127
Kefka from FFVI. The guy's just crazy and cold, ruthless. And I love the laugh. Besides, what's not to like about a guy who poisons innocents and blows up the world? Damn cool in my book.
 

SuicideBunny

(ノ ゜Д゜)ノ ︵ ┻━┻
Joined
May 1, 2007
Messages
8,943
Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Torment: Tides of Numenera
Lesifoere said:
Seeing the MotB PC as a villain is using flexible interpretation
....flexible? not the way i played.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom