Is Fallout the most consistently great RPG trilogy out there?

[AMysteriousStranger]

Talking about the games set in the west coast (1, 2, and New Vegas). I think all of them are great but really thinking about it, they're the only trilogy of role playing games where I consistently loved all the entries compared to its other contemporaries that I can think of: the Mass Effect trilogy declined with each title (1 was a solid sci-rpg, 2 had great character writing but the plot was suffered from being illogical, and 3 was mediocre) and The Witcher trilogy was the opposite case (1 showed promise but was let down by its limitations, 2 was pretty good, and 3 is now considered as one of the greatest RPGs of all time which I agree with).

 

[Covenant]

How can you say it's consistently great when you have to skip one of the main games in order to make your trilogy?

 

[Circuit the Short]

It's Realms of Arkania

 

[Butter]

Fallout 3, 4, and 76. Checkmate.

 

[buffalo bill]

Quest for Glory 1-4
Ultima 4-7
Wizardry 6-8
Gold Box games

 

[ProphetSword]

Gold Box games

Yeah, man!

Pool of Radiance, Curse of the Azure Bonds, Secret of the Silv--oh...wait...

 

[Swigen]

Nope, Diablo is.

 

[DalekFlay]

You're gonna get some try-hard bashing, but I actually agree I think. 1, 2 and New Vegas make a great trilogy, and I can't think of three connected RPGs with the same quality average. Maybe if you count BG2's expansion as a third game, but even then I'm not super BG fan.

 

[Mustawd]

You guys are retarded if you’re seriously responding to this troll.