The game's already put a big ass Security Camera Footage zone control on the screen. This means they'll definitely check out their camera footage to see if there's anything wrong. Did you think they won't notice the camera being disabled?
Consistent with the rest of the game, yeah, no, especially not when the cameras still work, it just doesn't record. Expecting things to operate one a "make sense" game-logic one moment and on a "rules-bound" explicit game-logic the next is either delusion or hypocrisy.
as the devs intended, they're working.
That'd just mean that the devs are shit. At least I gave them the benefit of the doubt and assumed that this was just another bug, which would make a whole lot more sense.
You're in stealth, you disabled the cameras, you weren't detected by anybody the whole time. The reaction goes later when you leave the prison, when it's time for the guards to check on the camera footage, and also checking if there's any cell doors open.
There's countless of different ways to handle this better. There's actual guards walking around those cells that would notice if doors are open - but they never react to them. If they'd do, then that'd make sense, but they don't. Trying to come up with post-hoc rationalizations how something nonsensical makes sense because of unrelated circumstances that are not actually expressed to the player in any way just reeks of grasping at straws out of some misguided fanboyism.
Also, if the game actually make the alarm goes off and guards becoming hostile the very exact moment you disabled the cameras/opened a cell door, I bet your ass you're going to complain anyway.
Bullshit - I was very surprised when the doors didn't actually have alarms on them at all, precisely because that'd "make sense".
And so does anyone else, because why the fuck would the alarm goes off just because a cell door is opened while the cameras are disabled?
Because the doors actually have alarms? It's not a novel concept. Hell, it's weird that they aren't all opened remotely at all. Again, the cameras aren't actually
disabled. They're just not recording.
But when you leave a cell door open, and worst, you disabled the camera just because you want to lollygag around even though there's no particular importance for you to do so at the moment, then the game better react to it. Once again, good ol' plain choice and consequence, with the system working as intended.
I doubt it, I think you're just trying to come up with bullshit as to why the game could possibly be working as intended, even though none of this is actually articulated by the game in any way other than to render a quest practically impossible to resolve long after the fact.
Hahaha, oh wow, the delusion is real. The games have psychic enemies and scripted events, there's nothing intricate about it.
https://www.underrail.com/wiki/index.php?title=Zone_Control
Yes, exactly. There's nothing "intricate" about Zone Control, and most of the time it's entirely arbitrary. The game
never operates on a "makes sense" basis, except, of course, when you need an inconvenient excuse to explain away why something is fucked.
The bigger issue is you miss out bigly unless do it the diplomatic way.
Eh, I'm fine with that, and had the game not bugged out on me, I would probably not have resolved it the diplomatic way, because that's not the kind of character I'm playing. I consider the choice of resolution to be very much a matter of choices and consequences, and it makes sense that exonerating the guy would carry a better long-term reward than just breaking him out (or killing him).
Not everything is straight-forward, and I think the quest design is richer because of it.
).
