Tehdagah
Arcane
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2012
- Messages
- 9,322
They released a lot of good free games though.No, if they are shit.New free games every week is a great thing.
They released a lot of good free games though.No, if they are shit.New free games every week is a great thing.
They could afford to do it with a 0% cut. They're not doing it to make money, they're doing it to strongarm their way into the market and knock out smaller competitors.They don't, Valve can drop the % while still offering these services. Epic charges 12% and is still able to offer 8+ free games every month.
Valve should step up then.They could afford to do it with a 0% cut. They're not doing it to make money, they're doing it to strongarm their way into the market and knock out smaller competitors.They don't, Valve can drop the % while still offering these services. Epic charges 12% and is still able to offer 8+ free games every month.
No, they couldn't, the moment they cut into Steam bussines in a noticeable way, Valve will reduce their cut and Epic wll be done. If Epic accumulated a huge loss on the way there it wouldn't be able to recover it.They could afford to do it with a 0% cut. They're not doing it to make money, they're doing it to strongarm their way into the market and knock out smaller competitors.
Valve should step up then.
A reminder you don't own any of these gamesI have over 15k games on Steam on ignore now(which is apparently roughly half of the entire Steam catalogue.) I'd imagine I'm probably in the top .1% — if not even higher — of most games viewed by users on Steam.
From going through all those games I've realized one thing: Most games are awful. I'm not skipping over your game from a lack of exposure, I'm skipping it because something about it sucks. There is no algorithm in the world that can fix most games being complete shit.
This especially applies to games that possibly don't actually suck but I'm tired of seeing rehashes of. 2D "souls-like", metroidvanias, etc., There's so god damn many of them and they all look bland as hell.
Makes sense, the average EGS user is a Fortnite player, they rather play something like Borderlands 3.What % of the pie would I get if I enable the chinese supercorporation to destroy all competition and therefore no longer have a reason to buy games off of competing stores?
THQ Nordic says “absolute majority” of Metro Exodus copies were sold on console
With time more developers will protest against Steam's pre-historic revenue share.Valve should step up then.
They're not a charity, so they shouldn't, unless they get convinced that they'll loose their market ( publishers and devs ) if they don't, which seems unlikely.
Habla Ingles por favor
They don't 'deserve' your money. Consumers don't 'deserve' their products. It's an exchange of money for goods, if you aren't interested in the product, then don't buy it.
Right, which is why they should stfu when people complain that a product doesn't have the features they hoped it would or otherwise wanted and therefore don't use it.
I can't understand why, with your winning personality.
Sure, Valve could run their company at break-even, they could even run it at a loss for absolutely no reason if they wanted to. Valve can do a lot of things. That's not what earning means though.They don't, Valve can drop the % while still offering these services. Epic charges 12% and is still able to offer 8+ free games every month.
Or they simply can reduce the % revenue for all games instead of just games that sell 500k+. Do they really need 30% from games that sell 10k units? It would be barely relevant for Valve, but a huge thing for small developers.Sure, Valve could run their company at break-even, they could even run it at a loss for absolutely no reason if they wanted to. Valve can do a lot of things. That's not what earning means though.
Not relevant for consumers. Recently Amazon released their subsidized Prime service in my country and it's a much better deal the Netflix.Also you have to be really naïve (or dishonest) if you think Epic is able to offer all those free games and break-even on 12%, and aren't just loss-leading by taking advantage of their massive Fortnite coffers.
Relevant enough for them to not change it, as it seems. Also, not relevant for consumers. :^)Or they simply can reduce the % revenue for all games instead of just games that sell 500k+. Do they really need 30% from games that sell 10k units? It would be barely relevant for Valve, but a huge thing for small developers.
As long as you realize that it's unsustainable in the long run then that's fine.Not relevant for consumers. Recently Amazon released their subsidized Prime service in my country and it's a much better deal the Netflix.
He's pointing out that blatant homophobes would rather use Steam with an LGBTQ themed sale than use Epic's featureless tencent store.With apologies in advance for the stupid question, what does the Steam LGBTQ themed sale has to do with the discussion?
He's pointing out that blatant homophobes would rather use Steam with an LGBTQ themed sale than use Epic's featureless tencent store.With apologies in advance for the stupid question, what does the Steam LGBTQ themed sale has to do with the discussion?
Powerful.
Seems like a plus on Steam's part. They provided a list of homo games for you to put on ignore.
With apologies in advance for the stupid question, what does the Steam LGBTQ themed sale has to do with the discussion?
With apologies in advance for the stupid question, what does the Steam LGBTQ themed sale has to do with the discussion?
There's a strong "anti-SJW" contingent here for whom that's a point unto itself, somehow.
If understand correctly Fishy it shows the two pages from what I assume is a US based webpage and what happens if you view the same page but in China.
If understand correctly Fishy it shows the two pages from what I assume is a US based webpage and what happens if you view the same page but in China.
That would be a good point to make and I would apologize for my assumption, but I only see one image?
Epic turning China cuck is definitely a concern, despite Sweeney's insistence otherwise.