Belegarsson
Think about hairy dwarfs all the time ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
May I improve this a bitEpic Cum Dumpsters™ are STILL going about this shit?
Oh, well, I can play at that game too
May I improve this a bitEpic Cum Dumpsters™ are STILL going about this shit?
Oh, well, I can play at that game too
If a developer or publisher chooses to release their game via Steam only, then that's their choice.
Getting money from Epic is also their choice. Getting a bribe is a choice. Epic didn't put a gun to anyone's head.
But did any Steamtard ever complain when a company didn't release their game anywhere else? Nope, they didn't, because they didn't care. All the rage against Epic from cucks who like to rent games while pretending they buy them boils down to "waaah it's not in my favurite shop"
it doesn't require (or even seek out) exclusivity agreements with any of the thousands of other developers and publishers who use Valve's platform.
And like I said a million times, it doesn't make any difference to the user. You HAVE to use Steam to get those game. More than that, an Epic exclusive likely ends after 1 year. There are games on Steam that have been there and only there for like 7 years if not more. And I'm not talking only about Valve's own game. There are way, way more Steam-only games and than probably any other platform. Including consoles. So I really can't see how waiting 1 year to get it somewhere else is worse than waiting forever if you don't like the current client/platform it's on.
You dishonest little sack of shit.
This thread is full of people saying that they don't like Steam's monopolistic status, of people that are purposefully not buying titles on Steam because they're waiting to see if they'll appear on GOG so they can buy it there (for keeps, not rent) and of people that were wary (and still are) of Steam as a DRM platform right from the start. In short, people who DO care.
But you dismiss them all outright and brand them as "Steamtards", because you like that Epic Game Store cock so much and you want to show it as being a viable alternative to Steam, or just viable in general. They aren't, and it'll be a cold day in hell when they ever will be.
"I love monopolies, I am a retard".I will say it again: I, and 99% of normal people, will not install another launcher unless it's a real banger of a game, and then I will promptly uninstall it again once I am done with that game.
The only way you can defeat Steam is by somehow permitting Valve to transfer all your games from there to the other thing - without needing to reinstall them. As that will never happen, any development on gay launchers will only increase piracy.
It's true, 99% people are retarded, so maybe you're right that this launcher will fail.
Why use a launcher that lets devs earn more of your money that you paid them? I see no reason, yep. Let's throw a tantrum instead.
Nobody wanted a single fucking launcher.... ever.
People prefered being able to lend games to their friends and maybe even sell them.
People also really like boxes just like on Vinyl (the covers), and Manuals... they liked manuals as well.
But no, now i have to use launchers, pay the same price like back in the day (even though i dont get a box, manual or physical media) & dont even actually own the fucking game.
EA cant get people to use origin even though they give away AAA games for free every other week, i dont want anymore bloatware by anyone for any reason...
To quote myself from 118 pages ago...
I dont love steam, i hated it, i just accepted it because there was little choice & over time they did improve.
I dont want steams competition to be as good them, i require them to be as good or better.
Epic isnt, epic shat on consumers.
At this point the Epic fairy would have to fly through my window, land on my dick, install epic & grant me free games for enternity.
This thread is full of people saying that they don't like Steam's monopolistic status, of people that are purposefully not buying titles on Steam because they're waiting to see if they'll appear on GOG so they can buy it there (for keeps, not rent) and of people that were wary (and still are) of Steam as a DRM platform right from the start. In short, people who DO care.
But you dismiss them all outright and brand them as "Steamtards", because you like that Epic Game Store cock so much and you want to show it as being a viable alternative to Steam, or just viable in general. They aren't, and it'll be a cold day in hell when they ever will be.
In theory, I only need to wait 1 year for an Epic exclusive to be potentially released on something like GOG (assuming the devs would release on GOG anyway). But what do I do with games that have been on Steam and only Steam for years and years? Oh right, use Steam Epic cocksucker, why don't you like Steam? It totally didn't divide any market, it just became THE market.So I really can't see how waiting 1 year to get it somewhere else is worse than waiting forever if you don't like the current client/platform it's on.
Yes, it pretty much is. From a moral point you can whine all you want about Epic being the Godfather making offers developers can't refuse (which is bullshit, but OK), however from the perspective of the user this is how it stands: You are forced to use Steam to play Steam-only games. There is no choice. Just like how you have to use Epic to play Epic-only games.No, it's the not the same thing at all.
But you dismiss them all outright and brand them as "Steamtards", because you like that Epic Game Store cock so much and you want to show it as being a viable alternative to Steam, or just viable in general. They aren't, and it'll be a cold day in hell when they ever will be.
I see three possible outcomes of this launcher war:
- One launcher defeats the others, becoming a de-facto standart for all major devs and 99% of indies like steam was until recently. (Steam might also win obv.) That's a meh but acceptable outcome, because it would have to be significantly better and user friendly than the others, so I would just migrate from to it
- Many new launchers appear and neither becomes standart, many games become %launchername%-exclusive. The worst and most probable outcome, now I would have to keep not one, but several bloated spyware launchers on my PC to play games
- Many new launchers appear and it makes the genral public boycotting this shit, which leads to one or few major stores embracing the "standalone installer" type of digital distribution (basically what gog does now). That's a :fabulously optimistic: option, no way something as good will happen
Sadly it has some bullshits on what games it allows to be sold there and what not.The only store looking out for consumers is GOG
Sadly it has some bullshits on what games it allows to be sold there and what not.The only store looking out for consumers is GOG
It already allows shit VN games, so what is even your point?I so wonder what would happen if GOG allowed everything in...
Unfortunately, as PC ownership VERY rapidly became more and more accessible to the hoi polloi, the voices of the old guard carried less and less clout. Thus, it wouldn't have mattered how hard the old guard boycotted Steam. It was a boycott doomed to fail.
Thing is, I don't buy the "I hate Steam, but I use it anyway" thing. If you hate it, don't use it. Very simple. Wait for the games to show up somewhere else.
I see three possible outcomes of this launcher war:
- One launcher defeats the others, becoming a de-facto standart for all major devs and 99% of indies like steam was until recently. (Steam might also win obv.) That's a meh but acceptable outcome, because it would have to be significantly better and user friendly than the others, so I would just migrate from to it
- Many new launchers appear and neither becomes standart, many games become %launchername%-exclusive. The worst and most probable outcome, now I would have to keep not one, but several bloated spyware launchers on my PC to play games
- Many new launchers appear and it makes the genral public boycotting this shit, which leads to one or few major stores embracing the "standalone installer" type of digital distribution (basically what gog does now). That's a :fabulously optimistic: option, no way something as good will happen
EA running back to Steam is pretty telling IMO.
GOG Galaxy 2.0 is basically trying to be that too.
Most "normies" I know just click the icon on desktop/taskbar. Pretty sure all these launchers default to autorun on startup.Another (IMO most likely) possibility is that most people are indifferent to spyware/performance impacts and just run every client all the time on their machines but actually do the launching via some meta-client like Playnite. As this develops more I'm sure they'll even proxy the storefronts to include price comparison a la https://isthereanydeal.com/
I'm always surprised how it can be a game breaker for people if they have to use a new client. I had to live with copy protection out of manuals. I'm ok with a few downlaods.
EA running back to Steam is pretty telling IMO.
Steam changed their policy toward AAA games and they can now have 20% officially and probably less unofficially. If 10 more like Epic stores will open and they will all ask for 10% instead of 30% then Steam will have to drop completely 30%.
GOG Galaxy 2.0 is basically trying to be that too.
yup, using it atm. Which is why whole Steam vs Epic stuff deoesn't concern me. I just hit play, epic/steam launch and after i am done with game it closes. They lately even added to see status of steam/epic etc friends and what they do atm. Probably chat will go next.
I find these numbers rather hilarious for what they attempted. Remember they put untold millions into their "Excl000sives" scheme and threw around Free Games every week to try and trick the faint of mind and the results seem to be very disappointing for them. The entire Sales volume for third party games that they managed during their critical first year where they splurged money left and right is lower than what retards paid for Star Shitizen .jpg's. The money they actually made with their 12% cut of that is ~$30 million and they likely paid a lot more into "Excl000sive" deals than they made back, let alone for "Free games".Epic Games today offered an update on the growth of the Epic Games Store. Launched in December of 2018, the store to-date has racked up $680 million in spending from 108 million PC customers.
While much of that total can be accounted for by Epic's own hit Fortnite, the company noted that $251 million has been spent by players on third-party PC games.
I predicted that the Epic Store will likely stick around for a long while, and seeing this I'm not so sure anymore