Orgasm said:
No.
Yes.
So, if somebody offered you 100 g of fine cheese and mediocre cheese for 1 cent and you would have to guess, would you pay?
First of all, no. There is maybe real need for that cheese. You could be really hungry. And depending on your hunger, it could be worth it. Still 100g is not enough and all it's gonna do is tease your appetite. Secondly, the cheese is expendable good. Either way, if you bought/ate/didn't eat it, it would be spoiled as result(pooped or decayed) taking more or mess time.
You don't compare expendable good to fixed goods. The games and the iPhone are affected in a less pronounced manner than cheese, if we take time into consideration. Give or take, if someone changes a storage regularly, a software can last forever.
No.
But you will assert that 1 cent in not comparable to 4 bucks.
Everything is comparable. You just need to choose correct reference point. 4 bucks = 400 cents. lol
And I would say that they are just as comparable as iPhone and 4 bucks and I am not even weighting in you income where you can actually buy in iPhone and use it.
Sure thing. We have a lot of money, let's buy everything we can, no matter the price. And sort everything latter. If you buy shit for 1 cent or 4 bucks, shit stays shit, no matter what. And even worse, those who created the shit we bought will get the wrong impression that their shit actually is not shit. And of course they'll produce even more shit. But who cares, we have a shitload of money.
And if you compare not the 4 bucks but the difference between them and other games it becomes obvious that your reluctance to pay for this game is irrational and emotionally controlled.
With the game you invest into your amusement and the work of creator(so, that they can produce more games). The more you invest, the more you should get amusement in the both runs(short and long). The need for amusement/ to be amused could be considered irrational and unnecessary. Humankind doesn't need amusement to get through the day and do the basic functionalities. So let's summarize, my emotions dictates me that I want amusement and the emotions are irrational. And how can you do something emotionlessly(wtf am i writing)? We're humans, we all have emotions, and everything that affects us, influence us, creates an emotion in the countermeasure.
Thus you must buy the game to be rational.
Wat. Well, define irrationality and rationality in the context of consumerism. That's consumerist society we're living in, we
need must consume to live. And there is no really must. Heck, using "must", "buy", "game" and "irrational" in one sentence is too much of eye blight to behold.
No.
Semantics, fucking semantics.