Nah. There's Fallout 2 and depending on who you ask New Vegas as well. I say 1 is probably the best in my opinion.So there is basically just one ''true'' fallout game and that is 1?
So there is basically just one ''true'' fallout game and that is 1?
How would you know if you haven't even played Fallout 1? You called the Vault Dweller, the name of the player character of Fallout 1, the Lone Wanderer, the player character of Fallout 3.Yes.
Well since the lone wanderer never complete the water chip quest he never recieve the super mutants quest. Therefore he doesnt save the wasteland.
And Fallout 3 improve on a lot of this issues making that a superior Fallout game well a superior game in general right?So there is basically just one ''true'' fallout game and that is 1?
Yes.
Back then, they were limited to a 8bit 256 color palette. I think they did a great job of showing a desolated wasteland "world" while limited to using something similar to this:Fallout 1& 2 both have restoration packs that actually clears it up. They make the games really crisp. My problem is pretty much only with the colors.
it's a PC game released in late 90s with pre-rendered sprites, not a Famicom gameBack then, they were limited to a 8bit 256 color palette. I think they did a great job of showing a desolated wasteland "world" while limited to using something similar to this:Fallout 1& 2 both have restoration packs that actually clears it up. They make the games really crisp. My problem is pretty much only with the colors.
Also worth noting, is that they had to save some of the more pronounced colors for dangerous stuff (so it is easily recognized by the player as a danger), like green goo puddles for example. I really don't know how anyone could expect crisp colors in a 8bit 256 palette.
Nah the serious only has two good game and that is one and 3. Look how 3,perfectly combined the story of fallout one and two story's and adding nearly all of the faction of the past game with a perfect explanation why there thousand kilometers from there place of origin so they don't have to add anything for them self.Nah. There's Fallout 2 and depending on who you ask New Vegas as well. I say 1 is probably the best in my opinion.So there is basically just one ''true'' fallout game and that is 1?
I don't get what you mean by this. Famicon had a 55 color palette:it's a PC game released in late 90s with pre-rendered sprites, not a Famicom game
No. It has to do with what you think is nice art because that is your principle hate towards the game, to which everything else is linked.Yes it is my opinion, any statement anyone makes on the forum is an opinion, and people constantly mentioning it are being redundant. That being said, my metric for whether or not a game has an engaging combat system extends further than being able to shit someone in the dick.
Obvious fake news, since you have been moaning about it almost exclusively.That doesn't justify the game being an absolute eye-sore to look at. I'm not someone that needs triple A graphics to enjoy a game.
Wrong. You can skip the Gecko Cave entirely and still get Sulik. And, as mentioned, Outdoorsman, which you can get to over 100 with putting a single point into it, completely negates random encounters. You haven't really played the game, have you?By pacing, I mean the beginning of the game is an absolute drag, and some of the combat encounters are absolutely fucked. The Gecko cave, which you need to complete if you want Sulik, is so horribly designed; as well as the random encounters generally being annoying as hell later on in the game.
Not according to the 2016 elections. Fucking Hollywood.California =/= Hollywood. It's an entire fucking state boys, albeit a shitty state, but everyone who's from California isn't from Hollywood/associated with it.
Back then, they were limited to a 8bit 256 color palette. I think they did a great job of showing a desolated wasteland "world" while limited to using something similar to this:Fallout 1& 2 both have restoration packs that actually clears it up. They make the games really crisp. My problem is pretty much only with the colors.
Also worth noting, is that they had to save some of the more pronounced colors for dangerous stuff (so it is easily recognized by the player as a danger), like green goo puddles for example. I really don't know how anyone could expect crisp colors in a 8bit 256 palette.
I don't get what you mean by this.it's a PC game released in late 90s with pre-rendered sprites, not a Famicom game
Given the average human, when in doubt, go for the latter.I'm not sure if that's brilliant or retarded logic
I get my facts wrong there, no denying that, but I do know what a "pre-rendered sprites" and a "Famicom" are...I don't get what you mean by this.it's a PC game released in late 90s with pre-rendered sprites, not a Famicom game
It means "I have no clue what I'm talking, but I'll just drop some terms I heard about to sound smart".
There are many examples of games with a 8bit color palette done right, several of them having been posted on a thread about color. And even if this wasn't the case, it wouldn't justify the shit graphics, just explain them.-snip-
No mate. If the art was good, the combat would still be shit. The art being good would go a long ways towards me being able to deal with the shit combat system, but it would still be a major gripe.No. It has to do with what you think is nice art because that is your principle hate towards the game, to which everything else is linked.
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you just misunderstood me again, and are not a retard. There are countless games that I think have great graphics, which are far removed from triple A standards. I prefer most of my games to be in 2D over 3D. I just don't want the art to be shit. Good art has very little to do with the graphical fidelity of a game.Obvious fake news, since you have been moaning about it almost exclusively.
I've openly admitted I've only played 4 hours of Fallout 2 with two builds, quitting after the Den. And I understand I can skip the Gecko Cave, but 1,000 caps is a ridiculous price. As for Outdoorsman, would've been good to know before I started playing. That being said, I'm willing to admit that perhaps I was wrong with the pacing (as now that I think about it, how can I say pacing is shit when I haven't gotten to the end game), I'll take that L. I'll change my claim to the opening couple hours of the game being shit. This is a minute point in comparison to the other two however. And again, other than the shit art direction and combat, the dialogue and world building was actually really fucking boring as well. I was very unimpressed. Perhaps it picks up later in the game, but the beginning is a snooze.Wrong. You can skip the Gecko Cave entirely and still get Sulik. And, as mentioned, Outdoorsman, which you can get to over 100 with putting a single point into it, completely negates random encounters. You haven't really played the game, have you?
This makes your claims completely suspect.
Exactly this, thanks for breaking it down. I knew you were solid the first time I talked to yeh.-snip-