CrunchyHemorrhoids
Prophet
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2010
- Messages
- 1,611
January update brings She-Ra and My Little Pony crossover DLC.
Last edited:
You can turn off scaling with the latest patch.The levelling and scaling here is significantly worse than in Witcher 3 even.I'm having a good time with this time. It had me and my brothers playing it through this christmas. I have some issues with it, like the way it handles the levels of the enemies (Same shit system that The witcher 3 were you have stats reduction against enemies 5 levels above you), some nitpicking about the narrative and the atmosphere of the game... but is good. I really like reading those stone tablets offering you riddles that guides you to treasures.
Far be it from me to complain about post-launch content, especially the free variety, but is there seriously any point in buying these games at launch then? More so than other games out there it seems that ever since Origins waiting and going for Gold version really is the only way.
All they did was make upscaling separate from combat difficulty setting because it was previously broken. The easier difficulty settings would eventually become the hardest as their reduced upscaling also meant you earned several times less XP and ended up severely underleveled compared to those playing on harder difficulties.You can turn off scaling with the latest patch.
All those bullshit about "build your own odyessy, make your choices ","we won't force you into a relationship you don't like", and they force the female protagnist to have a kid with a male NPC she just met for several days.
Bloody hell Ubisoft, I thought you were finally becoming better.
here is the video of the ending of the second part of the DLC, spoiler alert(the title alone is a spoiler) if you give a shit.
Holy shit wow this is fucking pathetic. Apparently mother, Deimos, literally nobody acknowledged this, and you can't choose to avoid hooking up with wimp. So much for building your own Odyssey.here is the video of the ending of the second part of the DLC, spoiler alert(the title alone is a spoiler) if you give a shit.
At this point does it matter. She apparently only played the game for female empowerment, and is now btching cause that was taken away from her.dudes who play as girls having sex with men is gay/isn't gay enough ..? I'm so confused.
**edit** how much you wanna bet that "lesbian" reddit poster is a tranny?
a) Back in 430bc, they were NOT ruined! For fuck sake! The acropolis and Parthenon and all other buildings were NOT RUINS, you idiots! They became ruins after 2.500 years... Yes when you visit them TODAY, they look like this, but back THEN, they were normal buildings... Haven't those idiots at Ubisoft ever watched a representation of how those greek ruins looked like in 500bc? My GOD! I see ruined buildings being used by contemporary people and i am in shock. They never thought that this is looking retarded? It is amazing to me because in previous Creed games the designers got the architectures right, but for some reason for the greek-based Creed they went full-retard.
b) People seem to think that those marbles and ruins were all white, because that is what they look like today, but back then, they were COLORED! It is just that the ruins are so fucking old, that the colors have washed away! Playing Creed is like playing in all-white buildings all the time, yet those buildings didn't look that way 2500 years ago.... THEY WERE COLORED, idiots at Ubisoft... COLORED! New scientific techniques were able to pinpoint the colors even...
The sculptures etc were indeed painted with vibrant colours
These reconstructions look odd to us because they lack shading, subtle variations in color, variations in the boldness of a particular hue, and other important visual elements that we know quite well Classical painters utilized. We get a similar effect when trying to reconstruct wall paintings like those at the Villa of Agrippa Postumus, various paintings at Pompeii, and at the catacombs. We know that these paintings were elegantly shaded and painted with a great deal of skill (and some sculpture, like the Alexander Sarcophagus, appears still to preserve elements of this shading), intended to preserve lifelike qualities as much as possible, but these subtle features do not come out in reconstructions. I remember seeing a reconstruction of parts of one of the colonnades of the Villa of Agrippa Postumus standing next to parts of the colonnade that have been preserved--the difference is quite startling. In the case of statuary we're also missing important elements like the sheen of certain colors (Pliny mentions metallics, for example), the effect of encaustic on pigment, and things like polished beeswax which could be used to make skin more realistic. Indeed, with regards to skin I have yet to see a reconstruction that doesn't just color skin entirely, as if it were just another area that was painted like clothing--skin was generally done by tinting the wax used for encaustic, rather than applying a full color, so that the natural qualities of the marble could act as the base for the effect. Skin tends to preserve poorly--while the Acropolis Korai preserve the pigment of their hair and clothing rather well very few of them show any significant remaining pigment on areas of exposed skin. The New Pauly also notes that with some pigments chemical reactions have altered the colors, a problem we get on some wall paintings too.
I mentioned this not long ago, but these garish reconstructions look that way because they're taking the chemical readings of the pigment and applying an averaged color over the entire surface. We know from our texts that this was almost certainly not how pigment was applied to statuary. Skin, for example, was usually applied by lightly tinting the wax used for encaustic, allowing the marble to show through. It would also be highly polished to look more lifelike, but neither of these qualities is present in most of our reconstructions--instead, since we pick up traces of pigment on bared areas the color is applied to the entire area as a solid color, because we don't know precisely how it would have appeared. Wall paintings, which are generally better preserved and which were often painted by precisely the same artists that applied encaustic to statuary, show great attention to shading and subtle variations in color to create realistic and lifelike qualities. These reconstructions tell us, broadly speaking at least, the colors of the pigments applied, but they don't tell us very much else
How will the story fall apart? Lyla just get the DNA for the protagnist's spear, so that's not a issue anymore.if they never had children then the entire story would fall apart
video game "journalists" are retards