Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Baldur's Gate Baldur's Gate 3 Pre-Release Thread [EARLY ACCESS RELEASED, GO TO NEW THREAD]

octavius

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
19,220
Location
Bjørgvin
Butthurt 3.
You know you will initially be :bounce: , and then you will be :deadhorse: when Larian fails to deliver.
 
Self-Ejected

Harry Easter

Self-Ejected
Joined
Jul 27, 2016
Messages
819
It says 2019 Wizards of the Coast. All rights reserved.

Okay, then it would make a bit more sense. Still weird, after establishing Rivellon finally as its own thing. Oh well, whatever pays the bills. And it will be good or at least try to be awesome.
 

whydoibother

Arcane
Patron
Joined
May 2, 2018
Messages
15,644
Location
bulgaristan
Codex Year of the Donut
I hope they write a fuckhueg furry like Chewbacca, thats secretly carrying a little humanoid gnome in his pocket, giving him advice on what to do, just to see how SEETHING MAD codexers will get.
 

Mortmal

Arcane
Joined
Jun 15, 2009
Messages
9,182
I've repeatedly expressed my skepticism towards Owlcatfags on the 'Dex but the Ruskies would still do a better job with the BG franchise than Larian ever could.
No, the good parts of kingmaker were in the books, the encounters aren't as good as BG2 one still 20 years later , AC bloat is absurd and the last part of the game, the part they really did themselves from scratch is awful. Larian is a lot more professional and their games were playable from start to the end with no noticeable bugs .Owlcat could do better maybe with a real budget and time , right now it doesn't.
 

Bester

⚰️☠️⚱️
Patron
Vatnik
Joined
Sep 28, 2014
Messages
11,102
Location
USSR
giphy.gif
 

whydoibother

Arcane
Patron
Joined
May 2, 2018
Messages
15,644
Location
bulgaristan
Codex Year of the Donut
I've repeatedly expressed my skepticism towards Owlcatfags on the 'Dex but the Ruskies would still do a better job with the BG franchise than Larian ever could.
No, the good parts of kingmaker were in the books, the encounters aren't as good as BG2 one still 20 years later , AC bloat is absurd and the last part of the game, the part they really did themselves from scratch is awful. Larian is a lot more professional and their games were playable from start to the end with no noticeable bugs .Owlcat could do better maybe with a real budget and time , right now it doesn't.

At least the game is polished, runs well, is stable, and there are no bugs.
 

Taurist

Scholar
Joined
Dec 8, 2017
Messages
108
Unless its a fully turn based Co-Op DnD simulator to make Pierre Begue weep for wasting the last 15 years of his life when he could have been making Battle of the Sands II I'm not interested.

I think a storyfag game would be a big mistake for larian actually.
 

Jimmious

Arcane
Patron
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
5,132
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
I've repeatedly expressed my skepticism towards Owlcatfags on the 'Dex but the Ruskies would still do a better job with the BG franchise than Larian ever could.
No, the good parts of kingmaker were in the books, the encounters aren't as good as BG2 one still 20 years later , AC bloat is absurd and the last part of the game, the part they really did themselves from scratch is awful. Larian is a lot more professional and their games were playable from start to the end with no noticeable bugs .Owlcat could do better maybe with a real budget and time , right now it doesn't.

At least the game is polished, runs well, is stable, and there are no bugs.
You mean after some months of bug fixing. D:OS2 was in much better condition on release
 
Unwanted

Elephantman

Unwanted
Joined
Apr 8, 2019
Messages
253
What are the odds, the Gods strip Bhaals essence from you and you start at level 1, with Imoen and Amnesia - up to gathering your old party while venturing forth!

:suicide:
 

Xeon

Augur
Joined
Apr 9, 2013
Messages
1,858
Laidlaw joined Ubisoft I think, no? might be great to see Gaider work on BG3 if related since people praised him for Ascension.
 

Andhaira

Arcane
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
1,868,989
Larian is a passionate studio, who make great games. I was a big fan of Divine Divnity, and still consider it their best game the ONLY worthy heir to Ultima.

The DOS games ( I have played the first part) were great, especially the turnbased combat. Unfortunately, the writing was terrible; so terrible in fact it prevented me from finishing the game despite my love for the TB system.

BG series are games that do depend on good writing, especially BG II, the best one; unfortunately I don't see Larian being able to pull it off and would thus ruin the experience. Especially if they put their horrible, immersion breaking 'jokes' in there coupled with their terrible writing.

Ideally I would like a game with a TB battle system like DOS, powered by the D&D 5e or PF I rules engine (though WOTC will never let them go with Pathfinder for BG) and ALL the writing and quests done by the original BG team, led by David Gaider or someone equally as passionate and competent in that arena. Avellone had nothing to do with the BG series so while I wouldn't be against his involvement, I do believe he is not needed at all for this.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom