Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Elder Scrolls Bethesda does it AGAIN - promotional Elsweyr tabletop adventure is plagiarized from D&D module

Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
1,876,046
Location
Glass Fields, Ruins of Old Iran
Yes, idiot, when they're saying it's not canon, it means it goes against the original established canon. What's so fucking hard to understand? It's not about fucking preference. You have some originally established canon and then you have shit that retcons that. Officially it's still called canon. However, canon means nothing in this case. It's either canon or "anything goes". Can't be both.

If words have no meaning, how come bajaludbdab tudkos numaztericon?
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom