Official Codex Discord Server

  1. Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
    Dismiss Notice

Game News Combat RPG of 2004 Delayed To May 2005

Discussion in 'RPG Codex News & Content Comments' started by Sol Invictus, Apr 16, 2005.

  1. Sol Invictus Erudite

    Sol Invictus
    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2002
    Messages:
    9,614
    Location:
    Pax Romana
    Tags: Dungeon Lords; Heuristic Park Inc.

    Everyone's favorite real-time dungeon romp, <a href=http://www.dungeonlordsgame.com/main.php?s=news>Dungeon Lords</a> has once again been postponed, this time to a mid-May 2005 release date, slipping past its overly enthusiastic April 20 release date.
    <br>
    <blockquote>We would like to announce that the release date of Dungeon Lords has been postponed to mid-May 2005. We apologize for the delay and would inform you of a precise release date shortly.</blockquote>
    <br>
    Hopefully this allow the developers some time to actually finish the game. So, how about fixing that night time lighting?
     
    ^ Top  
  2. Naked_Lunch Erudite

    Naked_Lunch
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    5,360
    Location:
    Norway, 1967
    They've adressed that already.



    They're adding goggles.

    EDIT: LOLOL! SARCASM! :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:
     
    ^ Top  
  3. bgillisp Scholar

    bgillisp
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    248
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    Why not just up the view range? I think that would be easier, and more practical?
     
    ^ Top  
  4. Shagnak Shagadelic

    Shagnak
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2003
    Messages:
    4,628
    Location:
    Arse of the world, New Zealand
    What?
    There is nothing wrong with the "view range".
    At daytime you can see plenty far.

    It's only in the dark parts that you need the goggles :wink:

    (maybe I should add more winks?)
    (maybe Mr Lunch should have added some winks?)
     
    ^ Top  
  5. Saint_Proverbius Arcane Patron

    Saint_Proverbius
    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    11,190
    Location:
    Behind you.
    I'm guessing that the reason you can't see very well at night has everything to do with view range. It'd be rather silly to render all that stuff you can't see.
     
    ^ Top  
  6. Shagnak Shagadelic

    Shagnak
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2003
    Messages:
    4,628
    Location:
    Arse of the world, New Zealand
    Nope, not enough winks. Thought so.
     
    ^ Top  
  7. Naked_Lunch Erudite

    Naked_Lunch
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    5,360
    Location:
    Norway, 1967
    Fixed it. How's that, Shag?
     
    ^ Top  
  8. Shagnak Shagadelic

    Shagnak
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2003
    Messages:
    4,628
    Location:
    Arse of the world, New Zealand
    :lol:

    Much better!
     
    ^ Top  
  9. Deathboy Liturgist

    Deathboy
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2005
    Messages:
    363
    Location:
    Aotearoa
    I think I read somewhere you can now sleep all night at campsites so you don't have to trundle round all night blind. I think I also read somewhere you could get googles......
     
    ^ Top  
  10. Shagnak Shagadelic

    Shagnak
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2003
    Messages:
    4,628
    Location:
    Arse of the world, New Zealand
    Googles?
    Nah bro, dats on dis fing cawlled da interweb or sumtink :shock:

    Yup.
    That's one of the improvements they say they've made.
    Yaaaaay!
     
    ^ Top  
  11. Sol Invictus Erudite

    Sol Invictus
    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2002
    Messages:
    9,614
    Location:
    Pax Romana
    This game is gonna be game equivilent of a stank ass bitch who tries to sell herself on the street for two bucks a pop, and you know it. I'll take the high class escort (Guild Wars), thanks.
     
    ^ Top  
  12. Shagnak Shagadelic

    Shagnak
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2003
    Messages:
    4,628
    Location:
    Arse of the world, New Zealand
    Errrrmmmm...okay :shock:
    I think your analogy fits better with the shite that the likes of Silver Style churn out. And I think this game is going to be a lot better than The Fall. Or Gorasul.

    Talking of whores aside, even if it turns out to be the slightest bit decent, I think the damage is already done.

    Incidentally, are there any downloadable video segments for Guild Wars that do not make the gameplay look like complete shit? I'm hearing great stuff about it and all, but the footage I've seen so far isn't doing the word-of-mouth/previews any justice!*

    Edit: BTW, I think it's "skank-ass bitch" :wink:
    Edit2: * All the video I have seen so far are some (admittedly glorious looking) panning shots of scenery, and lots of repetitive albeit flashy looking fighting. Characters flailing away at each other again and again, that sort of thing. As advertising, they fail to make it look better than a typical mmorpg (yes, I know it is not an mmorpg, its just the footage is bad at conveying that).
     
    ^ Top  
  13. bgillisp Scholar

    bgillisp
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    248
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    I did mean viewing range at night, thanks Saint.

    While the corrections to work around this are nice (goggles and resting to day), I still think it should just not be implemented as it is. One simple change in implementation = no need to progrem these other items. Seriously, how blind does he think we are at night anyways? Or, does everyone in his fantasy world just have poor eyesight?
     
    ^ Top  
  14. PennyAnte Liturgist

    PennyAnte
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Messages:
    769
    Location:
    Here instead of playing an RPG.
    As it is, the game looks better through old-school 3-D glasses. I don't see how anything saves it.
     
    ^ Top  
  15. Shagnak Shagadelic

    Shagnak
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2003
    Messages:
    4,628
    Location:
    Arse of the world, New Zealand
    Fucking hell, bgsillip.
    Did we need to ad more smilies and winks for you?
    No fucking goggles, K? Keerrist! :roll:

    However the current list of fnished fixes includes:
    -Camping Implemented! Players can camp out at campsite to rest, refilling magic spells, healing, and passing time of day.
    -Gamma fixed

    And other things that annoyed me that are fixed:
    -Screen resolutions work correctly
    -Compass Implemented
    -Climbing (especially out of the water) has been fixed! (yay)

    All at this thread:
    http://www.dreamcatchergames.com/forums ... hp?t=20438
     
    ^ Top  
  16. Fez Erudite

    Fez
    Joined:
    May 18, 2004
    Messages:
    7,954
    Now you know why you need moron indicators in dialogue.
     
    ^ Top  
  17. bgillisp Scholar

    bgillisp
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    248
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    I got it now, thanks. Guess one should not read a message board half-awake :), jokes tend to be missed.

    Then again, it is D.W Bradely, the same guy who put shapeships and guns into Wizardy. So, goggles did not seem as far fetched as you thought. At least to someone reading a post on little to no sleep.
     
    ^ Top  
  18. bgillisp Scholar

    bgillisp
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    248
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    Oh, and Fez, moron indicators do help when one is on little to no sleep. I really can't wait for the semester to end so I can sleep more...or play games more, probably the later actually.
     
    ^ Top  
  19. Deathboy Liturgist

    Deathboy
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2005
    Messages:
    363
    Location:
    Aotearoa
    Hay Ex you forgot to include "winks" some people round here might not think your being sarcastic I fact some people maybe foolish enough to think you actually like guild wars
     
    ^ Top  
  20. theverybigslayer Liturgist

    theverybigslayer
    Joined:
    May 25, 2004
    Messages:
    985
    Location:
    Port Hope
    :oops: I was foolish enough to think that :oops:
    I wondered why Exitium likes that crappy shitty mmorpg?
     
    ^ Top  
  21. bgillisp Scholar

    bgillisp
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    248
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    Maybe because it does not have a monthly fee? I personally hate paying $49.99 or so for a game, then $15 mothly to keep playing.

    Oh, I got much more sleep last night, so should be better :oops:
     
    ^ Top  
  22. Vykromond Scholar

    Vykromond
    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2005
    Messages:
    341
    You called it an MMORPG just to get Exitium to respond to your flame, didn't you?
     
    ^ Top  
  23. bgillisp Scholar

    bgillisp
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    248
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    Where is Exitium anyways? I am surprised he has not responded yet on this thread.
     
    ^ Top  
  24. theverybigslayer Liturgist

    theverybigslayer
    Joined:
    May 25, 2004
    Messages:
    985
    Location:
    Port Hope
    No, I did not. First of all, I am very afraid of Exitium's respond.
    And Guild Wars is not an mmorpg... :oops: What is it then?
     
    ^ Top  
  25. MrBrown Liturgist

    MrBrown
    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2002
    Messages:
    176
    Location:
    Helsinki, Finland
    This game can't be bad. It's got ninjas.
     
    ^ Top  

(buying stuff via the above buttons helps us pay the hosting bills, thanks!)