I don't want to be partially responsible for helping them meet their goal but at the same time I'm not going to pass getting it for half-price when it does. It's passive aggressive brilliance.Wait...what? Why? Your donation doesn't get charged unless they reach their funding goal anyway...Gonna donate once it meets its funding goal, win-win for everyone.
Do people really pledge higher to get more rewards? I thought it's first and foremost about wanting to support the game, with the rewards being a nice "thank you" extra.
Didn't Shadowrun have the higher tier donaters vote to just give the DLC to everyone instead? I know it got some bad PR when they first announced it.
...*reads marsal's post*
Shit. Is there a combat video or demo of sorts?! I'm kinda worried it'll turn out like AoD. I didn't like that one at all.
If you're genuinely worried, don't stress too much. I assume you didn't appreciate the way combat was balanced, the encounter design and lack of togglable skills in AOD. Dead State will likely have different design in a lot of those areas. So if you dislike the combat it will probably be for different reasons.
Just go back to your princess undressing game you coward!...*reads marsal's post*
Shit. Is there a combat video or demo of sorts?! I'm kinda worried it'll turn out like AoD. I didn't like that one at all.
If you're genuinely worried, don't stress too much. I assume you didn't appreciate the way combat was balanced, the encounter design and lack of togglable skills in AOD. Dead State will likely have different design in a lot of those areas. So if you dislike the combat it will probably be for different reasons.
I cautiously withdrew my pledge, I like the idea - and spread it around. But the combat doesn't convince me. It's all I'll ever do with the zombies anyway.
Why not?They really shouldn't.They also should support Kicking It forward.
And with this I'm backing 14 projects. Enough with all the promising incline already!