Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

Game News Fallen Gods Update #2: Days of Yore

Infinitron

I post news
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
97,228
Codex Year of the Donut Serpent in the Staglands Dead State Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Shadorwun: Hong Kong Divinity: Original Sin 2 A Beautifully Desolate Campaign Pillars of Eternity 2: Deadfire Pathfinder: Kingmaker Pathfinder: Wrath I'm very into cock and ball torture I helped put crap in Monomyth
Tags: Fallen Gods; Mark Yohalem; Wormwood Studios

This week's development update for Fallen Gods, the upcoming Norse-flavored roguelite from Mark Yohalem, is entitled "Days of Yore". Contrary to what some may have thought, it's not about the history of the game world, but rather about the history of the project itself. Mark has been looking to make a computer game based on Barbarian Prince and Lone Wolf for a very long time, long before Primordia. Inspired by the 2005 space roguelike Weird Worlds, it was originally going to be a science fiction game called Star Captain, an idea that was set aside due to the success of FTL and Mass Effect. You can read the whole story of Fallen Gods' conception here, but first a sample of music from the game's composer:



Your fire’s gleam seems to dim in this great room, swallowed by shadows that swim and loom like whales in the dark sea. Blacker than light’s lack, the hall must hold some lost, last scrap of the unmade world. Bats flap through this false night on leather wings, their shrill songs ringing softly off the far stone walls. It is an uncanny cleft, one which waits with unwelcome dread.

I’m old enough that when I was very young, we had no computer at all. And the computer we did get, when I was around six or seven, was an Apple IIc that plugged into a black and white television. This gift came from my grandfather, a NASA engineer who rightly anticipated that facility with computers would be essential for my generation, and using this machine he taught me basic (literally, BASIC) programming. Essential or not, it wasn’t much for gaming, and even when my brother and I pooled our allowances, we never managed to get our hands on much more than a two-sided floppy with David’s Midnight Magic and Choplifter. The formative games of my childhood were thus not computer games but board games, video games, “narration games” (rule-free RPGs in which whining and punching replaced rolling dice and tracking stats), and gamebooks.

There are two games from that era that loom large not just in my memory but in the design of Fallen Gods: Arnold Hendrick’s single-player RPG board game entitled Barbarian Prince (Dwarfstar, 1981) and Joe Dever’s Lone Wolf gamebooks (1984 and onward). Arnold Hendrick is a name any RPG fan should know because he was the genius, the seemingly mad and insatiable genius, behind MicroProse’s Darklands. His earlier work shows the same genius. And Joe Dever has rightly ascended into, if not the pantheon of renowned game designers, at least the ranks of “designers with longform Wikipedia entries.” His recent untimely death at 60 robbed the world of a generous spirit and a tireless pen.

Barbarian Prince contains many of things that computer RPGs would take years to include: a vivid setting with open exploration; many towns, castles, ruins, and other locations of interest to visit; multiple victory paths to discover; engaging encounters with different resolutions; gear, mounts, relics, followers, and resources to manage. Its core conceit is not far from that of Fallen Gods. The eponymous Barbarian Prince has been ousted from his throne and must regain it within 70 days or else live forever in exile. During that time, he must gather strength, wealth, and followers and typically something special (a particular relic, the favor of a particular patron, etc.) in order to overcome the usurper back home. While Barbarian Prince is now (was always?) too complex to play easily as a board game, that’s because the “computer’s” job in a cRPG (tracking stats and enforcing rules and so forth) is foisted upon the player alongside his normal job (digesting information and making decisions). In a hypothetical scenario where the player could be freed from such extra obligations, Barbarian Prince’s visionary design reveals that a rich, strategic RPG can emerge from what are, actually, pretty simple rules.

Despite its embarrassment of riches, or maybe because of it, Barbarian Prince lacks the “flavor” that a DM or cRPG designer brings to an RPG. It has almost 200 events, but each is extraordinarily thin, barely more than an encounter chart in an early P&P RPG. For instance, “e164 Giant Lizard” provides, in inelegant sum total: “A huge, giant lizard that shakes the earth as it walks attacks you. It is combat skill 10, endurance 12, but you strike first in combat (r220). Escape is only possible if you have mounts, those without cannot escape.” That’s it.

There is no such shortcoming, if it is a shortcoming, in Lone Wolf. Those gamebooks—by which I mean “choose-your-own-adventure books with RPG statistics”—also reveal a design genius, but a very different kind of genius. The long series tells a sprawling epic in a vividly described world with unique cultures, creeds, and creatures. Scenes are brought to life by Dever’s clear prose and use of familiar fantasy tropes. The story begins thusly: “You must make haste for you sense it is not safe to linger by the smoking remains of the ruined monastery. The black-winged beasts could return at any moment.”

In counterpoint to its more complex storytelling, Lone Wolf offers much simpler rules than those of Barbarian Prince. Because of this simplicity, everything the game asks of you feels significant, down to each ration of food. Every skill you can choose sounds appealing, and the inability to take them all is heartbreaking. That longing grows stronger as you play because the skills you do have—esoteric abilities like “Animal Kinship” and “Mind Over Matter” and more workaday knacks like “Hunting” and “Camouflage”—offer such rewarding possibilities. Likewise, finding magical items or superior gear feels as exciting as discovering a new item in Zelda or a new weapon in Metroid, rather than being the kind of dull, incremental upgrade now ubiquitous in cRPGs.

These two masterworks from master craftsmen returned to my mind around 2006 when I played a modest but excellent “coffee break” procedural space game called Weird Worlds(Digital Eel, 2005). It struck me then that the simple framework of my childhood favorites could be combined with procedural generation because Barbarian Prince’s rules would work just as well in a procedural setting as in a fixed one. Indeed, Barbarian Prince’s events already occurred with a great deal of randomness; only the map was fixed. And Lone Wolf’s prose adventures, in vignette form, could replace the thin events of Barbarian Prince. For a variety of reasons, a space opera seemed the right setting for this, and for many years I worked on Star Captain, a project that would blend the three games into one. A series of setbacks and distractions (including the very fine distraction of Primordia) delayed the project, and by the time I got back to it in early 2013, it had largely been preempted in gameplay by FTL and in setting by Mass Effect.

Fortunately, just a year earlier I had read The Long Ships. The novel had rekindled my love of Norse mythology and Viking adventurers and of Iceland itself, which I had visited in 2003 as part of my dad’s vain 60th-birthday attempt to see the aurora borealis. The Long Ships led me to Heimskringla, Snorri Sturluson’s account of the old Norse kings. AndHeimskringla led me to Snorri’s Prose Edda which led me to the elder Poetic Edda, and thence to Kevin Crossley-Holland’s The Norse Myths. And from these, I began to browse my way through the enormous, majestic body of Icelandic sagas as well as many collections of Norse myth and Scandinavian folklore.

It became clear that from these pieces I could build the setting to house my game idea—a sort of homecoming, since Barbarian Prince itself is about a great warrior from the North. To round things out, I read through other sagas and sources from farther abroad: the IrishTáin Bó Cúailnge; the Anglo-Saxon Beowulf (Seamus Heaney’s amazing translation); the Finnish Kalevala; and the Anglo-Saxon poetry in The Exeter Book (introduced to me by the project’s Polish linguist-editor-scripter-factotum, Maciej Bogucki) to try to get closer to how our language was used in telling those sorts of stories. I don’t have a scholar’s memory or a poet’s craft, but from these I started to feel some of what C.S. Lewis called “Northernness,” and to trace the deep folkloric roots of the modern fantasy genre that J.R.R. Tolkien brought into flower.

With all that, I consigned Star Captain to the dark abyss in the sky, and set sail for the lands of Fallen Gods. I will leave you with this piece by our wonderful composer, Anders Hedenholm, fittingly hailing from Uppsala, Sweden, once home to the greatest Norse temple complex.
Although it doesn't sound like it, the next Fallen Gods update will be about the game's lore. However, Mark has decided to switch to a monthly update schedule, so you'll have to wait a while for it.
 

puppyonastik

Augur
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
175
Location
Northern Illinois
MRY , Please reconsider revisiting the Star Captain game at a later date. Every time you've shown those screenshots (the art is beautiful), and spoken about it, I'm always hooked. I can't get enough of the Escape Velocity: Nova-types. And the idea of a variation that has more depth in general as well as the C&C department, not to mention your writing, is really alluring. I'm currently bouncing between Endless Sky (free), Star Traders: Frontiers (highly recommended), and Starsector (http://fractalsoftworks.com/). I know it seems like a full market, but I think you'll do a stand-out job, as the competition's features only go knee deep. Anyways, that's my thoughts.
 

MRY

Wormwood Studios
Developer
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
5,703
Location
California
Yep. It is on my bucket list. You have no idea how many bad space operas I suffered through to learn the genre at the level I thought necessary.

EDIT: You would be in pain too if you had read multiple catman space operas!
 
Last edited:

Galdred

Studio Draconis
Patron
Developer
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
4,346
Location
Middle Empire
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
Lone Wolf was my first introduction to character leveling up, and carrying over between adventures. Joe Dever really managed to make each power feel distinct, and important in his book.

Sorcery! also made very good use of powers and item based decisions IMO.

Regarding gamebooks, did you play Fabled Lands, or BloodSword?
Both migh have been too ambitious for their own good, but they did try to push the border further, Fabled Lands by being an open world gamebook series:
Fabled Lands was basically Morrowind in game book form, letting you visit the places you wanted in the order you wanted.
BloodSword added tactical combat maps and rules to gover the opponent AI, and gave you a party of four.

But they also both showed that Computer did both of these things (open world RPG and tactical combat) a lot better.

Both Lone Wolf and Sorcery iOS/Steam adaptations tried to expand the combat to get away from the original roll and pray system.

Joe Dever's Lone Wolf added an action based combat. I think the action combatdid not really fit the genre, and really broke the flow (and made it inconvenient to play as a gamebook, as tapping like mad requires more space and concentration than what is required when reading the COYA parts).
Sorcery added an interesting system where you had to bid energy points to damage your opponent. It was mostly a Yomi system(a distant cousin of Rock Paper Scissor), but even against the AI, it added some interesting decisions to the combat, at the cost of longer fights.


Will the game be entirely COYA driven like KODP, or will it feature additional gameplay challenges ?
 

MRY

Wormwood Studios
Developer
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
5,703
Location
California
Regarding gamebooks, did you play Fabled Lands, or BloodSword?
Nope. For whatever reason, I didn't play any other than Lone Wolf and the original Dungeons and Dragons solo adventure (with the cleric who gets killed by the magic missile that looks like an arrow). I did read CYOA books.

Both Lone Wolf and Sorcery iOS/Steam adaptations tried to expand the combat to get away from the original roll and pray system.
Hopefully we've avoided that as well. And with luck, we'll be able to offer something more robust that its current iteration.

Will the game be entirely COYA driven like KODP, or will it feature additional gameplay challenges ?
Well, KODP has a strategy layer, and so does FG, but the strategy layers are very dissimilar. KODP's is about simulation-style endless gameplay, whereas FG is about trying to achieve specific goals toward which you are making direct progress. It's easier to lose FG, and the games are probably going to be somewhat shorter.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom