Official Codex Discord Server

  1. Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.
    Dismiss Notice

Good Turn-Based War Simulations

Discussion in 'Strategy and Simulation' started by dagorkan, Jun 7, 2008.

  1. dagorkan Arbiter

    dagorkan
    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2006
    Messages:
    5,164
    So I've become tired and sick of these sub-par Paradox games, I'm looking for something more realistic and complex than Risk! but which is fun, challenging and has good AI. I don't want too much economic/resource management and I don't care so much about the setting, anything historical since the 18th century would be fine.

    I've seen quite a lot of hex-based games reviewed on TCancer, one by Hussar Games about the American Revolution looked quite intriguing... I own and played SSI's Fantasy/Star Generals and liked them but something a little more high scale, historical and open-ended (rather than mission based) would be preferable. But I don't want an overly ambitious sandbox 'control the world' thing that only ends up disappointing because the gameplay isn't there to match the ambition (Paradox). Something theater specific where you have a set number of troops would be perfect.

    I also played a lot of "Fields of Glory" a Napoleonic real-time game back in the day (even used it's database to write a history essay in school) and bought Cossacks a while ago but for some reason never installed it and lost the DVD. My preference is turn based but I can tolerate manageable real time.

    What would you recommend to try first?
     
    ^ Top  
  2. Caveman Scholar

    Caveman
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2008
    Messages:
    518
    Location:
    Cave, dark deep cave
    ^ Top  
  3. dagorkan Arbiter

    dagorkan
    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2006
    Messages:
    5,164
    Thanks, with this it looks like I will be set for life!

    The mailed box + download is cheaper than what HoI cost me with a shitty download-only option.
     
    ^ Top  
  4. Jason chasing a bee

    Jason
    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2005
    Messages:
    10,682
    Location:
    baby arm fantasy island
    Sounds like you want operational-level wargames.

    SC2 is solid if you want something Risk-ish that's easy to get into. But Caveman's suggestion for TOAW3 is probably more spot on. It's very flexible with over ten million billion scenarios so you're bound to find something you like.

    Matrix also publishes games for SSG who do very well in the operational department. And check out HPS for their Modern Campaigns and Panzer Campaigns titles.
     
    ^ Top  
  5. Burning Bridges Enviado de meu SM-G3502T usando Tapatalk

    Burning Bridges
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    23,206
    Location:
    Tampon Bay
    ^ Top  
  6. traemyn Novice

    traemyn
    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Messages:
    3
    ^ Top  
  7. Korgan Arbiter

    Korgan
    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2008
    Messages:
    4,238
    Location:
    Fahrfromjuden
    WinSPMBT is pretty good and free to download. Everyone who thinks Paradox's games are dumb should try this.
     
    ^ Top  
  8. Burning Bridges Enviado de meu SM-G3502T usando Tapatalk

    Burning Bridges
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    23,206
    Location:
    Tampon Bay
    Thanks never heard of that game before.

    Why?
     
    ^ Top  
  9. Korgan Arbiter

    Korgan
    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2008
    Messages:
    4,238
    Location:
    Fahrfromjuden
    Cause it's OMG HARDCORE, obviously (but still playable). I doubt wargames get much more serious and realistic than this, really.
     
    ^ Top  
  10. Burning Bridges Enviado de meu SM-G3502T usando Tapatalk

    Burning Bridges
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    23,206
    Location:
    Tampon Bay
    ^ Top  
  11. Erzherzog Magister

    Erzherzog
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,887
    Location:
    Mid-Atlantic
    :cry:
     
    ^ Top  
  12. Armacalypse Scholar

    Armacalypse
    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2008
    Messages:
    541
    I don't get how you could ever make a turn-based game realistic. Those games may not necessarily be unrealistic when it comes to number of options, "stats" or physics, but you can't really call a game realistic when they use completely different meta physics than the real world.
    Don't get me wrong; turn-based is really fun. But the only way to make a realistic game is to make it in real-time, with added elements like pausing and fast-forward to make it playable.

    With that said, are there any war simulators out there that are really realistic?
     
    ^ Top  
  13. Korgan Arbiter

    Korgan
    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2008
    Messages:
    4,238
    Location:
    Fahrfromjuden
    Combat Mission, probably.
     
    ^ Top  
  14. Burning Bridges Enviado de meu SM-G3502T usando Tapatalk

    Burning Bridges
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    23,206
    Location:
    Tampon Bay
    Yeah baby *poof poof*

    [​IMG]
     
    ^ Top  
  15. Troll Scholar

    Troll
    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2007
    Messages:
    105
    Actually from a certain level above real-life combat IS turn based. A general issues his orders and it takes a bit of time for them to be carried out. the enemy general also gives his orders and takes counter-actions if needed and so on. Wether it's same time turn based when you follow your own objectives or sequential time for counter measurements it still remains turn based. The war game gets real time only at squad level
     
    ^ Top  
  16. Astromarine Erudite

    Astromarine
    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    2,213
    Location:
    Switzerland
    which is the really really neat concept at the heart of the Airborne Assault series. It's real-time, pausable, but depending on how high up the chain of command your order was given there's delay, interpretation of orders, etc put in so that you really feel like the commander on the ground. How well this is executed is debatable (I like the series, but I'm nowhere near hardcore enough to be able to play it) but the concept itself is genious.
     
    ^ Top  
  17. Armacalypse Scholar

    Armacalypse
    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2008
    Messages:
    541
    Yeah, orders can be "turn based". But if the whole world is turn based, it changes the way time, and therefore the whole world, works.
    For example, in a turn-based tactical squad game like X-Com or Jagged Alliance the concept of crashing into someone because you both go through a doorway at the same time doesn't work. It also allows a character to execute long attacks without allowing the opponent to react to them, unless the developer has implemented something to balance this, which in turn probably makes the game more unrealistic.

    But turn-based games are still fun unless you are specifically looking for a realistic game. I'm playing Silent Storm right now and it's real fun even though the turn-system prevents the battles from making much sense if you compare it to real combat.
     
    ^ Top  
  18. Burning Bridges Enviado de meu SM-G3502T usando Tapatalk

    Burning Bridges
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    23,206
    Location:
    Tampon Bay
    I generally prefer strategic level to be turn based, tactical battles in real time. Shogun Total War was perfect in every respect, pity they sacrificed detail for scope with the sequels.

    Just to bring back those memories:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    ^ Top  
  19. buccaroobonzai Scholar

    buccaroobonzai
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    241
    Not to go off topic too much...But the Total War series I hope is a precedent for many more wargames, in that they will combine strategic and tactical, as well as turn based and real time. But they should use it in many more tactical to strategic scopes then only in what scale Total war uses.

    Also, a question if anyone knows Medeival Total War. In Rome Ttoal War, on the rela time battlefield you can rotate you're troops facing with a key. We have not been able to find any way to rotate you're troops in Medeival Total War on the real time battlefield, anyone know how to do this?
     
    ^ Top  
  20. Burning Bridges Enviado de meu SM-G3502T usando Tapatalk

    Burning Bridges
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    23,206
    Location:
    Tampon Bay
    Too bad they started to become a succesful company only after the dumbing down began. STW with it's detailed, focussed campaign and 4 tpy was extremely engaging, MTW was dissappointing, and today the TW games are completely generic.
     
    ^ Top  
  21. Burning Bridges Enviado de meu SM-G3502T usando Tapatalk

    Burning Bridges
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    23,206
    Location:
    Tampon Bay
    I can't remember I think in STW I simply ordered them a few steps in the other direction.
     
    ^ Top  
  22. Fez Erudite

    Fez
    Joined:
    May 18, 2004
    Messages:
    7,954
    The Total War games have been heading downhill since that glorious beginning. Medieval Total war + VI expansion was pretty sweet though. Playing the Viking map reminded me of Shogun.
     
    ^ Top  
  23. LCJr. Erudite

    LCJr.
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2003
    Messages:
    2,469
    In Shogun you could select a unit then click and drag. Gave you a ghost image of the unit that let you change facing and width/depth.

    Actually it was downhill starting with Shogun and the Warlord Edition/Mongol Invasions. Geisha's, Kensai's and Battlefield Ninja's gave a clear indication of the gimmicky crap that was to follow.
     
    ^ Top  
  24. JarlFrank I like Thief THIS much Patron

    JarlFrank
    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2007
    Messages:
    24,856
    Location:
    Secret Lab of the Warrior-Magus of Esoteric RPGism
    Yeah, those gimmicky "fantasy units" are one of the worst pieces of crap in the newer TW games. They really stretched it with Rome. Burning pigs? Roman ninja-priests? Gladiators as regular units on the battlefields? Screaming women who scare the enemy? War-dogs? What?

    And the AI became more and more sucky with each new game, too. Luckily some mods for Medieval 2 partly fix that, but it's still nowhere as challenging as Shogun was. I'm really interested in how Empire TW will turn out, though. With a new engine, new campaign map mechanics and really different tactics for a different era it's going to be interesting.
     
    ^ Top  
  25. Burning Bridges Enviado de meu SM-G3502T usando Tapatalk

    Burning Bridges
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    23,206
    Location:
    Tampon Bay
    Too bad I cannot get back to STW either. The 2D art and menus are still great, but I cannot get a kick out of the 3D battles anymore, the problem is the units look ridiculously outdated today. Otherwise I would still play it today.
     
    ^ Top  

(buying stuff via the above buttons helps us pay the hosting bills, thanks!)