[LP CYOA] 傳

Do you expect to gain a permanent boost from a temporary drain?

 

Nevill, I was talking to Esquilax. When I said "we," I was referring to me and Esquilax. Have a quote:

 

B for me, but yeah I think they didn't intend anybody to win this traditional way.

 

Kayerts, I am mostly expecting a boost to our leeching skill, not our neigong. Anyway, we're waiting on treave to make a call on this point.

 

Well, the list of things Shaolin would want to have a word with us about is growing.

You already will have to explain why the Holy Maiden travels with you, then you'll have to comment on where you've got your qi leeching skills, and finally I assume you want to be able to use WQS on the Abbott with all the qi you've leeched. That is going to be one long talk, and I would not be so sure about it's outcome.

 

I doubt it. That fire nuked our neigong cap from 15 to 10. Ahura was destroyed by it. The Amesha Spenta were having a terrible time controlling the flame with a special technique meant to do exactly that. And we could still have absorbed ALL of it before exploding. By comparison nine elders should be quite doable, even if it is pushing our limits a bit. But that's how we grow from the experience.

Moreover, with B, we still have to fight a 1v9 challenge using their own techniques. Even though I'm sure we'll beat the elders this way, it's still going to cost us, and I would have doubts about facing the abbot who is even stronger after we expend strength getting past the 9 elders. On the other hand, if we do C, we will face the abbot in the best condition possible. I think that is what we need.

...And we'll talk about them? As an honorary member they would respect our words. And hiding our ability to absorb qi is a ridiculous thought. The effects are already noticeable, so they will ask us about it anyway.

 

The whole reason it becomes noticeable and recognizable is because you make it the focus of your strategy.

But I am not about to walk into discussing techniques. Just no.

 

Nevill, remember when we voted for the leeching boost? When we asked treave about it, he said:

 

*sigh*

If you make it your main strategy, that's how they notice - because you don't usually get weaker if the other person grips you and does not harm you otherwise.

If you battle them as you normally do, it is not very noticeable - compared to, say, Shouwang Claws to the head.

Ask treave for confirmation on this, because it is so obvious I don't even want to argue that point.

 

Right, so against master-level neigong when we give them a decent leeching they shouldn't notice their neigong vanishing because neigong masters just happen to leak qi all the time. Well, lets ask treave: Could you make a ruling on whether or not they would notice us leeching their qi in B?

And if we don't leech their qi in B, Nevill, then B is a lost cause because there is no way we will handle the abbot in an exhausted condition like that. The nine elders are strong enough to make Yunzi think twice in her regular state. The abbot is even stronger and more skilled. Heck, I have my doubts about succeeding with B even using leeching because the abbot is that fucking strong and we will still enter that fight worn out and unable to copy the abbot's moves.

 

The question is if we want to steamroll and get stunted relations with the monks - and we would come out of it better if we wouldn't even start this then, or if we want to semisteamroll and get a relations boost.

 

Aw shit, Kayerts, you got me there. I am probably just butthurt that we decided to go with dorky puzzle-solving rather than going through the trial with Yunzi. Shamefur dispray. In my defense, I made those statements while I was still on A.

Okay, those are some good arguments, Absinthe, and it seems to me that, without Yunzi, C is the most obvious path to victory here. We use the qi-leeching on the elders, then hopefully we'll have enough inner strength to mimic the Abbot's own techniques. However, I think there's an angle you're not considering with B:

With nine Shaolin elders attacking us all at once while we use Wuxiang Qiankun, we'll pretty much download the entire Shaolin curriculum instantly. We won't need to copy the Abbot's moves, because we'll probably get every single move from Shaolin Temple for the next brief while in the battle against the elders. The knowledge of these skills will remain with us for a couple of hours, which is more than enough time to take on the Abbot.

 

A - Possibility to impress the Abbot to not fight a full battle, just like with Xuxian ("defeat this one technique..."). Keeps our techniques hidden but can screw the fight against the Abbot if he is not impressed. Highest respects from Shaolin if successful.
B - Not an instawin, but can really impress the Shaolin if we show we can control one of the legendary techniques.
C - Feels like an instawin button. But it is the challenge we win, not the hearts and minds of the monks. Still, earns us some respect and a title.

A, but I don't mind if any of the others win.

 

You know Akkudakku, when treave says they would "mildly disapprove" I think "stunted relations" is really an exaggeration. Treave, could you weigh in on this ridiculous rep debate?

Esquilax, I know we'd keep their techniques to use against the abbot. That's the only reason we'd even have a fighting chance. But I think we have to remember that the abbot is stronger than the nine elders to begin with, so I don't think "partial strength Jing + nine elder techniques" is going to win against him. On the other hand, "boosted strength Jing + Abbot techniques" does look like a sure win to me.

 

Gee, I wonder.

 

Nevill, if we don't use chaos mode at all, we aren't going to recover enough strength for the abbot, so that's a loss. And at rank 1, we were unable to maintain order mode the entire time, so I don't know how rank 2 will fare. But treave can answer this.

 

Can we copy those techniques now with B, and then use those techniques against the Abbot while in chaotic state and while qi-draining? That would be very likely a winning strategy.

 

I was all set on B, but then Absinthe made one excellent point: given the Abbott's stance on Xuxian's forbidden skill, what is he going to think once Jing demonstrates another forbidden skill? It I am sure is going to be more offensive than C. I think any argument for B has to take that into account, there's no way they will be happy to see B, one is a LEGENDARY FORBIDDEN TEKUNIKKU, another is a kind of cheesy trick.

In that sense, C for now, because I do think A will blow our load before the Abbott. It's not great for the crowd, but it would get us into a very nice showdown with the Abbott where we can finally show our ZJ skills.

 

As far as I understand, copying the techniques rely on Wuxiang Qiankun, and you can only use it in an orderly state. Once your qi dissolves into chaos, so does your 'knowledge' of the techniques, because you don't really learn them.

I guess this is where learning techs instantly with lvl4 of WQS could help.

Tigranes, that's funny, because just a few updates ago...

 

C

 

Nevill, Xuxian's challenge had specific terms for proving you can use the technique safely in accordance with Shaolin principles. Jing's challenge doesn't have the same restrictions applied, so we can't say it would prove his responsibility the same way.

But I do agree that using Wuxiang Qiankun should be permissible, as treave said:

My biggest concern is that we need to be at our best strength to defeat the abbot. Unlike Xuxian's challenge we have to outright defeat this powerful abbot so I think we need the powerup that C offers.

 

Or we could use the absorb option on the abbot...

 

The abbot doesn't strike me as the kind of guy who will indulge our games. If we reach that final stage, he will just try to defeat us on the spot.

 

So you think 9 other wise old men will get into it and the abbot wont?

 

I find it depressing that the discuss has shifted towards choosing between leeching from the Abbott after we expend our energy with WQS, and copying his moves after we leech from 9 old men.

No one seems to value a good honest fight anymore.

Tally (open) Tally (close)

asxetos B
Baltika9 B
Kz3r0 B
Esquilax B>A
Elfberserker A
Smashing Axe C>B
Fangshi B
XenomorphII B
Nevill A
profreshinal B
tropic B
Ifeex B>A
Kashmir Slippers A
Rex Feral A>C
ChumBucket B
ERYFKRAD A
Absinthe C
Akkudakku B>C
Jester C>A
GreyViper B
TOME A
Tigranes C
archaen C

A - 6 (7)
B - 12 (13)
C - 5 (3)