Parsers have existed since times immemorial.Smartassing. Until we get a cognitive AI the multiple choice dialogues are a tech limitation closest to IRL open ended dialogue.FTFYSeriously, which DM would you choose - one that forces to resolve every confrontation through violence, or the one that prefers multiple-choice quizzes?
And the answer is neither.
Which is of course an inherent flaw of the parsers and not a technological limitation of times immemorial. And which is still closer to a "natural" conversation than multiple-choice quizzes.Parsers have existed since times immemorial.Smartassing. Until we get a cognitive AI the multiple choice dialogues are a tech limitation closest to IRL open ended dialogue.FTFYSeriously, which DM would you choose - one that forces to resolve every confrontation through violence, or the one that prefers multiple-choice quizzes?
And the answer is neither.
And only allowed for a pretty basic conversation, with players asking and receicing simple information.
This is literally the reason why since times immemorial Weizenbaum's Eliza didn't pass the Turing test. Inability to comprehend more than keywords.Which is of course an inherent flaw of the parsers and not a technological limitation of times immemorial. And which is still closer to a "natural" conversation than multiple-choice quizzes.Parsers have existed since times immemorial.Smartassing. Until we get a cognitive AI the multiple choice dialogues are a tech limitation closest to IRL open ended dialogue.FTFYSeriously, which DM would you choose - one that forces to resolve every confrontation through violence, or the one that prefers multiple-choice quizzes?
And the answer is neither.
And only allowed for a pretty basic conversation, with players asking and receicing simple information.
Oh yes. And CYOA books apparently pass it with flying colors.This is literally the reason why since times immemorial Weizenbaum's Eliza didn't pass the Turing test. Inability to comprehend more than keywords.Which is of course an inherent flaw of the parsers and not a technological limitation of times immemorial. And which is still closer to a "natural" conversation than multiple-choice quizzes.Parsers have existed since times immemorial.Smartassing. Until we get a cognitive AI the multiple choice dialogues are a tech limitation closest to IRL open ended dialogue.FTFYSeriously, which DM would you choose - one that forces to resolve every confrontation through violence, or the one that prefers multiple-choice quizzes?
And the answer is neither.
And only allowed for a pretty basic conversation, with players asking and receicing simple information.
Go play some platformers.Oh yes. And CYOA books apparently pass it with flying colors.This is literally the reason why since times immemorial Weizenbaum's Eliza didn't pass the Turing test. Inability to comprehend more than keywords.Which is of course an inherent flaw of the parsers and not a technological limitation of times immemorial. And which is still closer to a "natural" conversation than multiple-choice quizzes.Parsers have existed since times immemorial.Smartassing. Until we get a cognitive AI the multiple choice dialogues are a tech limitation closest to IRL open ended dialogue.FTFYSeriously, which DM would you choose - one that forces to resolve every confrontation through violence, or the one that prefers multiple-choice quizzes?
And the answer is neither.
And only allowed for a pretty basic conversation, with players asking and receicing simple information.
I did, I love Aria of sorrow. They're not rpgs thoughDid you never play the GBA castlevanias, it's a modern attempt to make another one of those and decidedly fun albeit not quite as good as that pedigree.I thought bloodstained was a platformer. Hows it so high up?
They abstained because Felipepepe turned the GOTY pools in a poor excuse to include whatever obscure shitty game he wants to promote, especially games that would never fit in any reasonable definition of cRPG. DE is the least of our problems.Actual combatfags abstained because they didn't buy this VN filth while the Communists used a VPN to vote for their party line darling.
Plenty of people are using it.....and all of them in the liberal spectrum.Hating on DE because you don't agree with the devs on ideology, or any other religion is one thing, but trying to come from the point of
"My roleplaying opportunities are ruined since I can't attack-click on enemies. Sorry, not an RPG."?
Who would be so retarded to actually believe that argument?
libtardPlenty of people are using it.....and all of them in the liberal spectrum.Hating on DE because you don't agree with the devs on ideology, or any other religion is one thing, but trying to come from the point of
"My roleplaying opportunities are ruined since I can't attack-click on enemies. Sorry, not an RPG."?
Who would be so retarded to actually believe that argument?
Commies acusing other people of having leftist ideologies.
This is hilarious as it is sad since it's coming from the Codex and not Twitter...
Yes, I removed all 1/4 votes for Disco, that's why almost 25% of the votes it got are 1/4...Was this before or after you removed votes if a person happened to vote 1 on DE?You are very bad at reading graphs if you think it got a high score. It ranked #38 in the voting, FFS.
3: [Slay the Spire] is definitely not an rpg, I don't know what people are smoking. It is apparently a good deckbuilder though.
It's a solid deck building game, it's the only one of its genre I actually enjoy.
You can argue about the nature of RPG's all you want, but the fact that The Outer Worlds, one of the worst RPG's I've had the displeasure of playing, got such high scores is the real shocker.
You are very bad at reading graphs if you think it got a high score. It ranked #38 in the voting, FFS.
Which only confirms that Dedfire is a decent game. It's up there in the "new classics" crowd.
Not just "decent", but one of the best RPGs of the decade. And the graph supports that.
Maybe some people got burned out by playing it on release (clearly they didn't learn their lesson from PoE1), but they added a great turn-based mode, extremely challenging boss battles and DLCs that add very interesting fights with traps, environmental damage and all those things missing from PoE1.
Gog release when?
It did. Going by Bayesian average across all categories, Expeditions was #1.Gog release when?
When they no longer consider it 'too niche'. This might help, but I'm not holding my breath at this point.
On another note: I still haven't played Disco so I can't comment, but I can throw some oil on the fire by saying that Expedition is so big it might as well have been Underrail 2. I loved it. Could it have beaten Disco if it was?
LoL no,dream on biatch,i used cheatengine toofantadomat finally found a game he could finish without using cheat engine, of course he's excited...
libtardPlenty of people are using it.....and all of them in the liberal spectrum.Hating on DE because you don't agree with the devs on ideology, or any other religion is one thing, but trying to come from the point of
"My roleplaying opportunities are ruined since I can't attack-click on enemies. Sorry, not an RPG."?
Who would be so retarded to actually believe that argument?
Commies acusing other people of having leftist ideologies.
This is hilarious as it is sad since it's coming from the Codex and not Twitter...
Why are you disputing that PoE 2 is a new classic when it already scored very highly in our 101 RPGs list?
How many classic books or movies would you say there are? RPGs have been around for 40 years.Why are you disputing that PoE 2 is a new classic when it already scored very highly in our 101 RPGs list?
Eh, the two PoEs ranked #45, right? Everyone is going to have their favorites, but I do not think we can claim that there are 45 classic RPGs. That is a huge number, and as such "classic" loses its meaning. Therefore, I do not think that this argument stands.