hivemind
Cipher
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2019
- Messages
- 2,386
It was not even two pages of RELEVANT, I repeat, RELEVANT, semi political argument in relation to the universe of the video game. This is normal. It's how discussion works. It even had a clear ending, I specifically finished my point and said enough. How is making a dozen jokes about DLCs better forum "content" than like talking about the perception of the evolution of the setting in modern days? It's especially annoying when you already have a certain lean in the overall positions held by people on this forum because denying somewhat heated argumentation leads to preserving this status quo which deepens the echo chamber. Every casual unchallenged quip leads to a staler and staler environment.
I understand the great scare of GD overflowing full force into the RPG forums, but there has to be reasonable level of tolerance of "gd topics" outside because "gd topics" permeate life which videogames often portray.
If this forum is meant to be about like no limits discussions of RPGS then you must tolerate the fact that sometimes disagreements exist outside of the sanitized scale of whether turn based or real time with pause is better.
In conclusion
Stop cutting threads so much Infinitron holy fuck
I understand the great scare of GD overflowing full force into the RPG forums, but there has to be reasonable level of tolerance of "gd topics" outside because "gd topics" permeate life which videogames often portray.
If this forum is meant to be about like no limits discussions of RPGS then you must tolerate the fact that sometimes disagreements exist outside of the sanitized scale of whether turn based or real time with pause is better.
In conclusion
Stop cutting threads so much Infinitron holy fuck