Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

The decline of the Elder Scrolls series

Turjan

Arcane
Joined
Mar 31, 2008
Messages
5,047
I think we're just doomed at this point because Todd Howard thinks the extent of player interaction in RPGs is "do I kill this person or not-kill them."
I thought it was more like "do I kill this person now or do I kill them later?"
 

taxalot

I'm a spicy fellow.
Patron
Joined
Oct 28, 2010
Messages
9,613
Location
Your wallet.
Codex 2013 PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015
But then that is not really decline, rather continuity ; I do not remember many quests in Arena or Daggerfall that were something else than "Go there, kill that.". Morrowind was pretty much the exception to the rule.
 

Kahlis

Cipher
Joined
Jun 23, 2012
Messages
408
I think we're just doomed at this point because Todd Howard thinks the extent of player interaction in RPGs is "do I kill this person or not-kill them."
I thought it was more like "do I kill this person now or do I kill them later?"
But in most cases now they're essential until Bethesda wants you to kill them!
 

AgentBJ09

Educated
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
54
I think we're just doomed at this point because Todd Howard thinks the extent of player interaction in RPGs is "do I kill this person or not-kill them."
I thought it was more like "do I kill this person now or do I kill them later?"
But in most cases now they're essential until Bethesda wants you to kill them!

That raises an interesting point, though: What about critical NPCs that can be killed? What if that branched the game, or a quest? It happens in Deus Ex when you save Paul or let him die. And in Dragon Age if you let Logain into the Wardens. And I believe Fallout: New Vegas has a lot of these kinds of quest branches.
 

Turjan

Arcane
Joined
Mar 31, 2008
Messages
5,047
I think we're just doomed at this point because Todd Howard thinks the extent of player interaction in RPGs is "do I kill this person or not-kill them."
I thought it was more like "do I kill this person now or do I kill them later?"
But in most cases now they're essential until Bethesda wants you to kill them!

That raises an interesting point, though: What about critical NPCs that can be killed? What if that branched the game, or a quest? It happens in Deus Ex when you save Paul or let him die. And in Dragon Age if you let Logain into the Wardens. And I believe Fallout: New Vegas has a lot of these kinds of quest branches.
Did you never play Morrowind? "The thread of prophecy is severed".
 

Broseph

Dangerous JB
Patron
Joined
Nov 24, 2012
Messages
4,394
Location
Globohomo Gayplex
I think we're just doomed at this point because Todd Howard thinks the extent of player interaction in RPGs is "do I kill this person or not-kill them."
I thought it was more like "do I kill this person now or do I kill them later?"
But in most cases now they're essential until Bethesda wants you to kill them!

That raises an interesting point, though: What about critical NPCs that can be killed? What if that branched the game, or a quest? It happens in Deus Ex when you save Paul or let him die. And in Dragon Age if you let Logain into the Wardens. And I believe Fallout: New Vegas has a lot of these kinds of quest branches.
Did you never play Morrowind? "The thread of prophecy is severed".

That was a good feature. Of course, the message still comes up even after the NPC is no longer useful to you. :hearnoevil:
 

JarlFrank

I like Thief THIS much
Patron
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
33,052
Location
KA.DINGIR.RA.KI
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
I think we're just doomed at this point because Todd Howard thinks the extent of player interaction in RPGs is "do I kill this person or not-kill them."
I thought it was more like "do I kill this person now or do I kill them later?"
But in most cases now they're essential until Bethesda wants you to kill them!

That raises an interesting point, though: What about critical NPCs that can be killed? What if that branched the game, or a quest? It happens in Deus Ex when you save Paul or let him die. And in Dragon Age if you let Logain into the Wardens. And I believe Fallout: New Vegas has a lot of these kinds of quest branches.
Did you never play Morrowind? "The thread of prophecy is severed".

That was a good feature. Of course, the message still comes up even after the NPC is no longer useful to you. :hearnoevil:

Also, you can kill almost the entire population of Vvardenfell except for those relevant to the prophecy and still be the saviour of the island.

GUYS I SAVED YOU
GUYS?
Oh right I killed all of you, heh.
 

AgentBJ09

Educated
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
54
I think we're just doomed at this point because Todd Howard thinks the extent of player interaction in RPGs is "do I kill this person or not-kill them."
I thought it was more like "do I kill this person now or do I kill them later?"
But in most cases now they're essential until Bethesda wants you to kill them!

That raises an interesting point, though: What about critical NPCs that can be killed? What if that branched the game, or a quest? It happens in Deus Ex when you save Paul or let him die. And in Dragon Age if you let Logain into the Wardens. And I believe Fallout: New Vegas has a lot of these kinds of quest branches.
Did you never play Morrowind? "The thread of prophecy is severed".

That was a good feature. Of course, the message still comes up even after the NPC is no longer useful to you. :hearnoevil:

Also, you can kill almost the entire population of Vvardenfell except for those relevant to the prophecy and still be the saviour of the island.

GUYS I SAVED YOU
GUYS?
Oh right I killed all of you, heh.

True, but that was, as TVTropes puts it, Plot Armor. If you did murder those folks, that was a warning to restart at another save because the main plot was dead and the game wasn't able to be finished. (In most instances, anyway.)

What I'm talking about is something I noticed when Dawnguard came out. No option to slaughter critical NPCs, and have the story continue uninterrupted but go another direction. Why didn't you have an option to kill Serana, take her scroll, and then learn by other means what her father was plotting? Or, if you were playing a vampire, just like the Kill the dark Brotherhood quest, have that option instead of trying to join them?

Serana was a critical NPC throughout the DLC, but the truly evil/zealous option, being slaughter any vampire regardless of disposition, was not allowed. At any point.
 

Xi

Arcane
Joined
Jan 28, 2006
Messages
6,101
Location
Twilight Zone
I have an idea! We'll discuss the decline of a gaming franchise every other day for the next couple of years. Who's with me?
 

hakuroshi

Augur
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
589
I think we're just doomed at this point because Todd Howard thinks the extent of player interaction in RPGs is "do I kill this person or not-kill them."
I thought it was more like "do I kill this person now or do I kill them later?"
But in most cases now they're essential until Bethesda wants you to kill them!

That raises an interesting point, though: What about critical NPCs that can be killed? What if that branched the game, or a quest? It happens in Deus Ex when you save Paul or let him die. And in Dragon Age if you let Logain into the Wardens. And I believe Fallout: New Vegas has a lot of these kinds of quest branches.
Did you never play Morrowind? "The thread of prophecy is severed".

That was a good feature. Of course, the message still comes up even after the NPC is no longer useful to you. :hearnoevil:

Also, you can kill almost the entire population of Vvardenfell except for those relevant to the prophecy and still be the saviour of the island.

GUYS I SAVED YOU
GUYS?
Oh right I killed all of you, heh.

Interesting thing, that you could kill even those relevant to the prophesy and still finish the main quest. The only problem, that you would not know how, but means to do so would still be available
 

Commissar Draco

Codexia Comrade Colonel Commissar
Patron
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
20,856
Location
Привислинский край
Insert Title Here Strap Yourselves In Divinity: Original Sin Project: Eternity Torment: Tides of Numenera Wasteland 2 Divinity: Original Sin 2
I think we're just doomed at this point because Todd Howard thinks the extent of player interaction in RPGs is "do I kill this person or not-kill them."
I thought it was more like "do I kill this person now or do I kill them later?"
But in most cases now they're essential until Bethesda wants you to kill them!

That raises an interesting point, though: What about critical NPCs that can be killed? What if that branched the game, or a quest? It happens in Deus Ex when you save Paul or let him die. And in Dragon Age if you let Logain into the Wardens. And I believe Fallout: New Vegas has a lot of these kinds of quest branches.
Did you never play Morrowind? "The thread of prophecy is severed".

That was a good feature. Of course, the message still comes up even after the NPC is no longer useful to you. :hearnoevil:

Also, you can kill almost the entire population of Vvardenfell except for those relevant to the prophecy and still be the saviour of the island.

GUYS I SAVED YOU
GUYS?
Oh right I killed all of you, heh.

Interesting thing, that you could kill even those relevant to the prophesy and still finish the main quest. The only problem, that you would not know how, but means to do so would still be available

And this is why Morrowind was truly sand box game. :bro: (with decent ans well paced main story)
 

taxalot

I'm a spicy fellow.
Patron
Joined
Oct 28, 2010
Messages
9,613
Location
Your wallet.
Codex 2013 PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015
When freedom of action merely revolves around who you can kill, something is seriously wrong with the way gaming chose to evolve.
 

Wyrmlord

Arcane
Joined
Feb 3, 2008
Messages
28,886
But then that is not really decline, rather continuity ; I do not remember many quests in Arena or Daggerfall that were something else than "Go there, kill that.". Morrowind was pretty much the exception to the rule.
Considering Arena never required you to kill a single person, this description is pretty inaccurate.

There is no objective at any point of the game, main quest or side-quest, which specifically asks you to kill someone. You are asked to escort people, find maps, find hidden treasures, hunt for items,.etc but otherwise, no requests to kill someone.

Besides, the game can be ghosted with a Ring of Khajit or a simple Invisibility spell, without a single person killed, so there is not a bit of truth to this claim.
 

taxalot

I'm a spicy fellow.
Patron
Joined
Oct 28, 2010
Messages
9,613
Location
Your wallet.
Codex 2013 PC RPG Website of the Year, 2015
So there were quests to find items in dungeons instead of killing ? Wow, that's complex. They probably busted many neurons for those ideas.
 

Raapys

Arcane
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
4,960
Did any game, ever, do anything more? There are puzzle games, granted, but that kinda goes against the RPG spirit of using your character's stats for problem solving instead of your own. But for RPGs, just about any quest/task can be boiled down to going somewhere, looting/talking to/killing something/someone and returning. It's always a simple principle, no matter how much dialog and flavor you try hide it behind.
 

JarlFrank

I like Thief THIS much
Patron
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
33,052
Location
KA.DINGIR.RA.KI
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
There are puzzle games, granted, but that kinda goes against the RPG spirit of using your character's stats for problem solving instead of your own.

I don't mind when RPGs go against this "RPG spirit" once in a while. Puzzles in dungeons are awesome, and not everything should just boil down to simple stat checks cause that's boring.
 

Mastermind

Cognito Elite Material
Patron
Bethestard
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
21,144
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
We got fewer skills but their depth increased (except for spellcasting).
But their depth didn't increase enough to offset all the cut skills, so effectively we got a lot less stuff. And far less spells and spell effects. And less cool item enchanting. And generally, a lot less features.

They didn't increase enough to offset the dumbing down of magic, but it's more than enough to offset all the cut skills, since most of them were barely used or didn't really do much of anything to begin with. The number of skills is the least of the elder scrolls games' problem.
 

Mastermind

Cognito Elite Material
Patron
Bethestard
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
21,144
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
Did any game, ever, do anything more? There are puzzle games, granted, but that kinda goes against the RPG spirit of using your character's stats for problem solving instead of your own.

How does playing a game go against the spirit of RPGAMES? An RPG should have as much of both as humanly possible and solid design will make use of both.
 

Mastermind

Cognito Elite Material
Patron
Bethestard
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
21,144
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
I disagree with the last part. The speech skills were very useful in Daggerfall if you played a charismatic/non-combat character;

Which has what to do with depth? The language skills are all one trick ponies. That's textbook lack of depth.
 

Mastermind

Cognito Elite Material
Patron
Bethestard
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
21,144
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
I think we're just doomed at this point because Todd Howard thinks the extent of player interaction in RPGs is "do I kill this person or not-kill them."
I thought it was more like "do I kill this person now or do I kill them later?"
But in most cases now they're essential until Bethesda wants you to kill them!

That raises an interesting point, though: What about critical NPCs that can be killed? What if that branched the game, or a quest? It happens in Deus Ex when you save Paul or let him die. And in Dragon Age if you let Logain into the Wardens. And I believe Fallout: New Vegas has a lot of these kinds of quest branches.
Did you never play Morrowind? "The thread of prophecy is severed".

That was a good feature. Of course, the message still comes up even after the NPC is no longer useful to you. :hearnoevil:

Also, you can kill almost the entire population of Vvardenfell except for those relevant to the prophecy and still be the saviour of the island.

GUYS I SAVED YOU
GUYS?
Oh right I killed all of you, heh.

Pretty sure you can kill all of them, period. You just have to take a huge hit to your health to finish the MQ.
 

AgentBJ09

Educated
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
54
I disagree with the last part. The speech skills were very useful in Daggerfall if you played a charismatic/non-combat character;

Which has what to do with depth? The language skills are all one trick ponies. That's textbook lack of depth.

Choice is the better word, because that allows non-combat options versus something like Skyrim which is almost always hack and slash as the solution. They only feel like one-trick ponies because the related perks, IE quests from monsters, were cut.
 
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
6,060
Location
Digger Nick
I disagree with the last part. The speech skills were very useful in Daggerfall if you played a charismatic/non-combat character;

Which has what to do with depth? The language skills are all one trick ponies. That's textbook lack of depth.

Choice is the better word, because that allows non-combat options versus something like Skyrim which is almost always hack and slash as the solution. They only feel like one-trick ponies because the related perks, IE quests from monsters, were cut.

I never really got to Daggerfall in such a scale I did to other games, nor would I in that aspect, but how would the "linguist/speechcraft" character play? Just waltz all the way through those randomly-generated kilometers of dungeons with passive mobs just standing there to loot the "boss chest"?
 

JarlFrank

I like Thief THIS much
Patron
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
33,052
Location
KA.DINGIR.RA.KI
Steve gets a Kidney but I don't even get a tag.
I think we're just doomed at this point because Todd Howard thinks the extent of player interaction in RPGs is "do I kill this person or not-kill them."
I thought it was more like "do I kill this person now or do I kill them later?"
But in most cases now they're essential until Bethesda wants you to kill them!

That raises an interesting point, though: What about critical NPCs that can be killed? What if that branched the game, or a quest? It happens in Deus Ex when you save Paul or let him die. And in Dragon Age if you let Logain into the Wardens. And I believe Fallout: New Vegas has a lot of these kinds of quest branches.
Did you never play Morrowind? "The thread of prophecy is severed".

That was a good feature. Of course, the message still comes up even after the NPC is no longer useful to you. :hearnoevil:

Also, you can kill almost the entire population of Vvardenfell except for those relevant to the prophecy and still be the saviour of the island.

GUYS I SAVED YOU
GUYS?
Oh right I killed all of you, heh.

Pretty sure you can kill all of them, period. You just have to take a huge hit to your health to finish the MQ.

As far as I know, Yagrum Bagarn, the last Dwemer, has to survive, but other than him everyone can die.
 
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
1,875,973
Location
Glass Fields, Ruins of Old Iran
Hmm.

http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Morrowind:Yagrum_Bagarn

It should be noted that Yagrum Bargarn is entirely essential to all parts of the Main Quest, even back-path characters, because if he is killed at any time during the Main Quest, it will anger Divayth Fyr to the point that he will attack you and will also make it impossible to repair Wraithguard if you happen to kill Vivec.


http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Morrowind:Wraithguard

You can beat the game without Wraithguard—it is just more difficult, since you will lose health continuously (50-125 damage/sec with 0% Resist Magicka) while using Keening or Sunder.

I wonder if you can calm Divvy. But yeah, it seems you can kill them all as long as you can take the HP hit. You don't really need the mittens, just bulky resistances.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom