Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

The women of Caesar's Legion shouldn't have all been slaves

Trashos

Arcane
Joined
Dec 28, 2015
Messages
3,413
They try and give a minor amount of grey to The Board (like they did Caesar's Legion) by introducing a problem that maybe sorta justifies their actions near the end. However it still leads to a pretty "evil" ending. There is definitely a lot of grey in aggressively fighting The Board though, because you're hurting a lot of "little people" who aren't evil. It's a relatively good encapsulation of the issues with revolution/"terrorism" as a way to fight authoritarian governments.

If Obsidian wanted to give the Legion and their system a fair chance, they would have attributed them only with the bad features that stem from the same origins as their good features. That's what they did with the NCR, for example. Instead, the Legion's system was presented with its good and its bad, and then the woman enslavement idiocy was added on top for no apparent reason. "But you know what, they also enslave all women, LOL". It was like Obsidian suddenly realized that militant dictatorship was looking fucking cool in their game, and resorted to over-the-top measures to solve the "issue".

Anyway, from the descriptions it looks like once again, as in New Vegas, Obsidian tried to portray their main factions as the grey and the greyish evil. I don't really know why they do that instead of straightup having grey vs grey.
 
Vatnik Wumao
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
17,900
Location
大同
They try and give a minor amount of grey to The Board (like they did Caesar's Legion) by introducing a problem that maybe sorta justifies their actions near the end. However it still leads to a pretty "evil" ending. There is definitely a lot of grey in aggressively fighting The Board though, because you're hurting a lot of "little people" who aren't evil. It's a relatively good encapsulation of the issues with revolution/"terrorism" as a way to fight authoritarian governments.

If Obsidian wanted to give the Legion and their system a fair chance, they would have attributed them only with the bad features that stem from the same origins as their good features. That's what they did with the NCR, for example.
More than that, they even whitewashed the NCR by not properly presenting the issue of the barons which the NCR has back home.
 

DalekFlay

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 5, 2010
Messages
14,118
Location
New Vegas
Anyway, from the descriptions it looks like once again, as in New Vegas, Obsidian tried to portray their main factions as the grey and the greyish evil. I don't really know why they do that instead of straightup having grey vs grey.

With New Vegas the issue was time supposedly, they didn't have the ability to flesh out the Legion's good sides like they wanted to. With Outer Worlds it feels more like "The Board is obviously evil but we need an ending where you side with them anyway so..." They both fail really, but for different reasons. I agree grey-on-grey would be better, and I hear the Doctor has some issues in the "good" playthrough I haven't seen yet, but I would definitely prefer a handful of factions that each have good and bad in them and your decisions has more to do with how your character feels politically/socially. The faction system in this game is one of its biggest weaknesses overall, IMO. None of it really matters outside the Board or Anti-Board choice.
 

LudensCogitet

Learned
Joined
Nov 4, 2019
Messages
210
They try and give a minor amount of grey to The Board (like they did Caesar's Legion) by introducing a problem that maybe sorta justifies their actions near the end. However it still leads to a pretty "evil" ending. There is definitely a lot of grey in aggressively fighting The Board though, because you're hurting a lot of "little people" who aren't evil. It's a relatively good encapsulation of the issues with revolution/"terrorism" as a way to fight authoritarian governments.

If Obsidian wanted to give the Legion and their system a fair chance, they would have attributed them only with the bad features that stem from the same origins as their good features. That's what they did with the NCR, for example. Instead, the Legion's system was presented with its good and its bad, and then the woman enslavement idiocy was added on top for no apparent reason. "But you know what, they also enslave all women, LOL". It was like Obsidian suddenly realized that militant dictatorship was looking fucking cool in their game, and resorted to over-the-top measures to solve the "issue".

Anyway, from the descriptions it looks like once again, as in New Vegas, Obsidian tried to portray their main factions as the grey and the greyish evil. I don't really know why they do that instead of straightup having grey vs grey.

This is a really good point. Honestly presenting the factions and their beliefs (with good writing of course) could lead to some very difficult choices and even some self reflection ("Why do I feel so bad that this seems so good?")

Actually, whatever else one thinks of the game, I've found Jeff Vogel's new game Queen's Wish to actually contain several dramatic choices of that variety (Not really sure how much C&C results from those choices, but that's another question for another thread).
 

Wesp5

Arcane
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
1,770
I don't really know why they do that instead of straightup having grey vs grey.

Maybe because in fiction as in reality not everything is grey, but some people are outright evil? I said it already and I repeat it again: a good story often needs a good villain, otherwise it might end up boring! I haven't seen any good villains in TOW yet, only a lot of mad and incompetent white males struggling against strong and diverse females...
 
Vatnik Wumao
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
17,900
Location
大同
I don't really know why they do that instead of straightup having grey vs grey.

Maybe because in fiction as in reality not everything is grey, but some people are outright evil? I said it already and I repeat it again: a good story often needs a good villain, otherwise it might end up boring! I haven't seen any good villains in TOW yet, only a lot of mad and incompetent white males struggling against strong and diverse females...
I agree, but the depth of a character unavoidably gives it some shades of gray. A 'pure evil' antagonist can only be a metaphysically evil one (think of the D&D derived planes) and that's more often than not boring.

To give a concrete example, do you prefer the Archdemon and the Broodmother of Origins or the Architect and the Mother of Awakening?
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
35,800
and then the woman enslavement idiocy was added on top for no apparent reason. "But you know what, they also enslave all women, LOL". It was like Obsidian suddenly realized that militant dictatorship was looking fucking cool in their game, and resorted to over-the-top measures to solve the "issue".

Everyone's a slave in the Legion. Able-bodied men fight until they die. Women breed until they're unable to, then they work the fields alongside the men who cannot fight. Those who live in Legion-occupied territories continue life as usual.
 

fantadomat

Arcane
Edgy Vatnik Wumao
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
37,163
Location
Bulgaria
How many Bulgarians are here in this forum ..

:hmmm:
In this thread alone i counted three,maybe four :).

Orma you are a disgusting tranny kebab that should be made in to pig's soap! It is real decline that Erdogan didn't bring back the tranny throwing!

EDIT:In the older thread i counted them,before infi decided to split this authistic thread. I am yet to count them in this one.
 
Last edited:

Trashos

Arcane
Joined
Dec 28, 2015
Messages
3,413
and then the woman enslavement idiocy was added on top for no apparent reason. "But you know what, they also enslave all women, LOL". It was like Obsidian suddenly realized that militant dictatorship was looking fucking cool in their game, and resorted to over-the-top measures to solve the "issue".

Everyone's a slave in the Legion. Able-bodied men fight until they die. Women breed until they're unable to, then they work the fields alongside the men who cannot fight. Those who live in Legion-occupied territories continue life as usual.

The men are initially slaves, but then they are trained to believe in the cause. They are not slaves anymore, they are soldiers. Nothing like that for women, they remain mere slaves. It is not roman-like, and it causes further inconsistencies when the main character is female but Caeser still wants to work with her (I am guessing, I never tried it). Any way you look at it, it does not fit. It is completely lol-random.
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
35,800
They are not slaves anymore, they are soldiers.

They're conscripts. Fighting slaves.

It is not roman-like, and it causes further inconsistencies when the main character is female but Caeser still wants to work with her

Caesar admits his society isn't Roman and is only using the trappings of it because it's so alien compared to every other identity in the wasteland. He also has no problem with women. Using women as breeding machines is simply a means to getting as many fighting men as fast as possible (and also a fetish of Josh Sawyer's since it's a reused idea from Icewind Dale II).
 

Trashos

Arcane
Joined
Dec 28, 2015
Messages
3,413
They're conscripts. Fighting slaves.

Caesar admits his society isn't Roman and is only using the trappings of it because it's so alien compared to every other identity in the wasteland. He also has no problem with women. Using women as breeding machines is simply a means to getting as many fighting men as fast as possible (and also a fetish of Josh Sawyer's since it's a reused idea from Icewind Dale II).

Do you really not see the difference? At the very least, men are given the option to believe in the cause. The Legion characters we meet are enjoying themselves. And then, the strategy changes for women completely.

I do not remember Caesar's admittance that they are not really roman-like, but I have no reason to doubt it. It sounds like the writer was trying to excuse all the inexcusable decisions by the narrative designers there.

Women do not have to be slaves to be breeding machines. They have been breeding machines without being slaves for thousands of years. Caesar is a well-read guy, he must have known.
 

fantadomat

Arcane
Edgy Vatnik Wumao
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
37,163
Location
Bulgaria
They're conscripts. Fighting slaves.

Caesar admits his society isn't Roman and is only using the trappings of it because it's so alien compared to every other identity in the wasteland. He also has no problem with women. Using women as breeding machines is simply a means to getting as many fighting men as fast as possible (and also a fetish of Josh Sawyer's since it's a reused idea from Icewind Dale II).

Do you really not see the difference? At the very least, men are given the option to believe in the cause. The Legion characters we meet are enjoying themselves. And then, the strategy changes for women completely.

I do not remember Caesar's admittance that they are not really roman-like, but I have no reason to doubt it. It sounds like the writer was trying to excuse all the inexcusable decisions by the narrative designers there.

Women do not have to be slaves to be breeding machines. They have been breeding machines without being slaves for thousands of years. Caesar is a well-read guy, he must have known.
He also saw how the liberal society ended the world,so decide not to risk it again with muh equality :smug:. The only bad thing was that they didn't finish the legion and just left it as the muh bad goys.
 

S.torch

Arbiter
Joined
Jan 4, 2019
Messages
943
Do you really not see the difference? At the very least, men are given the option to believe in the cause.

What about the courier? Even if she is a woman, Caesar praise her achievements anyways, and nobody else in the legion downplay them.
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
35,800
At the very least, men are given the option to believe in the cause. The Legion characters we meet are enjoying themselves. And then, the strategy changes for women completely.
Their choices are fight or die. They're enjoying themselves because any dissenters are dead.

Women do not have to be slaves to be breeding machines. They have been breeding machines without being slaves for thousands of years. Caesar is a well-read guy, he must have known.
They do when you want them having as many kids as it's humanly possibly to have within their fertile period. Caesar's trying to build the biggest army he possibly can, he has no time for feelings.

Which part was that? My memory is hazy on it.
The Legion of the Chimera rape prisoners of the war regularly and systematically to make more hybrids so they can have more hybrid creatures for their hybrid society and wage war/defend themselves agains the normies.
 

Trashos

Arcane
Joined
Dec 28, 2015
Messages
3,413
aweigh, that's the way it should have been. But in the game it is not.

fantadomat, I am not saying that women should have been equal to men in Caesar's society. I am saying that they should not have been slaves.

Roguey, so your argument is that women were slaves because that's more efficient for producing soldiers? I will keep this in mind for next time humanity is in need for kids. I do not know if what you are saying is true, but no such argument is given or in any way supported within the game.
 

Roguey

Codex Staff
Staff Member
Sawyerite
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
35,800
Roguey, so your argument is that women were slaves because that's more efficient for producing soldiers? I will keep this in mind for next time humanity is in need for kids. I do not know if what you are saying is true, but no such argument is given or in any way supported within the game.

Until now, every tribe I've conquered has been so backwards and stunted, enslavement has been a gift bestowed upon them.

There will be no failure this time, no retreat, no years of gathering slaves and resources for another assault.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom