Vault Dweller
Commissar, Red Star Studio
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2003
- Messages
- 28,024
<a href=http://www.ynetnews.com/articles//0,7340,L-3052074,00.html>Apparently</a>, IDF (Israeli Defense Forces) thinks that LARPers are bad for army business because "they're detached from reality and suscepitble to influence".
<blockquote>"One of the tests we do, either by asking soldiers directly or through information provided us, is to ask whether they take part in the game," he says. "If a soldier answers in the affirmative, he is sent to a professional for an evaluation, usually a psychologist."
"These people have a tendency to be influenced by external factors which could cloud their judgment, a military official says. "They may be detached from reality or have a weak personality – elements which lower a person's security clearance, allowing them to serve in the army, but not in sensitive positions."</blockquote>
That's understandable. Army can not trust a LARPer. You never know whether he will shoot at enemy and start screaming: LIGHTNING BOLT! LIGHTNING BOLT! LIGHTNING BOLT!
Thanks, <b>jeansberg</b>
<blockquote>"One of the tests we do, either by asking soldiers directly or through information provided us, is to ask whether they take part in the game," he says. "If a soldier answers in the affirmative, he is sent to a professional for an evaluation, usually a psychologist."
"These people have a tendency to be influenced by external factors which could cloud their judgment, a military official says. "They may be detached from reality or have a weak personality – elements which lower a person's security clearance, allowing them to serve in the army, but not in sensitive positions."</blockquote>
That's understandable. Army can not trust a LARPer. You never know whether he will shoot at enemy and start screaming: LIGHTNING BOLT! LIGHTNING BOLT! LIGHTNING BOLT!
Thanks, <b>jeansberg</b>