While they gave 5/5 for DA2. The reviewer says that the game is so hard, that it takes the fun out of the game.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/article ... ngs-Review
At least the commenters have some common sense:
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/article ... ngs-Review
At least the commenters have some common sense:
The reviewer thought the QTE fist fight was hard? Okay, this reviewer is pretty bad at video games.
Horrible review fyi, especially with lines like this, "I was so frustrated and pissed that any fondness for the characters I'd met so far was completely erased."
Anyone who is bad at video games should not write reviews, they just complain about how difficult the game is instead of actually focusing on the game itself. I already finished the game, and really there were a couple difficult battles, but the only one I really became frustrated with was one you didn't even have to complete to finish the game. I did beat it, and it took a few tries, but it also garnered me the best sword in the game, so it works.
If you think this is bad, take a look at Destructoid's reviews. Their reviewers flat out refuse to finish games they're reviewing if they feel it's too hard. They had 'Not-Review's for Metro 2033 and Demon's Souls. Which is pretty stupid, mind, since Metro 2033 is NOT a hard game.
Bottom line: reviewer insufficiently competent to review this game. Review therefore not worth the paper it's written on.
More like "Reviewer should suck it up and play on easy."