Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

default avatar

Saint_Proverbius

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
11,475
Location
Behind you.
Can't the codex just use custom "DUMBFUCK!" tags for shitposters like in the old days?

That would make me very weepy. It worked so much better than banning people. It allowed the person to still be on the forum and doing whatever stupid things they typically did while warning everyone what they were AND completely ticked off the person who got it.
 

Grunker

RPG Codex Ghost
Patron
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
27,385
Location
Copenhagen
Can't the codex just use custom "DUMBFUCK!" tags for shitposters like in the old days?

That would make me very weepy. It worked so much better than banning people. It allowed the person to still be on the forum and doing whatever stupid things they typically did while warning everyone what they were AND completely ticked off the person who got it.

Not that I'm opposed to the idea, but it is worn like a badge of honor by some of the retards.
 

Kz3r0

Arcane
Joined
May 28, 2008
Messages
27,012
Can't the codex just use custom "DUMBFUCK!" tags for shitposters like in the old days?

That would make me very weepy. It worked so much better than banning people. It allowed the person to still be on the forum and doing whatever stupid things they typically did while warning everyone what they were AND completely ticked off the person who got it.

Not that I'm opposed to the idea, but it is worn like a badge of honor by some of the retards.
The ignore function hurt them more, no point in the acting without public, as all their childish bawing about decline and unmanliness aptly proves.
 

sgc_meltdown

Arcane
Joined
May 8, 2003
Messages
6,000
I think the constant redirection to rpgwatch whenever chosen ones post is currently the best user materia for special cases

nobody will know they have it except for them or when they bitch about it on the forums, and if they really want to they can still get their posts in
 

Saint_Proverbius

Administrator
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
11,475
Location
Behind you.
The ignore function hurt them more, no point in the acting without public, as all their childish bawing about decline and unmanliness aptly proves.

I think if you have more than three people on your ignore list, you should get a special, "I'M A WEEPING VAGINA" tag. Suck it up, it's just words.
 

LundB

Mistakes were made.
Joined
Jan 2, 2012
Messages
4,160
I think if you have more than three people on your ignore list, you should get a special, "I'M A WEEPING VAGINA" tag. Suck it up, it's just words.

O7qCm.jpg


de045b78.png
 

Kz3r0

Arcane
Joined
May 28, 2008
Messages
27,012
The ignore function hurt them more, no point in the acting without public, as all their childish bawing about decline and unmanliness aptly proves.

I think if you have more than three people on your ignore list, you should get a special, "I'M A WEEPING VAGINA" tag. Suck it up, it's just words.
Do it, then give me the possibility of posting hundreds of scat porn pictures without being banned.
 

CappenVarra

phase-based phantasmist
Patron
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
2,912
Location
Ardamai
I think the constant redirection to rpgwatch whenever chosen ones post is currently the best user materia for special cases

nobody will know they have it except for them or when they bitch about it on the forums, and if they really want to they can still get their posts in
http://www.rpgcodex.net/forums/index.php?threads/playing-aod-for-dummies.72146/#post-2092150
hiver said:
cant edit the post, forums are bonkers again, pages dont load, edit doesnt work, or it all gets redirected to rpg watch.
:hmmm:
 

laclongquan

Arcane
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
1,870,144
Location
Searching for my kidnapped sister
yJ6PX.png
is the best option avaible.

1. Not every new Codexer is a troll. Some just want to register first. And it takes a long time around here to awaken their inner troll. Do consider the fate of Andhaira and Volourn.

2. The question mark the feature of everynewbie :they dont know and they want to ask.

3. The combination of gender emoticon is not distinctive enough for RPGCodex. Any forum can use it.

SO I vote this for the default avatar of newbie.
 

Kaol

Educated
Joined
Oct 14, 2011
Messages
253
I like the new default avatar. For people like me who cannot be bothered to change their avatars it fits very well.
 

tiagocc0

Arcane
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Messages
2,056
Location
Brazil
let it be a naked photo of prosper, those weak of heart should not enter the depths of the codex
 
Self-Ejected

Ulminati

Kamelåså!
Patron
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
20,317
Location
DiNMRK
The current default avatar is fine. Maybe add pink ribbons to the female baby troll to make them stand out and get "TITS or GTFO" over with faster and help hiver determine which newfags to leap to the defense of?
 

DarkUnderlord

Professional Throne Sitter
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2002
Messages
28,343
Oh, forum upgrade probably nixed it or something. Will look into.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom