Jason
chasing a bee
<strong>[ Review ]</strong>
<p>Boomtown has a short <a href="http://pc.boomtown.net/en_uk/articles/art.view.php?id=11158" target="_self" title="review">review</a> of Paradox Interactive's Hearts of Iron 2: Doomsday. They easily recommend Doomsday to strategy fans who haven't touched the original Hearts of Iron 2. They're not as sure about recommending the purchase for owners of the previous game, though.</p><p> </p><blockquote>However, if you already own Hearts of Iron II it gets a bit
complicated. I found myself playing the 1936 scenario more than the
1945 scenario because Doomsday is a very complex scenario. There are
tons of troops, tons of decisions to take and you haven’t had the
chance to build anything up – you are thrown directly into WWIII. But
the new features work in the old scenarios as well so by playing those
I got the best of both worlds, so to speak.
</blockquote><blockquote>
Doomsday is still also a bit bug-ridden and while it doesn’t affect
gameplay significantly hardcore fans will notice the problems.
Meanwhile the original Hearts of Iron II is by now a very solid and
well-balanced game. So you have to consider – do you want the new
features and new scenario or do you want a bug-free experience (which
is important not least in multiplayer)?
</blockquote><p> </p><p>In the end, they gave it a solid 8, mainly for the gameplay and durability. Read the review <a href="http://pc.boomtown.net/en_uk/articles/art.view.php?id=11158" target="_self" title="review">here</a>. </p><blockquote><p> </p></blockquote><p>Spotted @ <a href="http://www.shacknews.com/">Shack News</a></p>
<p>Boomtown has a short <a href="http://pc.boomtown.net/en_uk/articles/art.view.php?id=11158" target="_self" title="review">review</a> of Paradox Interactive's Hearts of Iron 2: Doomsday. They easily recommend Doomsday to strategy fans who haven't touched the original Hearts of Iron 2. They're not as sure about recommending the purchase for owners of the previous game, though.</p><p> </p><blockquote>However, if you already own Hearts of Iron II it gets a bit
complicated. I found myself playing the 1936 scenario more than the
1945 scenario because Doomsday is a very complex scenario. There are
tons of troops, tons of decisions to take and you haven’t had the
chance to build anything up – you are thrown directly into WWIII. But
the new features work in the old scenarios as well so by playing those
I got the best of both worlds, so to speak.
</blockquote><blockquote>
Doomsday is still also a bit bug-ridden and while it doesn’t affect
gameplay significantly hardcore fans will notice the problems.
Meanwhile the original Hearts of Iron II is by now a very solid and
well-balanced game. So you have to consider – do you want the new
features and new scenario or do you want a bug-free experience (which
is important not least in multiplayer)?
</blockquote><p> </p><p>In the end, they gave it a solid 8, mainly for the gameplay and durability. Read the review <a href="http://pc.boomtown.net/en_uk/articles/art.view.php?id=11158" target="_self" title="review">here</a>. </p><blockquote><p> </p></blockquote><p>Spotted @ <a href="http://www.shacknews.com/">Shack News</a></p>