Putting the 'role' back in role-playing games since 2002.
Donate to Codex
Good Old Games
  • Welcome to rpgcodex.net, a site dedicated to discussing computer based role-playing games in a free and open fashion. We're less strict than other forums, but please refer to the rules.

    "This message is awaiting moderator approval": All new users must pass through our moderation queue before they will be able to post normally. Until your account has "passed" your posts will only be visible to yourself (and moderators) until they are approved. Give us a week to get around to approving / deleting / ignoring your mundane opinion on crap before hassling us about it. Once you have passed the moderation period (think of it as a test), you will be able to post normally, just like all the other retards.

If you could only play one of these RPGs which would it be?

If I only had time to play one of these games I would choose...

  • Arcanum

    Votes: 41 32.0%
  • KOTOR 1

    Votes: 9 7.0%
  • TES III Daggerfall

    Votes: 12 9.4%
  • Grimoire

    Votes: 13 10.2%
  • Wiz 8

    Votes: 16 12.5%
  • Fallout 2

    Votes: 37 28.9%

  • Total voters
    128
  • Poll closed .

Scarlet Lilith

Learned
Joined
Apr 5, 2020
Messages
116
Location
❤️Hell❤️
Arcanum is the obvious choice based on what you’ve written, but I think you have bandwidth for Fallout 2 as well.
I would skip Fallout 2 honestly, and give Arcanum preferential treatment. Once you have played the first Fallout then the sequel is really just more of the same, Arcanum is not. I mean, you could always play Fallout 2 if you have the time for it afterwards and it's super obvious that he would love Arcanum. I mean, hypothetically, we all know you're going to play whatever the poll tells you to play, Bloodeyes.
 

Butter

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
7,677
If you have time to finish Grimoire, then you have time to finish Fallout 2, Arcanum, and KotOR.
It's that big? I'm glad it's not winning then. I want to actually finish whatever wins. If these results hold it looks like I'll be playing Fallout 2. If it's as short as Fallout 1 I'll play the next most popular option as well.
Fallout 2 is bigger than Fallout 1, probably 40-50 hours on a first playthrough. Arcanum is about the same, maybe a little shorter. Grimoire can easily go above 150 hours.
 

Lord_Potato

Arcane
Glory to Ukraine
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Messages
10,025
Location
Free City of Warsaw
Given your responses, games and the raw time you have to play, I would suggest Arcanum. Fallout 2 is inferior to 1 in all aspects that made fallout 1 interesting, with the exception of weapon and location variety.

That being said, if you really are going to iron man 18 hrs/day for weeks on end, you can play both. Knock fallout 2 out in several days so you have closure on the franchise, and start up arcanum. Arcanum is huge and will feel very comfortable with your familiarity with the fallouts.

To have closure on thr franchise he should also play Fallout New Vegas. And then the unofficial, but great Fallout Ressurection, Fallout of Nevada and then wait for the translation of Sonora.

Only then he can safely walk away from the franchise.

But I think in those 3 weeks he'll have time for both Fallout 2 and Arcanum. Especially with his 18 hours/day marathons.
 

CappenVarra

phase-based phantasmist
Patron
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
2,912
Location
Ardamai
in that timeframe, you can finish Arcanum or FO2; i'd go for Arcanum, but hey - it's your time

yes, you can also finish Kotor, but unless you're a huge Biowhore and/or Star Wars groupie, you won't miss much if you never play it

Daggerfall, Wiz 8, and Grimoire can theoretically be completed in 3 weeks, but they're the type of game you want to spend months with if you're doing it properly
 

Bloodeyes

Arcane
Joined
Jan 30, 2007
Messages
2,912
in that timeframe, you can finish Arcanum or FO2; i'd go for Arcanum, but hey - it's your time

yes, you can also finish Kotor, but unless you're a huge Biowhore and/or Star Wars groupie, you won't miss much if you never play it

Daggerfall, Wiz 8, and Grimoire can theoretically be completed in 3 weeks, but they're the type of game you want to spend months with if you're doing it properly

Months... I guess I could play them when I retire in another 40 years or so... Or I may have to adjust from total immersion playthroughs to a more measured approach. After all many people don't live to see their retirement.
 

Casual Hero

Augur
Joined
Mar 24, 2015
Messages
489
Location
USA
I would not suggest playing Daggerfall over your break if you want to complete a game. As much as I love it, it isn't really something that you sit down and beat. I mean, yeah, it does have a main story, but to me it is something that you play on and off over a long period of time. Daggerfall is more like a fantasy world sim. Good for RP. (If you do decide to play Daggerfall at some point make sure you play Daggerfall Unity. At this point there is no reason to play the original Daggerfall over DF Unity.)
I would probably say Arcanum or Fallout 2. A lot more narratively driven games than Daggerfall, so you are more likely to get through them quickly.
 

Scarlet Lilith

Learned
Joined
Apr 5, 2020
Messages
116
Location
❤️Hell❤️
Or I may have to adjust from total immersion playthroughs to a more measured approach. After all many people don't live to see their retirement.
Yes, get more healthy habits, Bloodeyes! Grimoire is like a boiled sweet, you're supposed to savor it for a bit, not swallow it whole. I'm not sure if it would even be enjoyable that way, even though time flies when playing it.
 

Bloodeyes

Arcane
Joined
Jan 30, 2007
Messages
2,912
Or I may have to adjust from total immersion playthroughs to a more measured approach. After all many people don't live to see their retirement.
Yes, get more healthy habits, Bloodeyes! Grimoire is like a boiled sweet, you're supposed to savor it for a bit, not swallow it whole. I'm not sure if it would even be enjoyable that way, even though time flies when playing it.
I have too many healthy habits. I work out daily. I don't smoke. I don't drink. I don't watch pornography. I don't smoke weed or bath salts any more. I don't even drink coffee after 12pm. I'm going to marathon the shit out of a game on my holiday. But yeah if I want to play more than a dozen or so more RPGs in the rest of my life I may have to start doing the little and often thing as well.
 

Scarlet Lilith

Learned
Joined
Apr 5, 2020
Messages
116
Location
❤️Hell❤️
Or I may have to adjust from total immersion playthroughs to a more measured approach. After all many people don't live to see their retirement.
Yes, get more healthy habits, Bloodeyes! Grimoire is like a boiled sweet, you're supposed to savor it for a bit, not swallow it whole. I'm not sure if it would even be enjoyable that way, even though time flies when playing it.
I have too many healthy habits. I work out daily. I don't smoke. I don't drink. I don't watch pornography. I don't smoke weed or bath salts any more. I don't even drink coffee after 12pm. I'm going to marathon the shit out of a game on my holiday. But yeah if I want to play more than a dozen or so more RPGs in the rest of my life I may have to start doing the little and often thing as well.
That's so healthy it almost loops back into unhealthy lol, you have to remember that it is important to relax sometimes, stress is terrible for you.
 
Joined
Dec 5, 2010
Messages
1,611
Arcanum. Fallout 2's ok as well. You won't be able to stomach kotor 1's juvenile writing and spoiled story having already played 2.
 
Last edited:

agris

Arcane
Patron
Joined
Apr 16, 2004
Messages
6,820
Or I may have to adjust from total immersion playthroughs to a more measured approach. After all many people don't live to see their retirement.
Yes, get more healthy habits, Bloodeyes! Grimoire is like a boiled sweet, you're supposed to savor it for a bit, not swallow it whole. I'm not sure if it would even be enjoyable that way, even though time flies when playing it.
I have too many healthy habits. I work out daily. I don't smoke. I don't drink. I don't watch pornography. I don't smoke weed or bath salts any more. I don't even drink coffee after 12pm. I'm going to marathon the shit out of a game on my holiday. But yeah if I want to play more than a dozen or so more RPGs in the rest of my life I may have to start doing the little and often thing as well.

As someone who has recently gone from academic to professional and has very many time constraints, I feel the need to alert you to how impossible it is - for me - to play cRPGs in tiny chunks. Minutes here and there get lost, and I inevitably end up rudderless when loading a save. Granted my constraints are different than yours, I have a family, but I’ve found anything less than an hour of playtime is essentially worthless. Too much time to reacquaint myself with quests and motivations and thoughts. Granted though that is not playing every day, that is more like playing once a week. If you play daily, you can probably avoid this scenario by playing a minimum of 20 minutes.
 

Sykar

Arcane
Joined
Dec 2, 2014
Messages
11,297
Location
Turn right after Alpha Centauri
Given your responses, games and the raw time you have to play, I would suggest Arcanum. Fallout 2 is inferior to 1 in all aspects that made fallout 1 interesting, with the exception of weapon and location variety.

That being said, if you really are going to iron man 18 hrs/day for weeks on end, you can play both. Knock fallout 2 out in several days so you have closure on the franchise, and start up arcanum. Arcanum is huge and will feel very comfortable with your familiarity with the fallouts.

Simply untrue. Size and scope of the game, party members and their handling/gearing, charisma being useful, Lynette battle of wits, finding out about the connections between NCR, New Reno and Vault City just to name a handful of things FO 2 did better. The only real problem FO 2 had was cut content and no quality control giving us the overabundance of cultural reference/fdumb jokes but then again the game was rushed. Temple of Trials is overhated and done in about 10 minutes or even less if you are a veteran of FO 1. FO 1 is tighter and more focused but whether that is better or worse is up to personal preference.
 

curds

Magister
Joined
Nov 24, 2019
Messages
1,098
My vote goes to Fallout 2.
I have actually started Fallout 2 a handful of times but I lost interest for some reason.
Fallout 2 really picks up after the first few hours, in my opinion. Now that you've got some free time you can push through the somewhat boring beginning and play this masterpiece to completion.

Fallout has a vastly superior early game, but I think Fallout 2 is better overall.
 
Self-Ejected

aweigh

Self-Ejected
Joined
Aug 23, 2005
Messages
17,978
Location
Florida
Out of the choices in the poll the only real answer is Fallout 2, everything else is compromised in some way.
 

luj1

You're all shills
Vatnik
Joined
Jan 2, 2016
Messages
13,358
Location
Eastern block
Tough choice but I went with Arcanum.

KotOR is streamlined and relatively short.

Dagerfall, Wiz8 and Grimoire are insanely fun, but can get monotonous.

Fallout 2 albeit not short isn't long either. Still has less content than Arcanum.

Technological playthough of Arcanum probably has access to the most content. There's so much delicious nonsense in that.

But again, it's a beautiful poll. You can't go wrong, I love all of them.
 
Last edited:

Cat Dude

Savant
Joined
Nov 5, 2018
Messages
498
Neither in the list. Dark Souls.
He clearly wants to play an RPG! Dark Souls is an action game first and foremost, which doesn't mean it's bad mind you, but it doesn't belong on that list!

it does have just as much merit as an RPG as anything else. The RPG is way too broad a genre, I mean you can loosely find reasoning for games like System Shock, Mass Effect, Deus Ex, and other games that have been merging RPG features into other genres. Ever since System Shock 2 in 1999 the line between action and RPG has been shattered, that was a FPS survival horror game with RPG stats, leveling, and of course making your character build with strengths and weakness like if you're full on commando then you probably won't be a good hacker or psychic. After SS2, it proved that any action game could run on full RPG systems without losing anything of an RPG or action game.
 

Bloodeyes

Arcane
Joined
Jan 30, 2007
Messages
2,912
Neither in the list. Dark Souls.
He clearly wants to play an RPG! Dark Souls is an action game first and foremost, which doesn't mean it's bad mind you, but it doesn't belong on that list!

it does have just as much merit as an RPG as anything else. The RPG is way too broad a genre, I mean you can loosely find reasoning for games like System Shock, Mass Effect, Deus Ex, and other games that have been merging RPG features into other genres. Ever since System Shock 2 in 1999 the line between action and RPG has been shattered, that was a FPS survival horror game with RPG stats, leveling, and of course making your character build with strengths and weakness like if you're full on commando then you probably won't be a good hacker or psychic. After SS2, it proved that any action game could run on full RPG systems without losing anything of an RPG or action game.

Dark Souls is an action RPG that primarily focuses on the action side. I have it on ps4, and I'll get around to it one day. This thread is about traditional CPRGs, not hybrid genres.

Arcanum is getting quite the lead. I think it's going to win. That's good because I already own it. Bad because I'll need to ask for help making it run, when the time comes.
 

As an Amazon Associate, rpgcodex.net earns from qualifying purchases.
Back
Top Bottom