After watching the trailers I have to wonder what anything of this has to do with "assassin's creed". I really liked the first 3 games, the sci-fi stuff, conspiracies, secret ancient organisations etc, now it just seems it's some kind of fantasy history mini-rpg's? Besides that, the combat look really poor.
It has nothing to do with the first three games, fortunately since they age like old socks - but that's been the case for half a decade, if you had bothered to look into it. Did you think they'd remake the same game forever?
Even Ubi iterates on their formula, now it's an RPG like Witcher 3. It used to be a Prince of Persia clone with a Dan Brown plot, which was very, very stupid. Now, the Dan Brown lore is still there, just de-emphasized a lot.
Clearly this autistic fart-huffer has never played the earlier AC games.
Oh I have, you little shitstain and judging by your own post, you really shouldn't draw attention to "fart-huffing", which is the main content of that drivel you excreted.
While nowhere near the likes of KCD or Bannerlord the combat in earlier AC games was indeed way more realistic. The combat was harder, the climbing wasn't ridiculously fast and PCs could be knocked down more often and didn't have a shit-ton of different, unneeded weapons.
Now you proudly advertise that you haven't played any of the AC games, at all ... der ewige Newfag.
Fucking autistically namedropping some shit games, as if anyone gives a damn. Combat in "earlier" AC games, such as AC2, was utter power fantasy bullshit.
Here's how the game works: Parry+stab = kill, and only one enemy will ever attack at a time, because realism
you fucking turbo retard.
The earlier games did a great job of actually making you feel like playing a normal, trained, human assassin rather than a supersoldier who can kill forever.
I rest my case, you paint eating chimp. Go kill yourself, shithead. You'll die alone and abandoned anyway.